Understanding the metacognition and impulsivity issues with clinical and cognitive insight in borderline personality disorder - A cross sectional study.
Rajnish Raj, Aaliya Khanam, Zaid A Wani, Afifa Afreen, Simranjeet Kour, Ajaz A Khan, Inaamul Haq
{"title":"Understanding the metacognition and impulsivity issues with clinical and cognitive insight in borderline personality disorder - A cross sectional study.","authors":"Rajnish Raj, Aaliya Khanam, Zaid A Wani, Afifa Afreen, Simranjeet Kour, Ajaz A Khan, Inaamul Haq","doi":"10.4103/ipj.ipj_348_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Borderline personality disorder (BLPD) is one of the most common personalities disorders frequently encountered in the outpatient setup.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Understanding the role of impulsivity and metacognition in clinical and cognitive insight among BLPD patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed among 81 patients diagnosed with BLPD. Sociodemographic details were collected, and the Borderline Personality Questionnaire (BPQ), Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS), Metacognitive Questionnaire (MCQ-30), Urgency premeditation perseverance sensation seeking - impulsive behavior scale - short version (UPPS-S), and Scale to assess unawareness of mental disorder (SUMD) were applied to assess severity symptomatology, cognitive insight, metacognition, impulsivity and clinical insight, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age ± SD of subject was 22.19 ± 3.79, with a female preponderance (N = 61, 75.3%). The mean ± SD of BCIS, MCQ-30, UPPS-S, SUMD, and BPQ was 7.78 ± 4.11, 66.96 ± 14.95, 50.98 ± 11.72, 5.53 ± 2.36, and 57.56 ± 9.00, respectively. The cognitive (BCIS) and clinical insight (SUMD) were significantly correlated (r = -0.26, P = 0.01). The impulsivity (UPPS) was also positively correlated with BPQ, (r = 0.26, <i>P</i> = 0.01). In regression analysis, a significant negative relation was observed with MCQ-30 (Cognitive self-consciousness) (β = -0.341, 95% CI = -1.022 to - 0.186, <i>P</i> = 0.005) when predicting BPQ. A significant negative relation of Negative urgency with BCIS (β = -0.339, 95% CI = -0.703 to - 0.054, <i>P</i> = 0.023) and a positive relation with SUMD (β =0.331, 95% CI = 0.032 to 0.392, <i>P</i> = 0.022) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study can be used in clinical practice by strengthening existing therapies aiming at these areas and thereby enhancing therapeutic alliance, adherence, and prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13534,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_348_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Borderline personality disorder (BLPD) is one of the most common personalities disorders frequently encountered in the outpatient setup.
Aim: Understanding the role of impulsivity and metacognition in clinical and cognitive insight among BLPD patients.
Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was performed among 81 patients diagnosed with BLPD. Sociodemographic details were collected, and the Borderline Personality Questionnaire (BPQ), Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS), Metacognitive Questionnaire (MCQ-30), Urgency premeditation perseverance sensation seeking - impulsive behavior scale - short version (UPPS-S), and Scale to assess unawareness of mental disorder (SUMD) were applied to assess severity symptomatology, cognitive insight, metacognition, impulsivity and clinical insight, respectively.
Results: The mean age ± SD of subject was 22.19 ± 3.79, with a female preponderance (N = 61, 75.3%). The mean ± SD of BCIS, MCQ-30, UPPS-S, SUMD, and BPQ was 7.78 ± 4.11, 66.96 ± 14.95, 50.98 ± 11.72, 5.53 ± 2.36, and 57.56 ± 9.00, respectively. The cognitive (BCIS) and clinical insight (SUMD) were significantly correlated (r = -0.26, P = 0.01). The impulsivity (UPPS) was also positively correlated with BPQ, (r = 0.26, P = 0.01). In regression analysis, a significant negative relation was observed with MCQ-30 (Cognitive self-consciousness) (β = -0.341, 95% CI = -1.022 to - 0.186, P = 0.005) when predicting BPQ. A significant negative relation of Negative urgency with BCIS (β = -0.339, 95% CI = -0.703 to - 0.054, P = 0.023) and a positive relation with SUMD (β =0.331, 95% CI = 0.032 to 0.392, P = 0.022) were obtained.
Conclusion: The results of this study can be used in clinical practice by strengthening existing therapies aiming at these areas and thereby enhancing therapeutic alliance, adherence, and prognosis.