Understanding the metacognition and impulsivity issues with clinical and cognitive insight in borderline personality disorder - A cross sectional study.

Industrial Psychiatry Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.4103/ipj.ipj_348_24
Rajnish Raj, Aaliya Khanam, Zaid A Wani, Afifa Afreen, Simranjeet Kour, Ajaz A Khan, Inaamul Haq
{"title":"Understanding the metacognition and impulsivity issues with clinical and cognitive insight in borderline personality disorder - A cross sectional study.","authors":"Rajnish Raj, Aaliya Khanam, Zaid A Wani, Afifa Afreen, Simranjeet Kour, Ajaz A Khan, Inaamul Haq","doi":"10.4103/ipj.ipj_348_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Borderline personality disorder (BLPD) is one of the most common personalities disorders frequently encountered in the outpatient setup.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Understanding the role of impulsivity and metacognition in clinical and cognitive insight among BLPD patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed among 81 patients diagnosed with BLPD. Sociodemographic details were collected, and the Borderline Personality Questionnaire (BPQ), Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS), Metacognitive Questionnaire (MCQ-30), Urgency premeditation perseverance sensation seeking - impulsive behavior scale - short version (UPPS-S), and Scale to assess unawareness of mental disorder (SUMD) were applied to assess severity symptomatology, cognitive insight, metacognition, impulsivity and clinical insight, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age ± SD of subject was 22.19 ± 3.79, with a female preponderance (N = 61, 75.3%). The mean ± SD of BCIS, MCQ-30, UPPS-S, SUMD, and BPQ was 7.78 ± 4.11, 66.96 ± 14.95, 50.98 ± 11.72, 5.53 ± 2.36, and 57.56 ± 9.00, respectively. The cognitive (BCIS) and clinical insight (SUMD) were significantly correlated (r = -0.26, P = 0.01). The impulsivity (UPPS) was also positively correlated with BPQ, (r = 0.26, <i>P</i> = 0.01). In regression analysis, a significant negative relation was observed with MCQ-30 (Cognitive self-consciousness) (β = -0.341, 95% CI = -1.022 to - 0.186, <i>P</i> = 0.005) when predicting BPQ. A significant negative relation of Negative urgency with BCIS (β = -0.339, 95% CI = -0.703 to - 0.054, <i>P</i> = 0.023) and a positive relation with SUMD (β =0.331, 95% CI = 0.032 to 0.392, <i>P</i> = 0.022) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study can be used in clinical practice by strengthening existing therapies aiming at these areas and thereby enhancing therapeutic alliance, adherence, and prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13534,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_348_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Borderline personality disorder (BLPD) is one of the most common personalities disorders frequently encountered in the outpatient setup.

Aim: Understanding the role of impulsivity and metacognition in clinical and cognitive insight among BLPD patients.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was performed among 81 patients diagnosed with BLPD. Sociodemographic details were collected, and the Borderline Personality Questionnaire (BPQ), Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS), Metacognitive Questionnaire (MCQ-30), Urgency premeditation perseverance sensation seeking - impulsive behavior scale - short version (UPPS-S), and Scale to assess unawareness of mental disorder (SUMD) were applied to assess severity symptomatology, cognitive insight, metacognition, impulsivity and clinical insight, respectively.

Results: The mean age ± SD of subject was 22.19 ± 3.79, with a female preponderance (N = 61, 75.3%). The mean ± SD of BCIS, MCQ-30, UPPS-S, SUMD, and BPQ was 7.78 ± 4.11, 66.96 ± 14.95, 50.98 ± 11.72, 5.53 ± 2.36, and 57.56 ± 9.00, respectively. The cognitive (BCIS) and clinical insight (SUMD) were significantly correlated (r = -0.26, P = 0.01). The impulsivity (UPPS) was also positively correlated with BPQ, (r = 0.26, P = 0.01). In regression analysis, a significant negative relation was observed with MCQ-30 (Cognitive self-consciousness) (β = -0.341, 95% CI = -1.022 to - 0.186, P = 0.005) when predicting BPQ. A significant negative relation of Negative urgency with BCIS (β = -0.339, 95% CI = -0.703 to - 0.054, P = 0.023) and a positive relation with SUMD (β =0.331, 95% CI = 0.032 to 0.392, P = 0.022) were obtained.

Conclusion: The results of this study can be used in clinical practice by strengthening existing therapies aiming at these areas and thereby enhancing therapeutic alliance, adherence, and prognosis.

了解边缘型人格障碍的元认知和冲动问题的临床和认知洞察力-一项横断面研究。
背景:边缘型人格障碍(BLPD)是门诊最常见的人格障碍之一。目的:了解冲动性和元认知在BLPD患者临床和认知洞察力中的作用。材料和方法:对81例诊断为BLPD的患者进行横断面研究。收集社会人口学资料,分别采用边缘性人格问卷(BPQ)、贝克认知洞察量表(BCIS)、元认知问卷(MCQ-30)、紧急预判坚持、感觉寻求-冲动行为简易量表(UPPS-S)和精神障碍无意识评定量表(SUMD)对患者的严重症状、认知洞察、元认知、冲动性和临床洞察进行评估。结果:患者平均年龄±SD为22.19±3.79,女性居多(N = 61, 75.3%)。BCIS、MCQ-30、UPPS-S、SUMD、BPQ的平均±SD分别为7.78±4.11、66.96±14.95、50.98±11.72、5.53±2.36、57.56±9.00。认知能力(BCIS)与临床洞察力(SUMD)显著相关(r = -0.26, P = 0.01)。冲动性(UPPS)与BPQ呈正相关(r = 0.26, P = 0.01)。在回归分析中,MCQ-30 (Cognitive self-consciousness,认知自我意识)对BPQ的预测呈显著负相关(β = -0.341, 95% CI = -1.022 ~ - 0.186, P = 0.005)。阴性急迫性与BCIS呈显著负相关(β = -0.339, 95% CI = -0.703 ~ - 0.054, P = 0.023),与SUMD呈正相关(β =0.331, 95% CI = 0.032 ~ 0.392, P = 0.022)。结论:本研究结果可用于临床实践,加强针对这些领域的现有治疗,从而提高治疗联盟性、依从性和预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信