Preoperative psychotherapy for primary total hip arthroplasty patients: an evaluation of its modifiability on readmissions and implant complications in patients who have depression.
Adam M Gordon, Patrick Nian, Joydeep Baidya, Michael A Mont
{"title":"Preoperative psychotherapy for primary total hip arthroplasty patients: an evaluation of its modifiability on readmissions and implant complications in patients who have depression.","authors":"Adam M Gordon, Patrick Nian, Joydeep Baidya, Michael A Mont","doi":"10.1177/11207000251317655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few studies have evaluated nonpharmacologic interventions, including preoperative psychotherapy, in patients who have depression. We studied whether psychotherapy visits prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with depression were associated with lower: (1) readmissions; and (2) implant complications in patients who have depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide database was queried from 2010 to 2021. Patients who had depression were 1:1 propensity score matched based on those who had (<i>n</i> <i>=</i> 16,143) and did not have (<i>n</i> <i>=</i> 16,140) preoperative psychotherapy visits within 3 months of primary THA. These depression patients were 1:5 ratio-matched to a control cohort of patients without comorbid depression (<i>n</i> <i>=</i> 80,627). A 90-day and 2-year follow-up surveillance period was used to evaluate readmissions and implant complications, respectively. Logistic regression models computed the odds ratios (OR) of psychotherapy on readmissions and implant complications. Patients without comorbid depression served as the reference cohort. <i>p</i>-Values less than 0.001 were significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of patients who had depression, a stepwise increase in odds of readmissions occurred for patients who had psychotherapy (6.2 vs. 5.0%, OR 1.25; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and did not have psychotherapy (6.7 vs. 5.0%, OR 1.36; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) compared to patients who did not have depression. Compared to patients who did not have depression, patients who had depression and did not have psychotherapy experienced greater odds of aseptic loosening (1.7 vs. 0.7%, OR 2.31; <i>p</i> <i><</i> 0.0001), periprosthetic fractures (0.5 versus 0.2%, OR 2.44; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), dislocations (3.7 vs. 1.6%, OR 2.39; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) (3.1 vs. 1.7%, OR 1.93; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and all-cause THA revisions (3.6 vs. 1.5%, OR 2.44; <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Preoperative psychotherapy may provide a modifiable benefit among patients who had depression for 2-year implant complications. This intervention may aid arthroplasty surgeons in optimising patients potentially at higher risk for adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":"35 3","pages":"239-246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000251317655","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Few studies have evaluated nonpharmacologic interventions, including preoperative psychotherapy, in patients who have depression. We studied whether psychotherapy visits prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with depression were associated with lower: (1) readmissions; and (2) implant complications in patients who have depression.
Methods: A nationwide database was queried from 2010 to 2021. Patients who had depression were 1:1 propensity score matched based on those who had (n= 16,143) and did not have (n= 16,140) preoperative psychotherapy visits within 3 months of primary THA. These depression patients were 1:5 ratio-matched to a control cohort of patients without comorbid depression (n= 80,627). A 90-day and 2-year follow-up surveillance period was used to evaluate readmissions and implant complications, respectively. Logistic regression models computed the odds ratios (OR) of psychotherapy on readmissions and implant complications. Patients without comorbid depression served as the reference cohort. p-Values less than 0.001 were significant.
Results: Of patients who had depression, a stepwise increase in odds of readmissions occurred for patients who had psychotherapy (6.2 vs. 5.0%, OR 1.25; p < 0.0001) and did not have psychotherapy (6.7 vs. 5.0%, OR 1.36; p < 0.0001) compared to patients who did not have depression. Compared to patients who did not have depression, patients who had depression and did not have psychotherapy experienced greater odds of aseptic loosening (1.7 vs. 0.7%, OR 2.31; p< 0.0001), periprosthetic fractures (0.5 versus 0.2%, OR 2.44; p < 0.0001), dislocations (3.7 vs. 1.6%, OR 2.39; p < 0.0001), periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) (3.1 vs. 1.7%, OR 1.93; p < 0.0001), and all-cause THA revisions (3.6 vs. 1.5%, OR 2.44; p < 0.0001).
Discussion: Preoperative psychotherapy may provide a modifiable benefit among patients who had depression for 2-year implant complications. This intervention may aid arthroplasty surgeons in optimising patients potentially at higher risk for adverse events.
期刊介绍:
HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice.
The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit.
HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are:
• Biomaterials
• Biomechanics
• Conservative Hip Surgery
• Paediatrics
• Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty
• Traumatology