Can preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters predict the molecular subtype of breast cancer?

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian journal of cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-16 DOI:10.4103/ijc.ijc_1412_21
Mehmet Esat Duymus, Abdullah Bulgurcu, Umit Ogur, Sirma Ercan, Abidin Kilincer
{"title":"Can preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters predict the molecular subtype of breast cancer?","authors":"Mehmet Esat Duymus, Abdullah Bulgurcu, Umit Ogur, Sirma Ercan, Abidin Kilincer","doi":"10.4103/ijc.ijc_1412_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of metabolic parameters in detecting invasive breast cancer molecular subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 112 patients who had a preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) scan and were operated on with a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer between January 2017 and August 2020. We evaluated associations among maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and clinicopathological findings by dividing the specimen into three tumor subtypes according to estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-2) expressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference between the three groups in the SUVmax value of axillary lymph node metastasis (P = 0.014), but no significant difference was revealed for TLG and MTV (P = 0.858 and P = 0.083, respectively). There was a significant difference between groups in SUVmax and TLG (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively) for the primary tumor, but no significant difference was observed in MTV (P = 0.051).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We suggest that primary tumor SUVmax can be used to differentiate triple-negative patients from other subgroups, and primary tumor TLG can be used to distinguish hormone receptor positive (HR+) patients from other subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":13505,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of cancer","volume":"62 1","pages":"96-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.ijc_1412_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of metabolic parameters in detecting invasive breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Methods: We enrolled 112 patients who had a preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) scan and were operated on with a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer between January 2017 and August 2020. We evaluated associations among maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and clinicopathological findings by dividing the specimen into three tumor subtypes according to estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-2) expressions.

Results: There was a significant difference between the three groups in the SUVmax value of axillary lymph node metastasis (P = 0.014), but no significant difference was revealed for TLG and MTV (P = 0.858 and P = 0.083, respectively). There was a significant difference between groups in SUVmax and TLG (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively) for the primary tumor, but no significant difference was observed in MTV (P = 0.051).

Conclusion: We suggest that primary tumor SUVmax can be used to differentiate triple-negative patients from other subgroups, and primary tumor TLG can be used to distinguish hormone receptor positive (HR+) patients from other subgroups.

术前18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描参数能否预测乳腺癌的分子亚型?
背景:本研究旨在评价代谢参数在检测浸润性乳腺癌分子亚型中的预测价值。方法:纳入112例术前行18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(18F-FDG PET-CT),并于2017年1月至2020年8月期间诊断为浸润性乳腺癌进行手术的患者。我们根据雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和人表皮生长因子受体(HER-2)的表达将标本分为三种肿瘤亚型,评估了最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)、病变总糖酵解(TLG)和临床病理结果之间的关系。结果:三组腋窝淋巴结转移SUVmax值差异有统计学意义(P = 0.014),而TLG和MTV无统计学意义(P = 0.858和P = 0.083)。原发肿瘤SUVmax和TLG组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001和P = 0.001), MTV组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.051)。结论:原发性肿瘤SUVmax可用于区分三阴性患者与其他亚组,原发性肿瘤TLG可用于区分激素受体阳性(HR+)患者与其他亚组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian journal of cancer
Indian journal of cancer Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Cancer (ISSN 0019-509X), the show window of the progress of ontological sciences in India, was established in 1963. Indian Journal of Cancer is the first and only periodical serving the needs of all the specialties of oncology in India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信