Volume-controlled inverse ratio ventilation improves safe apnea time in obese patients during the induction of general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1574634
Yonghai Zhang, Bin Li, Chang Xu, Yan Wu, Ling Ma, Fan Yang, Hanxiang Ma, Xinli Ni
{"title":"Volume-controlled inverse ratio ventilation improves safe apnea time in obese patients during the induction of general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yonghai Zhang, Bin Li, Chang Xu, Yan Wu, Ling Ma, Fan Yang, Hanxiang Ma, Xinli Ni","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1574634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inverse ratio ventilation theoretically increases oxygenation in obese patients. However, it is unknown whether the use of inverse ratio ventilation prolongs the safe apnea time during the induction of anesthesia. The primary objective of our study was to compare the safe apnea time between obese surgical patients receiving inverse ratio ventilation and conventional ratio ventilation during the induction of anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Forty obese patients who underwent elective operation under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were randomly allocated into the conventional ratio ventilation (CRV) group (<i>n</i> = 20) and inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) group (<i>n</i> = 20). After the patients were preoxygenated through a face mask for 3 min, anesthesia induction was performed. When the patients lost consciousness and spontaneous breathing disappeared, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation was performed for 5 min, and the inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio was set as 1:2 in the CRV group and 2:1 in the IRV group. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse oxygen saturation were recorded at four time points: (i) before pre-oxygenation (T<sub>0</sub>), (ii) pre-oxygenation for 3 min (T<sub>1</sub>), (iii) non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for 3 min (T<sub>2</sub>), and (iv) non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for 5 min (T<sub>3</sub>). Arterial blood was collected at T<sub>0</sub>, T<sub>1</sub>, and T<sub>3</sub> for arterial blood gas analysis, and arterial oxygen partial pressure and carbon dioxide partial pressure were recorded. The patient's expiratory oxygen fraction at T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, and T<sub>3</sub> were recorded. Peak airway pressure, plateau pressure and mean airway pressure were record at T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>3</sub>. The safe apnea time was recorded in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients completed the study. Baseline parameters were comparable between the two groups. Safe apnea time was significantly longer (210.40 ± 47.47 vs. 153.80 ± 41.54 s, mean difference [95% CI], 56.55 [28.00-85.10], <i>p</i> = 0.0003) and the expired O<sub>2</sub> fraction was higher (87.60 ± 2.39 vs. 91.60 ± 1.79, mean difference [95% CI], 4.00 [2.65-5.35], <i>p</i> < 0.0001) at T<sub>3</sub> in the IRV group compared to the CRV group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Volume-controlled inverse ratio ventilation at an I:E ratio of 2:1, compared to conventional ratio ventilation, provided a longer safe apnea time and higher expired O<sub>2</sub> fraction in obese patients during the induction of anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1574634"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1574634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inverse ratio ventilation theoretically increases oxygenation in obese patients. However, it is unknown whether the use of inverse ratio ventilation prolongs the safe apnea time during the induction of anesthesia. The primary objective of our study was to compare the safe apnea time between obese surgical patients receiving inverse ratio ventilation and conventional ratio ventilation during the induction of anesthesia.

Methods: This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Forty obese patients who underwent elective operation under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were randomly allocated into the conventional ratio ventilation (CRV) group (n = 20) and inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) group (n = 20). After the patients were preoxygenated through a face mask for 3 min, anesthesia induction was performed. When the patients lost consciousness and spontaneous breathing disappeared, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation was performed for 5 min, and the inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio was set as 1:2 in the CRV group and 2:1 in the IRV group. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse oxygen saturation were recorded at four time points: (i) before pre-oxygenation (T0), (ii) pre-oxygenation for 3 min (T1), (iii) non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for 3 min (T2), and (iv) non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for 5 min (T3). Arterial blood was collected at T0, T1, and T3 for arterial blood gas analysis, and arterial oxygen partial pressure and carbon dioxide partial pressure were recorded. The patient's expiratory oxygen fraction at T1, T2, and T3 were recorded. Peak airway pressure, plateau pressure and mean airway pressure were record at T2 and T3. The safe apnea time was recorded in both groups.

Results: Forty patients completed the study. Baseline parameters were comparable between the two groups. Safe apnea time was significantly longer (210.40 ± 47.47 vs. 153.80 ± 41.54 s, mean difference [95% CI], 56.55 [28.00-85.10], p = 0.0003) and the expired O2 fraction was higher (87.60 ± 2.39 vs. 91.60 ± 1.79, mean difference [95% CI], 4.00 [2.65-5.35], p < 0.0001) at T3 in the IRV group compared to the CRV group.

Conclusion: Volume-controlled inverse ratio ventilation at an I:E ratio of 2:1, compared to conventional ratio ventilation, provided a longer safe apnea time and higher expired O2 fraction in obese patients during the induction of anesthesia.

容积控制的逆比通气改善肥胖患者在全麻诱导期间的安全呼吸暂停时间:一项随机对照试验。
背景:理论上,逆比通气可增加肥胖患者的氧合。然而,在麻醉诱导过程中,使用逆比通气是否延长了安全呼吸时间尚不清楚。本研究的主要目的是比较肥胖手术患者在麻醉诱导过程中接受逆比通气和常规比通气的安全呼吸暂停时间。方法:本研究为前瞻性、随机对照试验。选择40例全麻择期手术合并气管插管的肥胖患者,随机分为常规比例通气(CRV)组(n = 20)和反比例通气(n = 20)。患者通过面罩预充氧3 min后,进行麻醉诱导。当患者失去意识,自主呼吸消失时,进行无创正压通气5 min, CRV组吸气呼气比(I:E)为1:2,IRV组为2:1。记录4个时间点的心率、收缩压、舒张压和脉搏血氧饱和度:(i)预充氧前(T0), (ii)预充氧3 min (T1), (iii)无创正压通气3 min (T2), (iv)无创正压通气5 min (T3)。于T0、T1、T3采集动脉血进行动脉血气分析,记录动脉血氧分压、二氧化碳分压。记录患者T1、T2、T3时的呼气氧分数。在T2和T3记录气道峰值压力、平台压力和平均气道压力。记录两组患者的安全呼吸时间。结果:40例患者完成了研究。两组的基线参数具有可比性。安全呼吸暂停时间大大延长(210.40 ±  47.47和153.80±41.54  年代,平均差(95%置信区间),56.55 (28.00 - -85.10),0.0003 p = )和过期的O2分数较高(87.60 ±2.39 vs 91.60  ± 1.79,平均差(95%置信区间),4.00 (2.65 - -5.35),p 3 IRV组相比,CRV组。结论:与常规比例通气相比,I:E比为2:1的容积控制逆比通气在诱导麻醉过程中为肥胖患者提供了更长的安全呼吸时间和更高的过期氧分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信