Galvanic vestibular stimulation for Mal de Debarquement syndrome: a pilot study on therapeutic potential.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Catho Schoenmaekers, Dario De Smet, Stefaan Peeters, Andrzej Zarowski, Choi Deblieck, Floris L Wuyts
{"title":"Galvanic vestibular stimulation for Mal de Debarquement syndrome: a pilot study on therapeutic potential.","authors":"Catho Schoenmaekers, Dario De Smet, Stefaan Peeters, Andrzej Zarowski, Choi Deblieck, Floris L Wuyts","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07102-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mal de Debarquement Syndrome (MdDS) is a debilitating neuro-otological disorder causing a persistent sensation of self-motion, often triggered by passive motion like being on a boat (MT-MdDS) or non-motion triggered (non-MT MdDS). Due to the unknown pathophysiological mechanism, available treatment options for managing symptoms are limited. Within the framework of a pilot study, our objective was to investigate the effect, safety, and feasibility of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as a potential alternative treatment option for MdDS. The trial included 12 MdDS patients and 12 controls. In Part 1, the perceptual threshold for movement perception was determined using both sine and noisy (white noise) GVS for both patients and controls. In Part 2, patients received up to eight four-minute GVS at varying intensities, determined by their individual threshold, during both sine and noisy GVS (i.e., at their threshold, 120%, 70%, and 20%). The effectiveness was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and static posturography. Five patients reported improvement with noisy GVS at 70%, two at noisy threshold, one at noise 20%, one at 120%, one at sine 20%, and one at sine 120%. Our findings show statistically significant positive trends in both subjective and objective outcome measures following specific GVS sessions. Particularly, notable improvements were observed with noisy GVS at intensities 70% and 20% below perceptual threshold levels. All patients found GVS to be safe and manageable, with no worsening of their symptoms. GVS demonstrated positive trends in posturographic stability, particularly with 70% currents and noisy GVS. While further research is necessary, the potential benefits, safety, and feasibility of GVS for MdDS patients have been demonstrated as promising.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 6","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07102-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mal de Debarquement Syndrome (MdDS) is a debilitating neuro-otological disorder causing a persistent sensation of self-motion, often triggered by passive motion like being on a boat (MT-MdDS) or non-motion triggered (non-MT MdDS). Due to the unknown pathophysiological mechanism, available treatment options for managing symptoms are limited. Within the framework of a pilot study, our objective was to investigate the effect, safety, and feasibility of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as a potential alternative treatment option for MdDS. The trial included 12 MdDS patients and 12 controls. In Part 1, the perceptual threshold for movement perception was determined using both sine and noisy (white noise) GVS for both patients and controls. In Part 2, patients received up to eight four-minute GVS at varying intensities, determined by their individual threshold, during both sine and noisy GVS (i.e., at their threshold, 120%, 70%, and 20%). The effectiveness was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and static posturography. Five patients reported improvement with noisy GVS at 70%, two at noisy threshold, one at noise 20%, one at 120%, one at sine 20%, and one at sine 120%. Our findings show statistically significant positive trends in both subjective and objective outcome measures following specific GVS sessions. Particularly, notable improvements were observed with noisy GVS at intensities 70% and 20% below perceptual threshold levels. All patients found GVS to be safe and manageable, with no worsening of their symptoms. GVS demonstrated positive trends in posturographic stability, particularly with 70% currents and noisy GVS. While further research is necessary, the potential benefits, safety, and feasibility of GVS for MdDS patients have been demonstrated as promising.

前庭电刺激治疗Debarquement综合征:治疗潜力的初步研究。
失足综合症(MdDS)是一种使人衰弱的神经-耳科疾病,引起持续的自我运动感,通常由被动运动触发,如在船上(MT-MdDS)或非运动触发(非mt MdDS)。由于未知的病理生理机制,可用的治疗方案管理症状是有限的。在一项初步研究的框架内,我们的目标是调查前庭电刺激(GVS)作为MdDS的潜在替代治疗方案的效果、安全性和可行性。该试验包括12名MdDS患者和12名对照组。在第1部分中,对患者和对照组使用正弦和噪声(白噪声)GVS确定运动感知的感知阈值。在第2部分中,患者在正弦和噪声GVS期间(即在阈值120%,70%和20%时)接受了多达8次不同强度的4分钟GVS,由他们的个体阈值决定。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和静态体位术评估疗效。5名患者报告称,噪声GVS在70%时改善,2名在噪声阈值时改善,1名在噪声20%时改善,1名在噪声120%时改善,1名在正弦20%时改善,1名在正弦120%时改善。我们的研究结果显示,在特定的GVS会议之后,主观和客观结果测量都有统计学上显著的积极趋势。特别是,当噪声GVS强度低于感知阈值水平70%和20%时,观察到显著的改善。所有患者发现GVS是安全和可控的,没有症状恶化。GVS在姿势稳定性方面表现出积极的趋势,特别是在70%电流和噪声GVS的情况下。虽然需要进一步的研究,但GVS治疗MdDS患者的潜在益处、安全性和可行性已被证明是有希望的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信