Impact of different exercise modalities on neuroendocrine well-being markers among university students: a study of renalase and catecholamine responses.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2025.1591132
Vedat Çınar, Mehmet Fırat Bağ, Mehdi Aslan, Fidan Çınar, Alessandro Gennaro, Taner Akbulut, Gian Mario Migliaccio
{"title":"Impact of different exercise modalities on neuroendocrine well-being markers among university students: a study of renalase and catecholamine responses.","authors":"Vedat Çınar, Mehmet Fırat Bağ, Mehdi Aslan, Fidan Çınar, Alessandro Gennaro, Taner Akbulut, Gian Mario Migliaccio","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1591132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Catecholamines (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine) and renalase are among the key biomolecules that regulate stress responses during exercise and support physiological adaptation. However, the effects of different exercise types on these biomolecules remain unclear. This study aims to compare the effects of aerobic, anaerobic, and strength exercises on epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was conducted using a pre-test post-test controlled experimental research design. A total of 80 healthy male participants aged 18-22 years were included and randomly assigned into four groups: control (C), aerobic exercise (A), anaerobic exercise (An), and strength training (Sa). The exercise groups followed specific training protocols for 8 weeks, 3 days per week, at the same time of the day under standardized environmental conditions. Venous blood samples were taken before and after the exercise program, and epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels were analyzed using the ELISA method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant increases in epinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels were observed depending on the exercise type (p < 0.01), while norepinephrine levels showed a significant decrease only in the aerobic exercise group (p < 0.05). Epinephrine levels increased in the aerobic (36.96%), anaerobic (35.42%), and strength training (27.45%) groups, while norepinephrine levels decreased only in the aerobic exercise group (6.38%). Dopamine levels increased in all exercise groups, with the highest change observed in the anaerobic exercise group (38.34%). Renalase levels increased in all exercise groups (p < 0.01), with the highest increase recorded in the anaerobic exercise group (29.42%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that different exercise modalities induce specific neuroendocrine responses. All exercise types led to significant increases in epinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels, with the most pronounced effects observed in the anaerobic exercise group. Strength training also produced similarly robust responses. Norepinephrine levels showed a significant decrease only in the aerobic exercise group, while non-significant reductions were observed in the other exercise groups. These findings indicate that exercise type distinctly modulates hormonal and enzymatic pathways involved in physiological adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1591132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1591132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Catecholamines (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine) and renalase are among the key biomolecules that regulate stress responses during exercise and support physiological adaptation. However, the effects of different exercise types on these biomolecules remain unclear. This study aims to compare the effects of aerobic, anaerobic, and strength exercises on epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels.

Materials and methods: This study was conducted using a pre-test post-test controlled experimental research design. A total of 80 healthy male participants aged 18-22 years were included and randomly assigned into four groups: control (C), aerobic exercise (A), anaerobic exercise (An), and strength training (Sa). The exercise groups followed specific training protocols for 8 weeks, 3 days per week, at the same time of the day under standardized environmental conditions. Venous blood samples were taken before and after the exercise program, and epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels were analyzed using the ELISA method.

Results: Significant increases in epinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels were observed depending on the exercise type (p < 0.01), while norepinephrine levels showed a significant decrease only in the aerobic exercise group (p < 0.05). Epinephrine levels increased in the aerobic (36.96%), anaerobic (35.42%), and strength training (27.45%) groups, while norepinephrine levels decreased only in the aerobic exercise group (6.38%). Dopamine levels increased in all exercise groups, with the highest change observed in the anaerobic exercise group (38.34%). Renalase levels increased in all exercise groups (p < 0.01), with the highest increase recorded in the anaerobic exercise group (29.42%).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that different exercise modalities induce specific neuroendocrine responses. All exercise types led to significant increases in epinephrine, dopamine, and renalase levels, with the most pronounced effects observed in the anaerobic exercise group. Strength training also produced similarly robust responses. Norepinephrine levels showed a significant decrease only in the aerobic exercise group, while non-significant reductions were observed in the other exercise groups. These findings indicate that exercise type distinctly modulates hormonal and enzymatic pathways involved in physiological adaptation.

不同运动方式对大学生神经内分泌健康指标的影响:renalase和儿茶酚胺反应的研究。
儿茶酚胺(肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素、多巴胺)和renalase是运动过程中调节应激反应和支持生理适应的关键生物分子。然而,不同运动类型对这些生物分子的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较有氧运动、无氧运动和力量运动对肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素、多巴胺和肾再化酶水平的影响。材料与方法:本研究采用前测后测对照实验研究设计。80名年龄在18-22岁的健康男性参与者被随机分为四组:对照组(C)、有氧运动组(A)、无氧运动组(An)和力量训练组(Sa)。运动组在标准化的环境条件下,每天同一时间,每周3天,遵循特定的训练方案,为期8周。运动前后取静脉血,采用ELISA法检测肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素、多巴胺、肾再化酶水平。结果:肾上腺素、多巴胺和renalase水平随运动类型的不同而显著升高(p < 0.01),而去甲肾上腺素水平仅在有氧运动组显著降低(p < 0.05)。有氧运动组、无氧运动组和力量训练组的肾上腺素水平均有升高(36.96%),而去甲肾上腺素水平仅在有氧运动组下降(6.38%)。多巴胺水平在所有运动组中都有所增加,无氧运动组的变化最大(38.34%)。Renalase水平在所有运动组均升高(p < 0.01),以无氧运动组升高最高(29.42%)。结论:本研究表明,不同的运动方式可诱导特定的神经内分泌反应。所有运动类型都会导致肾上腺素、多巴胺和肾再化酶水平的显著增加,其中无氧运动组的效果最为明显。力量训练也产生了类似的强烈反应。去甲肾上腺素水平只有在有氧运动组有显著下降,而在其他运动组没有明显下降。这些结果表明,运动类型明显调节参与生理适应的激素和酶途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信