Environmental footprint of a colonoscopy procedure: Life cycle assessment.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2570-6599
Paulina Lämmer, Dorien Oomkens, Tim Stobernack, Marjolijn Duijvestein
{"title":"Environmental footprint of a colonoscopy procedure: Life cycle assessment.","authors":"Paulina Lämmer, Dorien Oomkens, Tim Stobernack, Marjolijn Duijvestein","doi":"10.1055/a-2570-6599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Gastroenterology is a specialty that has evolved rapidly over time, especially in terms of advancements in endoscopic procedures. However, these advancements also present challenges, given the substantial resource demands associated with endoscopy procedures. Numerous actions could be taken to develop a resilient healthcare system that consumes as few resources as possible, but recommendations are needed to prioritize which processes could be improved. We aimed to evaluate the environmental footprint of a colonoscopy procedure, and to identify the main contributing impact process categories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center observational study was conducted at a Dutch university hospital. No clinical patient data were collected, but the colonoscopy procedure was studied. Data were collected during 13 colonoscopies. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to calculate environmental impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Damage to human health from one colonoscopy was 11.3·10 <sup>-5</sup> disability-adjusted life-years, equivalent to 1 hour. A single colonoscopy resulted in emission of 56.4 kg of CO <sub>2</sub> -equivalent (CO <sub>2</sub> eq), equal to driving a car for 255 km or 55 days of emissions for an average European household. Transportation of patients and staff (76.5%) and disposables (13.5%) were the greatest contributors to damage to human health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the 13 colonoscopies studied, the environmental impact was mainly attributable to transportation of patients and staff, and disposables. Therefore, raising awareness about the impact of transportation by car, and reducing resource consumption, particularly of disposable products, should be prioritized. Implementing alternatives to colonoscopy, such as intestinal ultrasound, could reduce the environmental footprint of the healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25706599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2570-6599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Gastroenterology is a specialty that has evolved rapidly over time, especially in terms of advancements in endoscopic procedures. However, these advancements also present challenges, given the substantial resource demands associated with endoscopy procedures. Numerous actions could be taken to develop a resilient healthcare system that consumes as few resources as possible, but recommendations are needed to prioritize which processes could be improved. We aimed to evaluate the environmental footprint of a colonoscopy procedure, and to identify the main contributing impact process categories.

Methods: A single-center observational study was conducted at a Dutch university hospital. No clinical patient data were collected, but the colonoscopy procedure was studied. Data were collected during 13 colonoscopies. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to calculate environmental impact.

Results: Damage to human health from one colonoscopy was 11.3·10 -5 disability-adjusted life-years, equivalent to 1 hour. A single colonoscopy resulted in emission of 56.4 kg of CO 2 -equivalent (CO 2 eq), equal to driving a car for 255 km or 55 days of emissions for an average European household. Transportation of patients and staff (76.5%) and disposables (13.5%) were the greatest contributors to damage to human health.

Conclusions: Among the 13 colonoscopies studied, the environmental impact was mainly attributable to transportation of patients and staff, and disposables. Therefore, raising awareness about the impact of transportation by car, and reducing resource consumption, particularly of disposable products, should be prioritized. Implementing alternatives to colonoscopy, such as intestinal ultrasound, could reduce the environmental footprint of the healthcare system.

结肠镜检查过程的环境足迹:生命周期评估。
背景和研究目的:胃肠病学是一门随着时间的推移而迅速发展的专业,特别是在内窥镜手术方面的进步。然而,考虑到与内窥镜检查相关的大量资源需求,这些进步也带来了挑战。可以采取许多行动来开发一个有弹性的医疗保健系统,以消耗尽可能少的资源,但需要提出建议,优先考虑哪些流程可以改进。我们的目的是评估结肠镜检查过程的环境足迹,并确定主要的影响过程类别。方法:在荷兰某大学医院进行单中心观察性研究。没有收集临床患者资料,但对结肠镜检查过程进行了研究。在13次结肠镜检查中收集数据。采用生命周期评价法(LCA)计算环境影响。结果:一次结肠镜检查对人体健康的损害为11.3·10 -5残疾调整生命年,相当于1小时。一次结肠镜检查产生56.4千克二氧化碳当量(CO 2 eq),相当于驾驶汽车255公里或一个普通欧洲家庭55天的排放量。患者和工作人员的运输(76.5%)和一次性用品(13.5%)是对人体健康损害最大的贡献者。结论:在研究的13例结肠镜检查中,环境影响主要归因于患者和工作人员的运输以及一次性用品。因此,提高人们对汽车交通影响的认识,减少资源消耗,特别是一次性产品的消耗,应该是优先考虑的问题。实施结肠镜检查的替代方案,如肠道超声,可以减少医疗保健系统的环境足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信