Sébastien Kindt, Michele Vanhooren, Pieter Jan Poortmans, Karlien François
{"title":"Retrospective case-control study of the impact of dialysis on bowel preparation scores.","authors":"Sébastien Kindt, Michele Vanhooren, Pieter Jan Poortmans, Karlien François","doi":"10.1055/a-2565-8022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Inadequate bowel preparation (BP) negatively affects diagnostic performance of colonoscopy. Most trials assessing adequacy of bowel preparation regimens have excluded patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially patients on dialysis. This study aimed to assess the impact of dialysis on BP quality and adenoma detection rate (ADR) and identify factors related to quality of BP.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively compared patient-specific, preparation-specific (preparation solution, preparation regimen (split-dose vs. 1-day preparation, outpatient preparation), and colonoscopy-specific data (indication, Boston Bowel Preparation Score [BBPS], sedation type, presence of adenoma or cancer) between 79 patients on dialysis and 158 matched controls. Adequate BP was defined as a BBPS score ≧2 in every colonic segment. Significant contributors to BP were assessed by logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite matching, dialysis patients were significantly older (69.0 ± 11.9 vs 64.2 ± 14.6, <i>P</i> = 0.008) and less frequently women (30% vs 52%, <i>P</i> = 0.002). There was no significant difference in BP or ADR between patients on dialysis and controls (85% vs 89%, <i>P</i> = 0.39 and 35% vs 35%, <i>P</i> = 1.00, respectively). Older age ( <i>P</i> = 0.03), lower body mass index ( <i>P</i> = 0.03), type of BP regimen ( <i>P</i> <0.001), outpatient preparation ( <i>P</i> = 0.03), and residency in residential care ( <i>P</i> = 0.05) were significantly associated with BP adequacy. According to the logistic regression model, split-dose regimen was the main predictor of adequate BP ( <i>P</i> <0.001, odds ratio 3.1 [1.65-5.81]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Safe and adequate BP is achievable in dialysis patients. Bowel preparation regimen rather than treatment with dialysis influences BP quality. Split-dose preparation remains the most important determinant of adequate BP for colonoscopy, irrespective of regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25658022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2565-8022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and study aims: Inadequate bowel preparation (BP) negatively affects diagnostic performance of colonoscopy. Most trials assessing adequacy of bowel preparation regimens have excluded patients affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially patients on dialysis. This study aimed to assess the impact of dialysis on BP quality and adenoma detection rate (ADR) and identify factors related to quality of BP.
Patients and methods: We retrospectively compared patient-specific, preparation-specific (preparation solution, preparation regimen (split-dose vs. 1-day preparation, outpatient preparation), and colonoscopy-specific data (indication, Boston Bowel Preparation Score [BBPS], sedation type, presence of adenoma or cancer) between 79 patients on dialysis and 158 matched controls. Adequate BP was defined as a BBPS score ≧2 in every colonic segment. Significant contributors to BP were assessed by logistic regression.
Results: Despite matching, dialysis patients were significantly older (69.0 ± 11.9 vs 64.2 ± 14.6, P = 0.008) and less frequently women (30% vs 52%, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in BP or ADR between patients on dialysis and controls (85% vs 89%, P = 0.39 and 35% vs 35%, P = 1.00, respectively). Older age ( P = 0.03), lower body mass index ( P = 0.03), type of BP regimen ( P <0.001), outpatient preparation ( P = 0.03), and residency in residential care ( P = 0.05) were significantly associated with BP adequacy. According to the logistic regression model, split-dose regimen was the main predictor of adequate BP ( P <0.001, odds ratio 3.1 [1.65-5.81]).
Conclusions: Safe and adequate BP is achievable in dialysis patients. Bowel preparation regimen rather than treatment with dialysis influences BP quality. Split-dose preparation remains the most important determinant of adequate BP for colonoscopy, irrespective of regimen.
背景和研究目的:肠道准备不足(BP)对结肠镜检查的诊断效果有负面影响。大多数评估肠道准备方案充分性的试验都排除了受慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)影响的患者,特别是透析患者。本研究旨在评估透析对血压质量和腺瘤检出率(ADR)的影响,并确定与血压质量相关的因素。患者和方法:我们回顾性比较了79名透析患者和158名匹配对照者的患者特异性、制备特异性(制备溶液、制备方案(分次给药vs. 1天制备、门诊准备)和结肠镜特异性数据(适应症、波士顿肠准备评分[BBPS]、镇静类型、腺瘤或癌症的存在)。以结肠各节段BBPS评分≧2为适宜血压。通过逻辑回归对BP的显著影响因素进行评估。结果:尽管有匹配,但透析患者明显年龄较大(69.0±11.9 vs 64.2±14.6,P = 0.008),女性较少(30% vs 52%, P = 0.002)。透析组和对照组的血压和不良反应无显著差异(分别为85% vs 89%, P = 0.39和35% vs 35%, P = 1.00)。年龄(P = 0.03)、低体重指数(P = 0.03)、降压方案类型(P = 0.03)和住院护理(P = 0.05)与降压充分性显著相关。根据logistic回归模型,分次给药方案是血压适足的主要预测因子(P)。结论:透析患者血压安全、适足是可以实现的。肠道准备方案比透析治疗更能影响血压质量。无论何种治疗方案,分次给药仍然是结肠镜检查是否有足够血压的最重要决定因素。