Interobserver variability in lymph node evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography in cholangiocarcinoma.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2577-5449
David Michaël de Jong, Daniëlle Roosterman, Marco J Bruno, Lydi M J W van Driel, Wim J Lammers
{"title":"Interobserver variability in lymph node evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography in cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"David Michaël de Jong, Daniëlle Roosterman, Marco J Bruno, Lydi M J W van Driel, Wim J Lammers","doi":"10.1055/a-2577-5449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Accurate preoperative lymph node (LN) assessment is crucial for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) because presence of LN metastases significantly reduces survival rates and can contraindicate surgical resection. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) provides a reliable method for LN assessment with the advantage of enabling tissue acquisition for pathological confirmation. This study aimed to assess interobserver agreement among endosonographers in evaluating LN characteristics in patients with iCCA and pCCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among 24 endosonographers. Participants reviewed 42 EUS images from iCCA and pCCA patients, classifying LNs based on six characteristics (demarcation, shape, echogenicity, homogeneity, suspiciousness, and need to retrieve tissue). Interobserver agreement was determined using Light's kappa statistics. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in identifying malignant LNs were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall kappa values indicated moderate to fair agreement on LN characteristics, with Kappa values of 0.24 for demarcation, 0.45 for shape, 0.38 for echogenicity, 0.52 for homogeneity, and 0.36 for suspiciousness. Overall accuracy of endosonographers in correctly identifying malignant LNs was 62%, with individual accuracy ranging from 44 to 75%. Sensitivity was 60% (range: 29%-90%) and specificity was 64% (range: 28%-89%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endosonographic assessment of LN morphology and characterization demonstrates considerable variability among endosonographers. Thus, there is a clear need for standardization in preoperative LN evaluation, including establishing consensus about when to perform tissue acquisition, based on objective criteria such as short-axis diameter. Further research is required to refine and optimize these guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25775449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2577-5449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Accurate preoperative lymph node (LN) assessment is crucial for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) because presence of LN metastases significantly reduces survival rates and can contraindicate surgical resection. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) provides a reliable method for LN assessment with the advantage of enabling tissue acquisition for pathological confirmation. This study aimed to assess interobserver agreement among endosonographers in evaluating LN characteristics in patients with iCCA and pCCA.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among 24 endosonographers. Participants reviewed 42 EUS images from iCCA and pCCA patients, classifying LNs based on six characteristics (demarcation, shape, echogenicity, homogeneity, suspiciousness, and need to retrieve tissue). Interobserver agreement was determined using Light's kappa statistics. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in identifying malignant LNs were calculated.

Results: Overall kappa values indicated moderate to fair agreement on LN characteristics, with Kappa values of 0.24 for demarcation, 0.45 for shape, 0.38 for echogenicity, 0.52 for homogeneity, and 0.36 for suspiciousness. Overall accuracy of endosonographers in correctly identifying malignant LNs was 62%, with individual accuracy ranging from 44 to 75%. Sensitivity was 60% (range: 29%-90%) and specificity was 64% (range: 28%-89%).

Conclusions: Endosonographic assessment of LN morphology and characterization demonstrates considerable variability among endosonographers. Thus, there is a clear need for standardization in preoperative LN evaluation, including establishing consensus about when to perform tissue acquisition, based on objective criteria such as short-axis diameter. Further research is required to refine and optimize these guidelines.

内镜超声检查对胆管癌淋巴结评价的观察间差异。
背景和研究目的:准确的术前淋巴结(LN)评估对于肝内胆管癌(iCCA)和肝门周围胆管癌(pCCA)患者至关重要,因为淋巴结转移的存在会显著降低生存率,并且可能是手术切除的禁忌。内镜超声(EUS)为LN评估提供了一种可靠的方法,其优点是能够获得组织进行病理确认。本研究旨在评估内镜超声医师在评估iCCA和pCCA患者LN特征时的观察者间一致性。方法:对24名超声医师进行横断面调查研究。参与者回顾了来自iCCA和pCCA患者的42张EUS图像,根据6个特征(边界、形状、回声性、均匀性、可疑性和需要恢复组织)对病灶进行分类。观测者间的一致性是使用Light的kappa统计来确定的。计算识别恶性LNs的准确性、敏感性和特异性。结果:总体kappa值表明,LN特征的kappa值为中等到中等程度的一致,分界kappa值为0.24,形状kappa值为0.45,回声性kappa值为0.38,均匀性kappa值为0.52,可疑kappa值为0.36。超声检查人员正确识别恶性LNs的总体准确率为62%,个别准确率为44%至75%。敏感性为60%(范围:29%-90%),特异性为64%(范围:28%-89%)。结论:超声对LN形态和特征的评估显示超声医师之间存在相当大的差异。因此,术前LN评估显然需要标准化,包括根据短轴直径等客观标准,就何时进行组织采集达成共识。需要进一步的研究来完善和优化这些指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信