Marco Valvano, Daniele Balducci, Antonio Vinci, Andrea Ghezzi, Shirin Djahandideh, Stefano Fabiani, Gianpiero Stefanelli, Silvia Buccilli, Amedeo Montale, Filippo Antonini, Luca Maroni, Chiara Campanale
{"title":"Biliary stent insertion after stone clearance in patients awaiting cholecystectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Marco Valvano, Daniele Balducci, Antonio Vinci, Andrea Ghezzi, Shirin Djahandideh, Stefano Fabiani, Gianpiero Stefanelli, Silvia Buccilli, Amedeo Montale, Filippo Antonini, Luca Maroni, Chiara Campanale","doi":"10.1055/a-2586-6007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for patients with cholecystitis or gallbladder stones after common bile duct (CBD) clearance. According to the sequential strategy, cholecystectomy should be performed within 2 weeks after CDB clearance with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, in real-life experience, the average waiting time is 60 to 180 days. We aimed to evaluate the clinical rationale for prophylactic stent placement in CBD to prevent recurrent biliary events.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following a protocol designed a priori (PROSPERO: CRD42024564804; July 13, 2024). All published studies involving patients who had undergone ERCP for CBDs and who were awaiting cholecystectomy were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the revision process, four full texts including 755 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio (OR) for symptom recurrence in patients awaiting cholecystectomy was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-1.79; I <sup>2</sup> 67%). The pooled OR for adverse event occurrence was 0.74 (95% CI 0.45-1.24) in the stent group. The post-ERCP pancreatitis and cholangitis risk were 0.76 (95% CI 0.25-2.34) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.31-2.67), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis showed no benefit for stent insertion after bile duct clearance in patients scheduled for delayed cholecystectomy. Further randomized controlled trials with bigger cohorts are needed to assess any benefit for this procedure, which in the meantime, cannot be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25866007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2586-6007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and study aims: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for patients with cholecystitis or gallbladder stones after common bile duct (CBD) clearance. According to the sequential strategy, cholecystectomy should be performed within 2 weeks after CDB clearance with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, in real-life experience, the average waiting time is 60 to 180 days. We aimed to evaluate the clinical rationale for prophylactic stent placement in CBD to prevent recurrent biliary events.
Patients and methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following a protocol designed a priori (PROSPERO: CRD42024564804; July 13, 2024). All published studies involving patients who had undergone ERCP for CBDs and who were awaiting cholecystectomy were included.
Results: At the end of the revision process, four full texts including 755 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio (OR) for symptom recurrence in patients awaiting cholecystectomy was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-1.79; I 2 67%). The pooled OR for adverse event occurrence was 0.74 (95% CI 0.45-1.24) in the stent group. The post-ERCP pancreatitis and cholangitis risk were 0.76 (95% CI 0.25-2.34) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.31-2.67), respectively.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed no benefit for stent insertion after bile duct clearance in patients scheduled for delayed cholecystectomy. Further randomized controlled trials with bigger cohorts are needed to assess any benefit for this procedure, which in the meantime, cannot be recommended.
背景与研究目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是胆总管清扫后胆囊炎或胆囊结石患者的标准治疗方法。根据顺序策略,胆囊切除术应在CDB清除后2周内进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)。然而,在现实生活中,平均等待时间是60到180天。我们的目的是评估CBD预防性支架置入术预防复发性胆道事件的临床依据。患者和方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析是按照先验设计的方案进行的(PROSPERO: CRD42024564804;2024年7月13日)。所有已发表的涉及CBDs患者接受ERCP和等待胆囊切除术的研究均被纳入。结果:在修订过程结束时,包含755名患者的四篇全文被纳入meta分析。等待胆囊切除术患者症状复发的优势比(OR)为0.74(95%可信区间[CI] 0.30-1.79;2 . 67%)。支架组不良事件发生的总OR为0.74 (95% CI 0.45-1.24)。ercp后胰腺炎和胆管炎的风险分别为0.76 (95% CI 0.25-2.34)和0.92 (95% CI 0.31-2.67)。结论:这项荟萃分析显示,在计划进行延迟胆囊切除术的患者中,胆管清理后置入支架没有益处。需要更多的随机对照试验来评估这种方法的益处,目前还不能推荐这种方法。