A Multi-estuary assessment of pharmaceutical exposure and risk of pharmacological effects in a recreational fishery.

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J S Rehage, N A Castillo, A Distrubell, S Trabelsi, R O Santos, W R James, R J Rezek, D Cerveny, R E Boucek, A J Adams, J Fick, T Brodin
{"title":"A Multi-estuary assessment of pharmaceutical exposure and risk of pharmacological effects in a recreational fishery.","authors":"J S Rehage, N A Castillo, A Distrubell, S Trabelsi, R O Santos, W R James, R J Rezek, D Cerveny, R E Boucek, A J Adams, J Fick, T Brodin","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence of coastal and marine pharmaceutical pollution is increasing, yet most studies examining pharmaceuticals are conducted in temperate regions, while research in subtropical and tropical regions lags behind. These studies have been conducted at small spatial scales, with a need for larger spatial assessments. We examined pharmaceutical occurrence and pharmacological risk for 94 pharmaceuticals in a coastal recreational fish, red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), across nine Florida (USA) estuaries. To evaluate risk of pharmacological effects, we compared plasma concentrations to the 1/3 and to the full human therapeutic plasma concentration (HTPC). Pharmaceuticals were detected in all estuaries and in 93% of plasma samples analyzed, with an average of 2.1 pharmaceuticals per red drum. A total of 17 pharmaceuticals were detected, and dissimilarity in the pharmaceutical assemblage across estuaries was high. Cardiovascular medications, opioid pain relievers, and psychoactive medications accounted for 90.6% of detections. For pharmacological effects, we observed medium risk in 25.7% and high risk in 15.9%. of the red drum sampled. Of the 17 pharmaceuticals detected, five were observed at concentrations above the 1/3rd HTPC, with a psychoactive pharmaceutical (flupentixol) showing the highest pharmacological risk. Across estuaries, risk of pharmacological effects was observed in five of nine estuaries, with 33-60% of the red drum above the 1/3rd HTPC threshold, whereas risk was minimal in the other four estuaries (only 0-7% exceedances). Pharmacological risk was highest on the west coast of Florida, and in both large and densely-populated watersheds, as well as small and sparsely populated ones. Our findings highlight the need expand beyond documenting occurrence to estimating toxicological risk, the value of assessing internal concentrations in wild biota, and the importance of expanding the diversity of biota used in pharmaceutical studies to account for pharmacological effects in conservation and management actions, such as recreational fisheries.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence of coastal and marine pharmaceutical pollution is increasing, yet most studies examining pharmaceuticals are conducted in temperate regions, while research in subtropical and tropical regions lags behind. These studies have been conducted at small spatial scales, with a need for larger spatial assessments. We examined pharmaceutical occurrence and pharmacological risk for 94 pharmaceuticals in a coastal recreational fish, red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), across nine Florida (USA) estuaries. To evaluate risk of pharmacological effects, we compared plasma concentrations to the 1/3 and to the full human therapeutic plasma concentration (HTPC). Pharmaceuticals were detected in all estuaries and in 93% of plasma samples analyzed, with an average of 2.1 pharmaceuticals per red drum. A total of 17 pharmaceuticals were detected, and dissimilarity in the pharmaceutical assemblage across estuaries was high. Cardiovascular medications, opioid pain relievers, and psychoactive medications accounted for 90.6% of detections. For pharmacological effects, we observed medium risk in 25.7% and high risk in 15.9%. of the red drum sampled. Of the 17 pharmaceuticals detected, five were observed at concentrations above the 1/3rd HTPC, with a psychoactive pharmaceutical (flupentixol) showing the highest pharmacological risk. Across estuaries, risk of pharmacological effects was observed in five of nine estuaries, with 33-60% of the red drum above the 1/3rd HTPC threshold, whereas risk was minimal in the other four estuaries (only 0-7% exceedances). Pharmacological risk was highest on the west coast of Florida, and in both large and densely-populated watersheds, as well as small and sparsely populated ones. Our findings highlight the need expand beyond documenting occurrence to estimating toxicological risk, the value of assessing internal concentrations in wild biota, and the importance of expanding the diversity of biota used in pharmaceutical studies to account for pharmacological effects in conservation and management actions, such as recreational fisheries.

休闲渔业中药物暴露和药理作用风险的多河口评估。
沿海和海洋药物污染的证据正在增加,但大多数检查药物的研究都是在温带地区进行的,而在亚热带和热带地区的研究滞后。这些研究是在小空间尺度上进行的,需要进行更大的空间评估。我们检查了94种药物在佛罗里达(美国)九个河口的海岸休闲鱼红鼓鱼(Sciaenops ocellatus)中的药物发生率和药理学风险。为了评估药物作用的风险,我们将血浆浓度与1/3和全人治疗血浆浓度(HTPC)进行了比较。在所有河口和93%的血浆样本中检测到药物,平均每个红桶中检测到2.1种药物。共检出17种药物,各河口药物组合差异较大。心血管类药物、阿片类止痛药和精神活性药物占检出率的90.6%。在药理作用方面,25.7%为中等风险,15.9%为高危。红色鼓的采样。在检测到的17种药物中,有5种药物的浓度高于HTPC的1/3,其中一种精神活性药物(氟哌噻醇)显示出最高的药理风险。在整个河口,9个河口中有5个观察到药理作用的风险,其中33-60%的红鼓高于1/3 HTPC阈值,而其他4个河口的风险最小(仅超过0-7%)。药理学风险在佛罗里达西海岸最高,在大流域和人口密集的流域以及小流域和人口稀少的流域都是如此。我们的研究结果强调了需要从记录发生扩展到估计毒理学风险,评估野生生物群内部浓度的价值,以及扩大用于药物研究的生物群多样性以解释保护和管理行动(如休闲渔业)中的药理作用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信