Jonathon Cavaleri, Kristen Stefanescu, Darrin Lee, Xenos Mason
{"title":"Deep brain stimulation access in 2025: geographic, gender, racial, and socioeconomic disparities re-examined.","authors":"Jonathon Cavaleri, Kristen Stefanescu, Darrin Lee, Xenos Mason","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review highlights recent studies examining disparities in access to deep brain stimulation (DBS), an effective but resource-intensive therapy for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. As DBS indications expand, understanding barriers to equitable provision is increasingly urgent to ensure that all eligible patients can benefit.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Emerging literature confirms persistent disparities in DBS utilization based on geography, gender, race, and socioeconomic status. Geographic disparities reflect regional differences in healthcare infrastructure, with limited access in both rural areas of high-income countries and throughout low-income and middle-income nations. Women remain less likely than men to receive DBS for movement disorders, influenced by referral patterns, social support, and patient preference. Racial and ethnic minority patients - particularly Black and Hispanic individuals - consistently receive DBS at lower rates, in part due to reduced referrals. Socioeconomic factors, including insurance status and household income, strongly predict DBS access, favoring privately insured and wealthier patients.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>These findings underscore the need for systemic changes in referral practices, institutional policies, and healthcare funding to reduce structural barriers to DBS. Future research should focus on intersectional factors driving disparities and evaluate targeted interventions to promote equitable access.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This review highlights recent studies examining disparities in access to deep brain stimulation (DBS), an effective but resource-intensive therapy for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. As DBS indications expand, understanding barriers to equitable provision is increasingly urgent to ensure that all eligible patients can benefit.
Recent findings: Emerging literature confirms persistent disparities in DBS utilization based on geography, gender, race, and socioeconomic status. Geographic disparities reflect regional differences in healthcare infrastructure, with limited access in both rural areas of high-income countries and throughout low-income and middle-income nations. Women remain less likely than men to receive DBS for movement disorders, influenced by referral patterns, social support, and patient preference. Racial and ethnic minority patients - particularly Black and Hispanic individuals - consistently receive DBS at lower rates, in part due to reduced referrals. Socioeconomic factors, including insurance status and household income, strongly predict DBS access, favoring privately insured and wealthier patients.
Summary: These findings underscore the need for systemic changes in referral practices, institutional policies, and healthcare funding to reduce structural barriers to DBS. Future research should focus on intersectional factors driving disparities and evaluate targeted interventions to promote equitable access.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Neurology is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews; covering key subjects such as cerebrovascular disease, developmental disorders, neuroimaging and demyelinating diseases. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Neurology introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the neurology field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.