The impact of using electromyographic biofeedback on pelvic floor rehabilitation in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Clinics Pub Date : 2025-05-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100687
Camila Chaves Dos Santos Novais, Adélia Regina Oliveira da Rosa Santana, Alisson Rodrigo Moura da Paz, Aline Tenório Lins Carnaúba, Kelly Cristina Lira de Andrade, Pedro de Lemos Menezes
{"title":"The impact of using electromyographic biofeedback on pelvic floor rehabilitation in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Camila Chaves Dos Santos Novais, Adélia Regina Oliveira da Rosa Santana, Alisson Rodrigo Moura da Paz, Aline Tenório Lins Carnaúba, Kelly Cristina Lira de Andrade, Pedro de Lemos Menezes","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the impact of using electromyographic biofeedback on pelvic floor rehabilitation in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Searches in the databases were carried out: Pubmed/Medline, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and in gray literature. The study included randomized clinical trials that treated men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence using electromyographic biofeedback in pelvic rehabilitation compared to other resources or no treatment. Studies including incontinent men with sphincter implants, pharmacological treatments, or studies with incomplete data were excluded. Assessment of risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal Tool developed by Joanna Briggs Institute for randomized clinical trials and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence of meta-analysis results were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 articles were included, of which, 7 studies were subjected to two meta-analyses to assess the relative risk of men becoming continent and the reduction of urine loss through pad. Participants who received treatment showed a 1.78 times greater risk of achieving continence compared to those who did not receive treatment (RR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.29‒2.45; I<sup>2</sup> = 77%). The limitations of the present study are the lack of high-quality evidence, in which existing trials suffered from a lack of standardized outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Electromyographic biofeedback in pelvic rehabilitation seems to contribute to the faster achievement of continence in prostatectomized men compared to those who did not undergo any intervention. Additionally, helps to reduce pad weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":10472,"journal":{"name":"Clinics","volume":"80 ","pages":"100687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify the impact of using electromyographic biofeedback on pelvic floor rehabilitation in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.

Materials and methods: Searches in the databases were carried out: Pubmed/Medline, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and in gray literature. The study included randomized clinical trials that treated men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence using electromyographic biofeedback in pelvic rehabilitation compared to other resources or no treatment. Studies including incontinent men with sphincter implants, pharmacological treatments, or studies with incomplete data were excluded. Assessment of risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal Tool developed by Joanna Briggs Institute for randomized clinical trials and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence of meta-analysis results were used.

Results: 16 articles were included, of which, 7 studies were subjected to two meta-analyses to assess the relative risk of men becoming continent and the reduction of urine loss through pad. Participants who received treatment showed a 1.78 times greater risk of achieving continence compared to those who did not receive treatment (RR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.29‒2.45; I2 = 77%). The limitations of the present study are the lack of high-quality evidence, in which existing trials suffered from a lack of standardized outcome measures.

Conclusion: Electromyographic biofeedback in pelvic rehabilitation seems to contribute to the faster achievement of continence in prostatectomized men compared to those who did not undergo any intervention. Additionally, helps to reduce pad weight.

肌电图生物反馈对前列腺切除术后尿失禁患者盆底康复的影响:一项荟萃分析。
目的:探讨肌电图生物反馈对前列腺切除术后尿失禁患者盆底康复的影响。材料和方法:在数据库中进行检索:Pubmed/Medline、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献、物理治疗证据数据库、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和灰色文献。该研究包括随机临床试验,与其他资源或不治疗相比,使用肌电图生物反馈治疗前列腺切除术后尿失禁的男性盆腔康复。排除了使用括约肌植入物的失禁男性、药物治疗或数据不完整的研究。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所为随机临床试验开发的关键评估工具评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE方法评估荟萃分析结果证据的确定性。结果:纳入了16篇文章,其中7项研究纳入了两项荟萃分析,以评估男性尿失禁和尿垫减少尿量的相对风险。接受治疗的参与者出现尿失禁的风险是未接受治疗的参与者的1.78倍(RR = 1.78;95% ci 1.29-2.45;I2 = 77%)。本研究的局限性是缺乏高质量的证据,其中现有的试验缺乏标准化的结果测量。结论:与未接受任何干预的患者相比,盆腔康复中的肌电图生物反馈似乎有助于前列腺切除术患者更快地实现尿失禁。此外,有助于减轻垫的重量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics
Clinics 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
129
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: CLINICS is an electronic journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles in continuous flow, of interest to clinicians and researchers in the medical sciences. CLINICS complies with the policies of funding agencies which request or require deposition of the published articles that they fund into publicly available databases. CLINICS supports the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) on trial registration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信