Efficacy of combined herbal and Western medicine based on Traditional Chinese Medicine for mild cognitive impairment and dementia in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Eunbyul Cho, Hui Yan Zhao, Purumea Jun, Jung-Hee Jang
{"title":"Efficacy of combined herbal and Western medicine based on Traditional Chinese Medicine for mild cognitive impairment and dementia in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Eunbyul Cho, Hui Yan Zhao, Purumea Jun, Jung-Hee Jang","doi":"10.1159/000545937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical evidence supporting the combination of syndrome differentiation (SD)-based herbal medicine (HM) and Western medicine (WM) in treating Parkinson's disease (PD)-mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) and -dementia (PDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten electronic bibliographic databases were searched from inception to March 4, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SD-based HM plus conventional therapies with conventional therapies alone for PD-MCI and PDD. Two authors independently screened and selected studies and extracted data related to trial quality, characteristics, and results. The mean difference (MD) was used to analyze continuous variables, and meta-analysis was performed using Reviewer Manager 5.4 software. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 15 articles selected for review, 12 trials were included in the meta-analysis: 9 comprising 688 patients with PD-MCI and 3 comprising 264 patients with PDD and with a type of SD, such as \"blood stasis and stirring wind\" or \"deficiency of the liver-kidney.\" The meta-analysis showed significant differences favoring HM plus WM with respect to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score for PD-MCI (MD=2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI; 1.40, 3.19]; p<0.00001, I2=76%) and PDD (MD=3.14, 95% CI [0.48, 5.81]; p=0.02, I2=82%) compared with WM alone. Improvement of cognitive impairment treated using \"deficiency of the liver-kidney\" SD-based HM plus WM in PD-MCI was more beneficial than that treated using WM alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SD-based HM may serve as an adjunctive treatment for PD-MCI and PDD, improving cognitive function and alleviating PD symptoms. No severe adverse event was observed in the HM plus WM group, suggesting that HM may be safe for patients with cognitive impairment in PD. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of HM based on SD for PD-MCI and PDD is of poor quality, and all studies were conducted in China. Thus, and rigorous, multicenter, and international RCTs are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":10541,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Medicine Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical evidence supporting the combination of syndrome differentiation (SD)-based herbal medicine (HM) and Western medicine (WM) in treating Parkinson's disease (PD)-mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) and -dementia (PDD).

Methods: Ten electronic bibliographic databases were searched from inception to March 4, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SD-based HM plus conventional therapies with conventional therapies alone for PD-MCI and PDD. Two authors independently screened and selected studies and extracted data related to trial quality, characteristics, and results. The mean difference (MD) was used to analyze continuous variables, and meta-analysis was performed using Reviewer Manager 5.4 software. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

Results: For the 15 articles selected for review, 12 trials were included in the meta-analysis: 9 comprising 688 patients with PD-MCI and 3 comprising 264 patients with PDD and with a type of SD, such as "blood stasis and stirring wind" or "deficiency of the liver-kidney." The meta-analysis showed significant differences favoring HM plus WM with respect to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score for PD-MCI (MD=2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI; 1.40, 3.19]; p<0.00001, I2=76%) and PDD (MD=3.14, 95% CI [0.48, 5.81]; p=0.02, I2=82%) compared with WM alone. Improvement of cognitive impairment treated using "deficiency of the liver-kidney" SD-based HM plus WM in PD-MCI was more beneficial than that treated using WM alone.

Conclusions: SD-based HM may serve as an adjunctive treatment for PD-MCI and PDD, improving cognitive function and alleviating PD symptoms. No severe adverse event was observed in the HM plus WM group, suggesting that HM may be safe for patients with cognitive impairment in PD. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of HM based on SD for PD-MCI and PDD is of poor quality, and all studies were conducted in China. Thus, and rigorous, multicenter, and international RCTs are required.

以中医为基础的中西医结合治疗帕金森病轻度认知障碍和痴呆的疗效:系统综述和荟萃分析。
本系统综述旨在评估中医辨证结合西药治疗帕金森病(PD)-轻度认知障碍(PD- mci)-痴呆(PDD)的临床证据。方法:从成立到2024年3月4日,检索10个电子书目数据库,比较基于sd的HM联合常规治疗与单独常规治疗PD-MCI和PDD的随机对照试验(rct)。两位作者独立筛选和选择研究,并提取与试验质量、特征和结果相关的数据。连续变量采用均数差异(MD)分析,meta分析采用Reviewer Manager 5.4软件。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。结果:在入选的15篇文章中,12项试验被纳入荟萃分析:9项包括688名PD-MCI患者,3项包括264名PDD患者和一种SD类型,如“血瘀浑风”或“肝肾虚”。meta分析显示HM + WM在PD-MCI蒙特利尔认知评估评分方面有显著差异(MD=2.30, 95%可信区间[CI;1.40、3.19);结论:基于sd的HM可作为PD- mci和PDD的辅助治疗,改善认知功能,缓解PD症状。HM + WM组未观察到严重不良事件,提示HM对PD认知障碍患者可能是安全的。然而,关于基于SD的HM对PD-MCI和PDD的疗效的证据质量较差,并且所有研究都在中国进行。因此,需要严格的、多中心的、国际化的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary Medicine Research
Complementary Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope ''Complementary Medicine Research'' is an international journal that aims to bridge the gap between conventional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) on a sound scientific basis, promoting their mutual integration. Accordingly, experts of both conventional medicine and CAM medicine cooperate on the journal‘s editorial board, which accepts papers only after a rigorous peer-review process in order to maintain a high standard of scientific quality. Spectrum of ''Complementary Medicine Research'': - Review and Original Articles, Case Reports and Essays regarding complementary practice and methods - Journal Club: Analysis and discussion of internationally published articles in complementary medicine - Editorials of leading experts in complementary medicine - Questions of complementary patient-centered care - Education in complementary medicine - Reports on important meetings and conferences - Society Bulletins of Schweizerische Medizinische Gesellschaft für Phytotherapie (SMGP) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Naturheilkunde Bibliographic Details Complementary Medicine Research Journal Abbreviation: Complement Med Res ISSN: 2504-2092 (Print) e-ISSN: 2504-2106 (Online) DOI: 10.1159/issn.2504-2092 www.karger.com/CMR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信