Myosteatosis and the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yongjuan Wu, Guangyuan Cheng, Jun Han, Qingsong Yang
{"title":"Myosteatosis and the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Yongjuan Wu, Guangyuan Cheng, Jun Han, Qingsong Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10238-025-01671-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myosteatosis, characterized by fat infiltration into skeletal muscle, is increasingly recognized as a prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although the results were not consistent. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize impact on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HCC.A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted to identify observational studies reporting survival outcomes in HCC patients with and without myosteatosis. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. A total of 24 retrospective cohort studies involving 7436 HCC patients were included. Myosteatosis was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.40-1.83, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 65%) and PFS (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.33-1.76, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 36%). Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association in Asian studies (HR: 1.74 for OS; 1.57 for PFS) compared to European studies (HR: 1.08 for OS; 1.05 for PFS). The prognostic impact remained significant regardless of anticancer treatment type, myosteatosis assessment method, sex-specific or universal cutoff values, and follow-up duration (p for subgroup differences all > 0.05). The results remained significant in studies adjusting for sarcopenia (HR: 1.89 for OS; 1.50 for PFS). Meta-regression analyses did not suggest any of the following variables may affect the results, including sample size, mean ages of the patients, proportions of men, follow-up durations, and study quality scores (p all > 0.05).Myosteatosis is independently associated with worse survival in HCC patients, particularly in Asian populations. These findings highlight the significance of assessing muscle quality as a prognostic factor in HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01671-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Myosteatosis, characterized by fat infiltration into skeletal muscle, is increasingly recognized as a prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although the results were not consistent. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize impact on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HCC.A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted to identify observational studies reporting survival outcomes in HCC patients with and without myosteatosis. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. A total of 24 retrospective cohort studies involving 7436 HCC patients were included. Myosteatosis was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.40-1.83, p < 0.001, I2 = 65%) and PFS (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.33-1.76, p < 0.001, I2 = 36%). Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association in Asian studies (HR: 1.74 for OS; 1.57 for PFS) compared to European studies (HR: 1.08 for OS; 1.05 for PFS). The prognostic impact remained significant regardless of anticancer treatment type, myosteatosis assessment method, sex-specific or universal cutoff values, and follow-up duration (p for subgroup differences all > 0.05). The results remained significant in studies adjusting for sarcopenia (HR: 1.89 for OS; 1.50 for PFS). Meta-regression analyses did not suggest any of the following variables may affect the results, including sample size, mean ages of the patients, proportions of men, follow-up durations, and study quality scores (p all > 0.05).Myosteatosis is independently associated with worse survival in HCC patients, particularly in Asian populations. These findings highlight the significance of assessing muscle quality as a prognostic factor in HCC.

肌骨化病与肝细胞癌患者的生存:一项荟萃分析。
以脂肪浸润骨骼肌为特征的肌骨化病越来越被认为是肝细胞癌(HCC)的预后因素,尽管结果并不一致。本荟萃分析旨在总结对HCC患者总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的影响。对PubMed、Embase和Web of Science进行了系统搜索,以确定有或无肌骨增生的HCC患者的生存结果的观察性研究。采用随机效应模型计算合并风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。共纳入24项回顾性队列研究,涉及7436例HCC患者。肌骨化病与较差的OS (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.40-1.83, p 2 = 65%)和PFS (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.33-1.76, p 2 = 36%)显著相关。亚组分析显示,亚洲研究的相关性更强(OS的HR: 1.74;与欧洲研究相比,PFS的HR为1.57 (OS的HR为1.08;PFS为1.05)。无论抗癌治疗类型、肌骨化病评估方法、性别特异性或普遍临界值以及随访时间如何,预后影响仍然显著(亚组差异p均为0.05)。在校正肌肉减少症的研究中,结果仍然显著(OS的HR: 1.89;1.50 PFS)。meta回归分析未提示以下任何变量可能影响结果,包括样本量、患者平均年龄、男性比例、随访时间和研究质量评分(p均为0.05)。在HCC患者中,特别是在亚洲人群中,肌骨增生与较差的生存率独立相关。这些发现强调了评估肌肉质量作为HCC预后因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Clinical and Experimental Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信