Development and validation of an early prediction model for cardiac death risk in patients with light chain amyloidosis: a multicenter study.

IF 3.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Naidong Pang, Ying Tian, Hongjie Chi, Xiaohong Fu, Xin Li, Shuyu Wang, Feifei Pan, Dongying Wang, Lin Xu, Jingyi Luo, Aijun Liu, XingPeng Liu
{"title":"Development and validation of an early prediction model for cardiac death risk in patients with light chain amyloidosis: a multicenter study.","authors":"Naidong Pang, Ying Tian, Hongjie Chi, Xiaohong Fu, Xin Li, Shuyu Wang, Feifei Pan, Dongying Wang, Lin Xu, Jingyi Luo, Aijun Liu, XingPeng Liu","doi":"10.1186/s40959-025-00342-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac involvement is the primary driver of death in systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis. However, the early prediction of cardiac death risk in AL amyloidosis remains insufficient.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop a novel prediction model and prognostic scoring system that enables early identification of these high-risk individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 235 patients with confirmed AL cardiac amyloidosis from three hospitals. Patients from the first hospital were randomly assigned to the training and internal validation sets in an 8:2 ratio, while the external validation set comprised patients from the other two hospitals. Participants were categorized into a cardiac death group and a non-cardiac death group (including survivors and those who died from other causes). Five different machine learning models were used to train model, and model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All five models showed excellent performance on the training and internal validation sets. In external validation, both the Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest models achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.873 and 0.877, respectively, and exhibited superior calibration and decision curve analysis. Considering the comprehensive performance and clinical applicability, the LR model was selected as the final prediction model. The visualization results are ultimately presented in a nomogram. Further analyses were performed on the newly identified predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prediction model enables early identification and risk assessment of cardiac death in patients with AL amyloidosis, exhibiting considerable predictive ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9804,"journal":{"name":"Cardio-oncology","volume":"11 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardio-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-025-00342-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac involvement is the primary driver of death in systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis. However, the early prediction of cardiac death risk in AL amyloidosis remains insufficient.

Objectives: We aimed to develop a novel prediction model and prognostic scoring system that enables early identification of these high-risk individuals.

Methods: This study enrolled 235 patients with confirmed AL cardiac amyloidosis from three hospitals. Patients from the first hospital were randomly assigned to the training and internal validation sets in an 8:2 ratio, while the external validation set comprised patients from the other two hospitals. Participants were categorized into a cardiac death group and a non-cardiac death group (including survivors and those who died from other causes). Five different machine learning models were used to train model, and model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.

Results: All five models showed excellent performance on the training and internal validation sets. In external validation, both the Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest models achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.873 and 0.877, respectively, and exhibited superior calibration and decision curve analysis. Considering the comprehensive performance and clinical applicability, the LR model was selected as the final prediction model. The visualization results are ultimately presented in a nomogram. Further analyses were performed on the newly identified predictors.

Conclusions: This prediction model enables early identification and risk assessment of cardiac death in patients with AL amyloidosis, exhibiting considerable predictive ability.

轻链淀粉样变性患者心脏死亡风险早期预测模型的建立和验证:一项多中心研究
背景:心脏受累是全身性轻链(AL)淀粉样变性死亡的主要驱动因素。然而,AL淀粉样变性患者心脏死亡风险的早期预测仍然不足。目的:我们旨在开发一种新的预测模型和预后评分系统,以便早期识别这些高危人群。方法:本研究纳入了来自三家医院的235例确诊的AL心脏淀粉样变患者。第一家医院的患者以8:2的比例随机分配到训练集和内部验证集,而外部验证集由其他两家医院的患者组成。参与者被分为心脏死亡组和非心脏死亡组(包括幸存者和死于其他原因的人)。使用5种不同的机器学习模型对模型进行训练,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线分析对模型性能进行评估。结果:5个模型在训练集和内部验证集上均表现优异。在外部验证中,Logistic Regression (LR)和Random Forest模型的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.873和0.877,具有较好的校准和决策曲线分析能力。考虑综合性能和临床适用性,最终选择LR模型作为预测模型。可视化结果最终以图的形式呈现。对新发现的预测因子进行进一步分析。结论:该预测模型能够对AL淀粉样变性患者的心源性死亡进行早期识别和风险评估,具有相当的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardio-oncology
Cardio-oncology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信