Improved efficacy of concurrent anti-PD1 antibody plus AVD versus ABVD in patients with newly diagnosed early unfavorable and advanced stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective matched cohort study.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Mengqiu Wu, Peng Sun, Baitian Zhao, Hang Yang, Yi Xia, Man Nie, Qingqing Cai, Huiqiang Huang, He Huang, Zhongjun Xia, Yu Wang, Zhiming Li, Panpan Liu
{"title":"Improved efficacy of concurrent anti-PD1 antibody plus AVD versus ABVD in patients with newly diagnosed early unfavorable and advanced stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective matched cohort study.","authors":"Mengqiu Wu, Peng Sun, Baitian Zhao, Hang Yang, Yi Xia, Man Nie, Qingqing Cai, Huiqiang Huang, He Huang, Zhongjun Xia, Yu Wang, Zhiming Li, Panpan Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00262-025-04041-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis of early unfavorable and advanced stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) remains suboptimal with the widely used ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) regimen. Novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and anti-PD-1 antibody have demonstrated high efficacy and good tolerance in relapsed/refractory cHL and have also shown promising results in the frontline setting. However, concurrent administration of anti-PD-1 antibody plus AVD in comparison with traditional ABVD regimen alone in untreated classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has yet to be adequately studied in real-world clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled eligible adult patients with histologically confirmed cHL who had received initial treatment with the ABVD regimen, or the novel combination regimens of anti-PD1-AVD. The study endpoints included modified progression-free survival (mPFS) and complete response (CR) after 2 cycles of therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance clinical variables between regimens prior to efficacy comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 172 patients, 137 received the ABVD regimen and 35 received the anti-PD1-AVD regimen. With a median follow-up of 37.7 months, significantly prolonged 3-year modified PFS was reported for anti-PD1-AVD versus ABVD (PSM: 91.0 vs. 61.6%, p = 0.032). Significantly improved CR rate was observed with anti-PD1-AVD versus ABVD (PSM: 86.7 vs. 63.8%, p = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world study, concurrent anti-PD1 antibody with AVD showed significantly prolonged modified PFS and improved CR rate after cycle 2 versus ABVD regimen, supporting the use of novel agents in frontline therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9595,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","volume":"74 7","pages":"206"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-025-04041-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prognosis of early unfavorable and advanced stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) remains suboptimal with the widely used ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) regimen. Novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and anti-PD-1 antibody have demonstrated high efficacy and good tolerance in relapsed/refractory cHL and have also shown promising results in the frontline setting. However, concurrent administration of anti-PD-1 antibody plus AVD in comparison with traditional ABVD regimen alone in untreated classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has yet to be adequately studied in real-world clinical practice.

Methods: We enrolled eligible adult patients with histologically confirmed cHL who had received initial treatment with the ABVD regimen, or the novel combination regimens of anti-PD1-AVD. The study endpoints included modified progression-free survival (mPFS) and complete response (CR) after 2 cycles of therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance clinical variables between regimens prior to efficacy comparisons.

Results: Of 172 patients, 137 received the ABVD regimen and 35 received the anti-PD1-AVD regimen. With a median follow-up of 37.7 months, significantly prolonged 3-year modified PFS was reported for anti-PD1-AVD versus ABVD (PSM: 91.0 vs. 61.6%, p = 0.032). Significantly improved CR rate was observed with anti-PD1-AVD versus ABVD (PSM: 86.7 vs. 63.8%, p = 0.049).

Conclusions: In this real-world study, concurrent anti-PD1 antibody with AVD showed significantly prolonged modified PFS and improved CR rate after cycle 2 versus ABVD regimen, supporting the use of novel agents in frontline therapy.

在新诊断的早期和晚期经典霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中,并发抗pd1抗体+ AVD与ABVD的疗效提高:一项回顾性匹配队列研究
背景:广泛使用ABVD(阿霉素、博来霉素、长春碱和达卡巴嗪)方案,早期不良和晚期经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)的预后仍不理想。新型药物,如brentuximab vedotin (BV)和抗pd -1抗体,在复发/难治性cHL中显示出高效率和良好的耐受性,并且在一线环境中也显示出令人鼓舞的结果。然而,在未经治疗的经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)中,抗pd -1抗体联合AVD与传统ABVD方案同时使用的比较尚未在现实世界的临床实践中得到充分的研究。方法:我们招募了符合条件的成年cHL患者,他们接受了ABVD方案的初始治疗,或抗pd1 - avd的新型联合方案。研究终点包括2个周期治疗后的改良无进展生存期(mPFS)和完全缓解(CR)。在进行疗效比较之前,采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡方案之间的临床变量。结果:172例患者中,137例接受ABVD方案,35例接受抗pd1 - avd方案。中位随访37.7个月,抗pd1 - avd与ABVD的3年改良PFS显著延长(PSM: 91.0 vs. 61.6%, p = 0.032)。与ABVD相比,抗pd1 - avd组的CR率显著提高(PSM: 86.7比63.8%,p = 0.049)。结论:在这项现实世界的研究中,与ABVD方案相比,AVD并发抗pd1抗体在第2周期后显着延长了改良PFS和提高了CR率,支持在一线治疗中使用新型药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
207
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy has the basic aim of keeping readers informed of the latest research results in the fields of oncology and immunology. As knowledge expands, the scope of the journal has broadened to include more of the progress being made in the areas of biology concerned with biological response modifiers. This helps keep readers up to date on the latest advances in our understanding of tumor-host interactions. The journal publishes short editorials including "position papers," general reviews, original articles, and short communications, providing a forum for the most current experimental and clinical advances in tumor immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信