Evaluating Efficacy of Cervical HPV-HR DNA Testing as Alternative to PET/CT Imaging for Post-Treatment Cancer Surveillance: Retrospective Proof of Concept Study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cameron Huddleston, Chinnadurai Mani, Naresh Sah, Emerald Courtney, Kimberly Reese, Stephanie Stroever, Komaraiah Palle, Mark B Reedy
{"title":"Evaluating Efficacy of Cervical HPV-HR DNA Testing as Alternative to PET/CT Imaging for Post-Treatment Cancer Surveillance: Retrospective Proof of Concept Study.","authors":"Cameron Huddleston, Chinnadurai Mani, Naresh Sah, Emerald Courtney, Kimberly Reese, Stephanie Stroever, Komaraiah Palle, Mark B Reedy","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-risk-human papillomaviruses (HPV-HR) are implicated in over 99% of cervical/vaginal malignancies. Despite this strong association, current guidelines recommend Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) imaging over HPV-HR DNA testing as the standard prognostic tool following definitive therapy. This retrospective, single-institution, proof-of-concept study evaluated HPV-HR DNA testing as a potential alternative to PET/CT imaging for post-treatment surveillance in cervical and vaginal cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Female patients with cervical or vaginal cancer treated between 2010 and 2023 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients had complete documentation of pre- and post-treatment PET/CT imaging and HPV-HR DNA testing. Of over 100 patients identified, only 53 met the inclusion criteria and both radical hysterectomy and chemoradiation patients were included. Statistical analyses, including sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values, were conducted using STATA, with significance set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-treatment HPV-HR DNA testing demonstrated a superior sensitivity (92.31%) and negative predictive value (97.44% NPV) compared to PET/CT imaging (76.92% sensitivity, 92.31% NPV). While PET/CT imaging maintained higher specificity over HPV-HR DNA testing (100% vs. 95%) and positive predictive value (100% vs. 85.71%), HPV-HR DNA testing offers a more sensitive and cost-effective method for identifying patients requiring further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HPV-HR DNA testing is a promising, cost-effective surveillance tool with higher sensitivity and NPV than PET/CT. Its clinical use may reduce PET/CT need, improve safety, and lower costs, requiring further validation.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>HPV-HR DNA testing offers a cost-effective alternative to PET/CT, reducing costs, unnecessary imaging, and improving accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1828","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-risk-human papillomaviruses (HPV-HR) are implicated in over 99% of cervical/vaginal malignancies. Despite this strong association, current guidelines recommend Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) imaging over HPV-HR DNA testing as the standard prognostic tool following definitive therapy. This retrospective, single-institution, proof-of-concept study evaluated HPV-HR DNA testing as a potential alternative to PET/CT imaging for post-treatment surveillance in cervical and vaginal cancers.

Methods: Female patients with cervical or vaginal cancer treated between 2010 and 2023 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients had complete documentation of pre- and post-treatment PET/CT imaging and HPV-HR DNA testing. Of over 100 patients identified, only 53 met the inclusion criteria and both radical hysterectomy and chemoradiation patients were included. Statistical analyses, including sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values, were conducted using STATA, with significance set at 0.05.

Results: Post-treatment HPV-HR DNA testing demonstrated a superior sensitivity (92.31%) and negative predictive value (97.44% NPV) compared to PET/CT imaging (76.92% sensitivity, 92.31% NPV). While PET/CT imaging maintained higher specificity over HPV-HR DNA testing (100% vs. 95%) and positive predictive value (100% vs. 85.71%), HPV-HR DNA testing offers a more sensitive and cost-effective method for identifying patients requiring further evaluation.

Conclusions: HPV-HR DNA testing is a promising, cost-effective surveillance tool with higher sensitivity and NPV than PET/CT. Its clinical use may reduce PET/CT need, improve safety, and lower costs, requiring further validation.

Impact: HPV-HR DNA testing offers a cost-effective alternative to PET/CT, reducing costs, unnecessary imaging, and improving accessibility.

评估宫颈癌HPV-HR DNA检测作为治疗后癌症监测替代PET/CT成像的疗效:回顾性概念验证研究
背景:高风险人乳头瘤病毒(HPV-HR)与99%以上的宫颈/阴道恶性肿瘤有关。尽管存在这种强烈的关联,目前的指南推荐正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)成像代替HPV-HR DNA检测作为确定治疗后的标准预后工具。这项回顾性、单机构、概念验证性研究评估了HPV-HR DNA检测作为宫颈癌和阴道癌治疗后监测的潜在替代PET/CT成像。方法:回顾性分析我院2010 ~ 2023年收治的女性宫颈癌或阴道癌患者。符合条件的患者有完整的治疗前后PET/CT成像和HPV-HR DNA检测记录。在100多例患者中,只有53例符合纳入标准,包括根治性子宫切除术和放化疗患者。采用STATA进行统计学分析,包括敏感性、特异性和预测值,显著性设置为0.05。结果:治疗后HPV-HR DNA检测的敏感性(92.31%)优于PET/CT成像(76.92%,92.31% NPV),阴性预测值(97.44% NPV)。虽然PET/CT成像比HPV-HR DNA检测保持更高的特异性(100%对95%)和阳性预测值(100%对85.71%),HPV-HR DNA检测为识别需要进一步评估的患者提供了更敏感和更具成本效益的方法。结论:与PET/CT相比,HPV-HR DNA检测具有更高的灵敏度和NPV,是一种有前景的、具有成本效益的监测工具。其临床应用可能会减少PET/CT需求,提高安全性,降低成本,但需要进一步验证。影响:HPV-HR DNA检测为PET/CT提供了一种具有成本效益的替代方法,降低了成本,减少了不必要的成像,提高了可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信