Kaiming Wang, Tali Sharir, M Timothy Hauser, Sharmila Dorbala, Marcelo Di Carli, Mathews B Fish, Terrence D Ruddy, Timothy Bateman, Andrew J Einstein, Philipp A Kaufmann, Edward J Miller, Albert J Sinusas, Wanda Acampa, Julian Halcox, Monica Martins, Joanna X Liang, Valerie Builoff, Damini Dey, Daniel S Berman, Robert J H Miller, Piotr J Slomka
{"title":"Reassessing Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.","authors":"Kaiming Wang, Tali Sharir, M Timothy Hauser, Sharmila Dorbala, Marcelo Di Carli, Mathews B Fish, Terrence D Ruddy, Timothy Bateman, Andrew J Einstein, Philipp A Kaufmann, Edward J Miller, Albert J Sinusas, Wanda Acampa, Julian Halcox, Monica Martins, Joanna X Liang, Valerie Builoff, Damini Dey, Daniel S Berman, Robert J H Miller, Piotr J Slomka","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are often regarded as analogous risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), given their shared pathophysiology. We aimed to investigate whether the elevated MACE risk in PAD is driven by myocardial perfusion abnormalities or through other PAD-specific mediators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 45,252 patients from an international, multicentre registry who underwent SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, excluding those with early coronary revascularization (< 90 days). Myocardial perfusion abnormalities were quantified using total perfusion deficit (TPD). MACE was defined as all-cause mortality, unstable angina admission, myocardial infarction, or late coronary revascularization. PAD was defined using questionnaires or review of electronic medical records. Propensity-score matching was used to select balanced groups of patients with and without PAD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 3.6 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.6-4.8 years), 5932 patients (13.7%) experienced at least 1 MACE. Compared with patients with neither disease, isolated history of CAD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-2.05) conferred a similar MACE risk as concomitant history of CAD and PAD (aHR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.44-1.71) and greater risk than isolated history of PAD (aHR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09-1.32; P < 0.001). After propensity-score matching, history of PAD alone was not independently associated with increased MACE risk (P = 0.064).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although patients with PAD often have concomitant CAD and greater myocardial perfusion abnormalities, PAD itself was not linked to higher risk of MACE after adjusting for these factors. These findings highlight the importance of assessing myocardial ischemic burden in PAD for risk stratification and prompt initiation of disease-modifying therapies.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>▪▪▪.</p>","PeriodicalId":9555,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2025.05.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are often regarded as analogous risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), given their shared pathophysiology. We aimed to investigate whether the elevated MACE risk in PAD is driven by myocardial perfusion abnormalities or through other PAD-specific mediators.
Methods: We analyzed 45,252 patients from an international, multicentre registry who underwent SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, excluding those with early coronary revascularization (< 90 days). Myocardial perfusion abnormalities were quantified using total perfusion deficit (TPD). MACE was defined as all-cause mortality, unstable angina admission, myocardial infarction, or late coronary revascularization. PAD was defined using questionnaires or review of electronic medical records. Propensity-score matching was used to select balanced groups of patients with and without PAD.
Results: During a median follow-up of 3.6 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.6-4.8 years), 5932 patients (13.7%) experienced at least 1 MACE. Compared with patients with neither disease, isolated history of CAD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-2.05) conferred a similar MACE risk as concomitant history of CAD and PAD (aHR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.44-1.71) and greater risk than isolated history of PAD (aHR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09-1.32; P < 0.001). After propensity-score matching, history of PAD alone was not independently associated with increased MACE risk (P = 0.064).
Conclusions: Although patients with PAD often have concomitant CAD and greater myocardial perfusion abnormalities, PAD itself was not linked to higher risk of MACE after adjusting for these factors. These findings highlight the importance of assessing myocardial ischemic burden in PAD for risk stratification and prompt initiation of disease-modifying therapies.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Cardiology (CJC) is the official journal of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS). The CJC is a vehicle for the international dissemination of new knowledge in cardiology and cardiovascular science, particularly serving as the major venue for Canadian cardiovascular medicine.