Clinical evaluation of an in-house Xpert Lysate-based Method combined with MALDI-TOF MS for the rapid identification of positive blood cultures.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Yili Ping, Qiong Chen, Xiling Sun, Haiyan Wang, Shaohua Lin, Bingwei Zhu, Zhejiong Wang, Jun Lu, Junmin Cao
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of an in-house Xpert Lysate-based Method combined with MALDI-TOF MS for the rapid identification of positive blood cultures.","authors":"Yili Ping, Qiong Chen, Xiling Sun, Haiyan Wang, Shaohua Lin, Bingwei Zhu, Zhejiong Wang, Jun Lu, Junmin Cao","doi":"10.1186/s12866-025-03996-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical practice, bloodstream infections (BSIs) can lead to a very high mortality rate. Rapid identification (ID) of the pathogenic bacteria in positive blood cultures (PBCs) can guide the clinical implementation of effective antibiotic treatment in advance, thereby helping to reduce the mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Conventional Culture Method results as criteria, we evaluated the effectiveness of our newly developed in-house method, the Xpert Lysate-based Method, for rapidly identifying pathogens in PBCs across four hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 629 monomicrobial PBCs were investigated. The Xpert Lysate-based Method correctly identified 96.18% of PBCs at the species level and 97.30% at the genus level. When the confidence scores of MALDI-TOF MS were ≥ 2.000, ≥ 1.700, and ≥ 1.500, the percentages of correctly identified PBCs at the species level were 67.47%, 94.24%, and 98.88%, respectively. When the score threshold of species-level ID was set to 1.500, the rates reached 98.25% for Gram-positives (GPs), 93.54% for Gram-negatives (GNs), 70.00% for anaerobes, and 94.74% for fungi, respectively. The median confidence score of ≥ 2.000 indicated high certainty in identifying common BSI pathogens. Additionally, one of the microbial species was correctly identified in 10 out of 11 PBCs with polymicrobial growth. The entire operation process took an average of 10 min of hands-on time and 15 to 20 min for time-to-result.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The method of directly identifying microbial pellets using MALDI-TOF MS, extracted via the Xpert Lysate-based Method we developed, is non-inferior to the conventional Culture Method in terms of ID performance. Meanwhile, it is easy to operate and more time-efficient, making it suitable for routine workflow in the rapid etiological ID of PBCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"293"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03996-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In clinical practice, bloodstream infections (BSIs) can lead to a very high mortality rate. Rapid identification (ID) of the pathogenic bacteria in positive blood cultures (PBCs) can guide the clinical implementation of effective antibiotic treatment in advance, thereby helping to reduce the mortality rate.

Methods: Using the Conventional Culture Method results as criteria, we evaluated the effectiveness of our newly developed in-house method, the Xpert Lysate-based Method, for rapidly identifying pathogens in PBCs across four hospitals.

Results: A total of 629 monomicrobial PBCs were investigated. The Xpert Lysate-based Method correctly identified 96.18% of PBCs at the species level and 97.30% at the genus level. When the confidence scores of MALDI-TOF MS were ≥ 2.000, ≥ 1.700, and ≥ 1.500, the percentages of correctly identified PBCs at the species level were 67.47%, 94.24%, and 98.88%, respectively. When the score threshold of species-level ID was set to 1.500, the rates reached 98.25% for Gram-positives (GPs), 93.54% for Gram-negatives (GNs), 70.00% for anaerobes, and 94.74% for fungi, respectively. The median confidence score of ≥ 2.000 indicated high certainty in identifying common BSI pathogens. Additionally, one of the microbial species was correctly identified in 10 out of 11 PBCs with polymicrobial growth. The entire operation process took an average of 10 min of hands-on time and 15 to 20 min for time-to-result.

Conclusion: The method of directly identifying microbial pellets using MALDI-TOF MS, extracted via the Xpert Lysate-based Method we developed, is non-inferior to the conventional Culture Method in terms of ID performance. Meanwhile, it is easy to operate and more time-efficient, making it suitable for routine workflow in the rapid etiological ID of PBCs.

结合MALDI-TOF质谱快速鉴定阳性血培养的内部专家裂解液法的临床评价。
背景:在临床实践中,血流感染(bsi)可导致非常高的死亡率。对血培养阳性(PBCs)病原菌进行快速鉴定(ID),可以提前指导临床实施有效的抗生素治疗,从而有助于降低死亡率。方法:使用常规培养法结果作为标准,我们评估了我们新开发的内部方法的有效性,即基于Xpert裂解物的方法,用于快速识别四家医院的pbc中的病原体。结果:共检出629株单菌PBCs。基于Xpert裂解液的方法在种水平上正确鉴定出96.18%的pbc,在属水平上正确鉴定出97.30%的pbc。当MALDI-TOF MS的置信度评分≥2.000、≥1.700和≥1.500时,物种水平上PBCs的正确率分别为67.47%、94.24%和98.88%。当种级ID评分阈值设置为1.500时,革兰氏阳性菌(gp)、革兰氏阴性菌(GNs)、厌氧菌(70.00%)和真菌(94.74%)的检出率分别为98.25%、93.54%、70.00%。中位置信度得分≥2.000表明在识别常见BSI病原体方面具有很高的确定性。此外,在11个多微生物生长的PBCs中,有10个正确识别了其中一种微生物。整个操作过程平均需要10分钟的动手时间和15到20分钟的结果时间。结论:采用基于Xpert裂解酸盐的方法提取的MALDI-TOF质谱直接鉴定微生物微球的方法在ID性能上不低于常规培养方法。同时,该方法操作简便、省时,适用于PBCs快速病原学鉴定的常规工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信