Is adults' borderline personality disorder associated with their attachment experiences, rejection and mental security? A cross-sectional study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mojdeh Askari, Mohammad Ali Zakeri, Alaa Hamza Hermis, Xiao Xu, Sri Widowati, Reza Mohammadmehr
{"title":"Is adults' borderline personality disorder associated with their attachment experiences, rejection and mental security? A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Mojdeh Askari, Mohammad Ali Zakeri, Alaa Hamza Hermis, Xiao Xu, Sri Widowati, Reza Mohammadmehr","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06900-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is highly correlated with other mental disorders and poses significant psychological and social risks both to individuals and to society. This study aims to investigate the relationship between attachment, perceived rejection, and psychological security with BPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional correlational study was conducted on 89 BPD patients. The BPD patients was selected using a convenience sampling method. The instruments used in this study included the demographic characteristics form, the Rejection Sensitivity Perception Scale (RSPS), the Revised Adult Attachment Scale (RAAS), the Maslow's Psychological Security scale and the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22, employing Pearson correlation and regression analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean scores of BPI were 25.59 ± 5.19. The mean scores for perceived rejection and attachment were 7.71 ± 3.52 and 35.76 ± 6.64, respectively. We found a positive significant correlation between perceived rejection (r = 0.35, p = 0.001), attachment (r = 0.25, p = 0.017) and psychological and social security (r = 0.55, p < 0.001) with BPI. The results of multivariate linear regression indicated that psychological and social security, perceived rejection, and gender predicted 40% of the variance in BPD (R² = 40%) (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the present study, attachment, rejection, and sense of security were found to be associated with BPD. To prevent BPD, it is essential to consider factors such as attachment, rejection, and security. Therefore, mental health care providers are advised to plan and implement appropriate interventions to identify and improve these variables, thereby enhancing related health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"490"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06900-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is highly correlated with other mental disorders and poses significant psychological and social risks both to individuals and to society. This study aims to investigate the relationship between attachment, perceived rejection, and psychological security with BPD.

Methods: This cross-sectional correlational study was conducted on 89 BPD patients. The BPD patients was selected using a convenience sampling method. The instruments used in this study included the demographic characteristics form, the Rejection Sensitivity Perception Scale (RSPS), the Revised Adult Attachment Scale (RAAS), the Maslow's Psychological Security scale and the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22, employing Pearson correlation and regression analysis methods.

Results: The mean scores of BPI were 25.59 ± 5.19. The mean scores for perceived rejection and attachment were 7.71 ± 3.52 and 35.76 ± 6.64, respectively. We found a positive significant correlation between perceived rejection (r = 0.35, p = 0.001), attachment (r = 0.25, p = 0.017) and psychological and social security (r = 0.55, p < 0.001) with BPI. The results of multivariate linear regression indicated that psychological and social security, perceived rejection, and gender predicted 40% of the variance in BPD (R² = 40%) (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: In the present study, attachment, rejection, and sense of security were found to be associated with BPD. To prevent BPD, it is essential to consider factors such as attachment, rejection, and security. Therefore, mental health care providers are advised to plan and implement appropriate interventions to identify and improve these variables, thereby enhancing related health outcomes.

成年人的边缘型人格障碍是否与他们的依恋经历、拒绝和心理安全感有关?横断面研究。
背景:边缘型人格障碍(BPD)与其他精神障碍高度相关,对个体和社会都具有显著的心理和社会风险。本研究旨在探讨BPD患者依恋、感知排斥和心理安全感之间的关系。方法:对89例BPD患者进行横断面相关性研究。采用方便抽样的方法选取BPD患者。本研究使用的工具包括人口统计学特征表、拒绝敏感性知觉量表(RSPS)、修订成人依恋量表(RAAS)、马斯洛心理安全量表和边缘型人格量表(BPI)。数据分析采用SPSS version 22,采用Pearson相关和回归分析方法。结果:BPI平均评分为25.59±5.19分。感知排斥和依恋的平均得分分别为7.71±3.52和35.76±6.64。研究发现,被排斥感(r = 0.35, p = 0.001)、依恋感(r = 0.25, p = 0.017)、心理和社会安全感(r = 0.55, p)与BPD存在显著正相关。为了预防BPD,必须考虑依恋、拒绝和安全感等因素。因此,建议精神卫生保健提供者计划和实施适当的干预措施,以识别和改善这些变量,从而提高相关的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信