Clinical outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment using C-root SP combined with different obturation techniques in older patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Liping Dong, Jianshe Li, Peng Xue, Suixin Hu, Chen Xu, Lin Wang, Liu Liu, Qiang Luo, Huixia He, Fei Chen
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment using C-root SP combined with different obturation techniques in older patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Liping Dong, Jianshe Li, Peng Xue, Suixin Hu, Chen Xu, Lin Wang, Liu Liu, Qiang Luo, Huixia He, Fei Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06117-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy and outcomes of C-Root SP bioceramic-based sealers combined with different obturation techniques in nonsurgical root canal treatment for older patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-center, single-blind, parallel, randomized clinical trial included 240 patients aged ≥ 60 years. Patients were randomly divided into four treatment groups. Group A: C-Root SP combined with single-cone (SC); Group B: C-Root SP combined with warm vertical compaction (WVC); Group C: C-Root SP combined with cold lateral condensation (CLC); Group D: iRoot SP combined with SC (Control). All teeth were subjected to root canal filling using the corresponding methods 7-10 days after root canal preparation and medication. The duration of obturation was recorded. Periapical radiographs were obtained immediately after obturation to determine the length of root canal filling, and postoperative pain on days 1, 2, and 7 was documented. The treatment outcomes based on clinical signs and symptoms as well as periapical index (PAI) were analyzed at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups A and D exhibited significantly higher filling efficiency than groups B and C (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the length of obturation between the groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative pain decreased over time in all groups, with group A showing significantly lower pain rates on day 1 than the other groups (P < 0.05). After 1 year, all groups exhibited considerable reductions in the PAI scores, with success rates ranging from 91.23 to 94.83%; however, no significant differences were observed between them (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>C-Root SP combined with different obturation techniques yielded similar outcomes to iRoot SP combined with the SC technique in terms of filling length, success rate, and changes in PAI scores. The SC technique demonstrated significant advantages in terms of clinical efficiency and may reduce early postoperative pain when combined with C-Root SP.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was retrospectively registered in chictr.org.cn with the identifier: ChiCTR2400092580 on 11/19/2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06117-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and outcomes of C-Root SP bioceramic-based sealers combined with different obturation techniques in nonsurgical root canal treatment for older patients.

Methods: This prospective, single-center, single-blind, parallel, randomized clinical trial included 240 patients aged ≥ 60 years. Patients were randomly divided into four treatment groups. Group A: C-Root SP combined with single-cone (SC); Group B: C-Root SP combined with warm vertical compaction (WVC); Group C: C-Root SP combined with cold lateral condensation (CLC); Group D: iRoot SP combined with SC (Control). All teeth were subjected to root canal filling using the corresponding methods 7-10 days after root canal preparation and medication. The duration of obturation was recorded. Periapical radiographs were obtained immediately after obturation to determine the length of root canal filling, and postoperative pain on days 1, 2, and 7 was documented. The treatment outcomes based on clinical signs and symptoms as well as periapical index (PAI) were analyzed at 1 year postoperatively.

Results: Groups A and D exhibited significantly higher filling efficiency than groups B and C (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the length of obturation between the groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative pain decreased over time in all groups, with group A showing significantly lower pain rates on day 1 than the other groups (P < 0.05). After 1 year, all groups exhibited considerable reductions in the PAI scores, with success rates ranging from 91.23 to 94.83%; however, no significant differences were observed between them (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: C-Root SP combined with different obturation techniques yielded similar outcomes to iRoot SP combined with the SC technique in terms of filling length, success rate, and changes in PAI scores. The SC technique demonstrated significant advantages in terms of clinical efficiency and may reduce early postoperative pain when combined with C-Root SP.

Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered in chictr.org.cn with the identifier: ChiCTR2400092580 on 11/19/2024.

c -根SP联合不同封闭技术治疗老年患者非手术根管的临床效果:一项随机对照临床试验
背景:评价C-Root SP生物陶瓷封口器联合不同封闭技术在老年患者非手术根管治疗中的临床疗效和结果。方法:该前瞻性、单中心、单盲、平行、随机临床试验纳入240例年龄≥60岁的患者。患者随机分为4个治疗组。A组:C-Root SP联合单锥(SC);B组:c根SP加温垂直压实(WVC);C组:C- root SP合并冷侧冷凝(CLC);D组:iRoot SP联合SC(对照组)。所有牙在根管准备及用药后7-10天采用相应的方法进行根管充填。记录闭孔持续时间。在封闭后立即进行根尖周x线片以确定根管填充的长度,并记录术后第1、2和7天的疼痛。分析术后1年临床体征、症状及根尖周指数(PAI)的治疗效果。结果:A、D组灌胃效率显著高于B、C组(P < 0.05)。各组术后疼痛随时间的推移而减轻,其中A组第1天疼痛率明显低于其他组(P < 0.05)。结论:C-Root SP联合不同的充填技术与iRoot SP联合SC技术在充填长度、成功率和PAI评分变化方面的结果相似。SC技术在临床效率方面具有显著优势,并且与C-Root sp联合使用可减少术后早期疼痛。试验注册:该研究于2024年11月19日在chictr.org.cn上回顾性注册,标识符为ChiCTR2400092580。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信