A study on the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of oral tablet formulations of riluzole among healthy volunteers utilizing HPLC-MS/MS.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Fei Yu, Rui Wang, Keli Wang, BoYang Lin, Xuan Zhou, Linghong Chen, Li Ma, Zheng Liao, Wanggang Zhang
{"title":"A study on the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of oral tablet formulations of riluzole among healthy volunteers utilizing HPLC-MS/MS.","authors":"Fei Yu, Rui Wang, Keli Wang, BoYang Lin, Xuan Zhou, Linghong Chen, Li Ma, Zheng Liao, Wanggang Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s40360-025-00931-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This randomized, open-label, two period, two treatment, fasting bioequivalence trial was conducted to demonstrate the bioequivalence between riluzole tablets manufactured by Jiangsu Enhua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and the reference preparations from Sanofi Winthrop Industry (certified by Sanofi Mature IP) in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters and evaluate the bioequivalence of both preparations when taken on an empty stomach. Additionally, the safety profile of both preparations was assessed in the study population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two subjects participated in the trial and received riluzole tablets once per dosing cycle while fasting. They were randomLy assigned to either a 50-mg test or reference formulation, with a 7-day washout period between cycles. Venous blood samples (4 mL) were collected 22 times from each subject, starting before dosing (0 h) and ending 48 h after. Plasma riluzole concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. This clinical trial has been officially registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (accessible at http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.htmL ) with the registration number CTR20230637 on March 02, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the geometric mean ratios of key pharmacokinetic parameters-including the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last nonzero concentration (AUC<sub>0 - t</sub>) (102.21%; confidence interval [CI], 96.85-107.86%), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>) (102.03%; CI, 96.86-107.47%), and the peak plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) (107.47%; CI, 95.03-121.54%)-all fell within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80-125%. Importantly, no serious adverse events were reported, and no subjects withdrew due to adverse events, indicating good tolerability of both formulations among the healthy Chinese volunteers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings establish the bioequivalence of the 50-mg test preparation of oral riluzole tablets with the reference listed drug.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"26 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-025-00931-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This randomized, open-label, two period, two treatment, fasting bioequivalence trial was conducted to demonstrate the bioequivalence between riluzole tablets manufactured by Jiangsu Enhua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and the reference preparations from Sanofi Winthrop Industry (certified by Sanofi Mature IP) in healthy individuals.

Objective: The study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters and evaluate the bioequivalence of both preparations when taken on an empty stomach. Additionally, the safety profile of both preparations was assessed in the study population.

Methods: Seventy-two subjects participated in the trial and received riluzole tablets once per dosing cycle while fasting. They were randomLy assigned to either a 50-mg test or reference formulation, with a 7-day washout period between cycles. Venous blood samples (4 mL) were collected 22 times from each subject, starting before dosing (0 h) and ending 48 h after. Plasma riluzole concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. This clinical trial has been officially registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (accessible at http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.htmL ) with the registration number CTR20230637 on March 02, 2023.

Results: The results showed that the geometric mean ratios of key pharmacokinetic parameters-including the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last nonzero concentration (AUC0 - t) (102.21%; confidence interval [CI], 96.85-107.86%), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) (102.03%; CI, 96.86-107.47%), and the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) (107.47%; CI, 95.03-121.54%)-all fell within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80-125%. Importantly, no serious adverse events were reported, and no subjects withdrew due to adverse events, indicating good tolerability of both formulations among the healthy Chinese volunteers.

Conclusion: These findings establish the bioequivalence of the 50-mg test preparation of oral riluzole tablets with the reference listed drug.

利用高效液相色谱-质谱联用技术研究利鲁唑口服片剂在健康志愿者体内的药动学生物等效性。
前言:本试验采用随机、开放标签、两期、两疗程、空腹生物等效性试验,验证江苏恩华制药有限公司生产的利鲁唑片与赛诺菲温思罗普工业公司(赛诺菲成熟知识产权认证)的对照制剂在健康个体中的生物等效性。目的:比较两种制剂空腹服用时的药动学参数和生物等效性。此外,在研究人群中评估了这两种制剂的安全性。方法:72名受试者在禁食的同时,每给药一个周期服用一次利鲁唑片。他们被随机分配到50毫克的试验制剂或参考制剂,两个周期之间有7天的洗脱期。从给药前(0 h)开始至给药后48 h结束,每人采集静脉血22次(4 mL)。采用液相色谱串联质谱法测定血浆利鲁唑浓度。本临床试验已于2023年3月2日在中国临床试验注册中心(网址:http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.htmL)正式注册,注册号:CTR20230637。结果:各药代动力学关键参数血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0 -t)的几何平均比值为102.21%;置信区间[CI], 96.85-107.86%),从时间0到∞的AUC (AUC0-∞)(102.03%;CI为96.86 ~ 107.47%),血药峰浓度(Cmax)为107.47%;CI 95.03-121.54%),均在80-125%的生物等效性接受范围内。重要的是,没有严重的不良事件报告,也没有受试者因不良事件退出,表明两种制剂在健康的中国志愿者中具有良好的耐受性。结论:利鲁唑口服片50mg制剂与参比药具有生物等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACYTOXICOLOGY&nb-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信