Prognostic value of glycemic gap in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-associated acute kidney injury.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Xiaofu Zhang, Yong Li, Qinghuan Yang, Siwen Wu, Yang Song, Ziyun Luo, Jianping Xu
{"title":"Prognostic value of glycemic gap in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-associated acute kidney injury.","authors":"Xiaofu Zhang, Yong Li, Qinghuan Yang, Siwen Wu, Yang Song, Ziyun Luo, Jianping Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12882-025-04167-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress-induced hyperglycemia (SIH) is a common phenomenon in acute myocardial infarction and is associated with poor prognosis. The relationship between glycemic gap (GG), a marker of SIH, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-associated acute kidney injury (STAAKI) remains unclear. This study aims to explore the predictive value of GG for the risk of STAAKI after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively selected patients diagnosed with STEMI who underwent primary PCI. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with STAAKI. To examine the dose-response relationship between GG and STAAKI, restricted cubic splines (RCS) were employed. The predictive accuracy of the models was assessed using Delong test, net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 595 patients, the incidence of STAAKI was 9.2%. Multivariate logistic regression showed LVEF (OR per 1% increase = 0.931, 95% CI: 0.895 ~ 0.969), NT-proBNP (OR per 1 pg/mL increase = 1.579, 95% CI: 1.212 ~ 2.057), and GG (OR per 1 mmol/L increase = 1.379, 95% CI: 1.223 ~ 1.554) as independent predictors of STAAKI. RCS analysis indicated a linear dose-response relationship between GG and STAAKI. After integrating GG, the new model could significantly improve the risk model for STAAKI (Z = 2.77, NRI = 0.780, and IDI = 0.095; All P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GG is an independent risk factor for the occurrence of STAAKI after PCI in STEMI patients, and integrating GG can significantly improve risk modeling regarding STAAKI.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04167-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stress-induced hyperglycemia (SIH) is a common phenomenon in acute myocardial infarction and is associated with poor prognosis. The relationship between glycemic gap (GG), a marker of SIH, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-associated acute kidney injury (STAAKI) remains unclear. This study aims to explore the predictive value of GG for the risk of STAAKI after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI patients.

Methods: This study retrospectively selected patients diagnosed with STEMI who underwent primary PCI. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with STAAKI. To examine the dose-response relationship between GG and STAAKI, restricted cubic splines (RCS) were employed. The predictive accuracy of the models was assessed using Delong test, net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results: This study included 595 patients, the incidence of STAAKI was 9.2%. Multivariate logistic regression showed LVEF (OR per 1% increase = 0.931, 95% CI: 0.895 ~ 0.969), NT-proBNP (OR per 1 pg/mL increase = 1.579, 95% CI: 1.212 ~ 2.057), and GG (OR per 1 mmol/L increase = 1.379, 95% CI: 1.223 ~ 1.554) as independent predictors of STAAKI. RCS analysis indicated a linear dose-response relationship between GG and STAAKI. After integrating GG, the new model could significantly improve the risk model for STAAKI (Z = 2.77, NRI = 0.780, and IDI = 0.095; All P < 0.05).

Conclusion: GG is an independent risk factor for the occurrence of STAAKI after PCI in STEMI patients, and integrating GG can significantly improve risk modeling regarding STAAKI.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

血糖间隙对st段抬高型心肌梗死相关性急性肾损伤的预后价值。
背景:应激性高血糖(SIH)是急性心肌梗死的常见现象,且与预后不良有关。血糖间隙(GG)是SIH的标志,与st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)相关急性肾损伤(STAAKI)之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨GG对STEMI患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后STAAKI风险的预测价值。方法:本研究回顾性选择诊断为STEMI并接受首次PCI治疗的患者。采用Logistic回归分析确定与STAAKI相关的危险因素。为了检验GG和STAAKI之间的剂量-反应关系,采用了限制性三次样条(RCS)。采用Delong检验、净重分类指数(NRI)和综合判别改进(IDI)对模型的预测精度进行评价。结果:本研究纳入595例患者,STAAKI发生率为9.2%。多因素logistic回归显示,LVEF(每增加1%的OR = 0.931, 95% CI: 0.895 ~ 0.969)、NT-proBNP(每增加1 pg/mL的OR = 1.579, 95% CI: 1.212 ~ 2.057)和GG(每增加1 mmol/L的OR = 1.379, 95% CI: 1.223 ~ 1.554)是STAAKI的独立预测因子。RCS分析显示,GG与STAAKI呈线性剂量效应关系。整合GG后,新模型能显著改善STAAKI风险模型(Z = 2.77, NRI = 0.780, IDI = 0.095);结论:GG是STEMI患者PCI术后发生STAAKI的独立危险因素,整合GG可显著改善STAAKI的风险建模。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信