Understanding and integrating the needs and preferences of people living with dementia in the inpatient setting: a qualitative study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Alyse Lennox, Denise Goodwin, Felicity Leavold, Renae Nicol, Velandai Srikanth, Darshini Ayton, Madeleine Berends, Myra Thiessen, Daphne Flynn, Chris Moran
{"title":"Understanding and integrating the needs and preferences of people living with dementia in the inpatient setting: a qualitative study.","authors":"Alyse Lennox, Denise Goodwin, Felicity Leavold, Renae Nicol, Velandai Srikanth, Darshini Ayton, Madeleine Berends, Myra Thiessen, Daphne Flynn, Chris Moran","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05932-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People living with dementia (PLWD) have poorer outcomes than cognitively normal people when admitted to hospital. One reason for this difference is related to the challenges in learning and integrating the needs and preferences of PLWD into clinical care. We aimed to obtain a range of perspectives on the challenges in supporting PLWD in hospital and explore opportunities for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an exploratory qualitative study design, we conducted interviews with nine people supporting PLWD (current / ex-spouses or children of PLWD) and 11 nursing, medical and allied health staff members at a single Australian hospital. Data were thematically analysed using a framework approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants described how best practice in supporting PLWD included understanding and integrating patient needs and highlighted the importance of family and the multidisciplinary team working in partnership. A number of factors inhibiting quality care provision were described, including uncertainty around responsibility for communicating with families to understand needs of PLWD; unsuitable tools; lack of opportunities for families to communicate with staff; and, resource and environmental constraints. Participants discussed potential for improvement, emphasising the need for a pre-emptive, rather than reactive solution. They expressed support for the idea of a 'hospital admission kit', containing both information about PLWD and their familiar items. Implementation considerations were also noted, with various perspectives on the timing of initiation, updating, responsible person(s), format, content and how it should be incorporated into clinical workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that hospital staff and those supporting PLWD felt that integrating the needs and preferences of PLWD into hospital care was important. The concept of a pre-prepared 'toolkit' that was ready in the case of a need to attend hospital was felt to be valid and potentially helpful. More work is required to design aspects such as format, content and the workflows needed to generate accountability and reliability in creating, updating and incorporating it into hospital care.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"342"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12080157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05932-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People living with dementia (PLWD) have poorer outcomes than cognitively normal people when admitted to hospital. One reason for this difference is related to the challenges in learning and integrating the needs and preferences of PLWD into clinical care. We aimed to obtain a range of perspectives on the challenges in supporting PLWD in hospital and explore opportunities for improvement.

Methods: Using an exploratory qualitative study design, we conducted interviews with nine people supporting PLWD (current / ex-spouses or children of PLWD) and 11 nursing, medical and allied health staff members at a single Australian hospital. Data were thematically analysed using a framework approach.

Results: Participants described how best practice in supporting PLWD included understanding and integrating patient needs and highlighted the importance of family and the multidisciplinary team working in partnership. A number of factors inhibiting quality care provision were described, including uncertainty around responsibility for communicating with families to understand needs of PLWD; unsuitable tools; lack of opportunities for families to communicate with staff; and, resource and environmental constraints. Participants discussed potential for improvement, emphasising the need for a pre-emptive, rather than reactive solution. They expressed support for the idea of a 'hospital admission kit', containing both information about PLWD and their familiar items. Implementation considerations were also noted, with various perspectives on the timing of initiation, updating, responsible person(s), format, content and how it should be incorporated into clinical workflows.

Conclusions: We found that hospital staff and those supporting PLWD felt that integrating the needs and preferences of PLWD into hospital care was important. The concept of a pre-prepared 'toolkit' that was ready in the case of a need to attend hospital was felt to be valid and potentially helpful. More work is required to design aspects such as format, content and the workflows needed to generate accountability and reliability in creating, updating and incorporating it into hospital care.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

理解和整合住院痴呆患者的需求和偏好:一项定性研究。
背景:痴呆症患者(PLWD)入院时的预后比认知正常的人差。造成这种差异的一个原因与学习和将PLWD的需求和偏好整合到临床护理中的挑战有关。我们的目的是获得在医院支持PLWD的挑战的一系列观点,并探索改进的机会。方法:采用探索性定性研究设计,我们对澳大利亚一家医院的9名支持PLWD的人(PLWD的现任/前任配偶或子女)和11名护理、医疗和相关卫生工作人员进行了访谈。使用框架方法对数据进行主题分析。结果:参与者描述了支持PLWD的最佳实践如何包括理解和整合患者需求,并强调了家庭和多学科团队合作的重要性。研究描述了许多抑制优质护理提供的因素,包括与家庭沟通以了解PLWD需求的责任不确定;不合适的工具;缺乏家庭与工作人员沟通的机会;还有,资源和环境的限制。与会者讨论了改进的潜力,强调需要先发制人,而不是被动应对。他们表示支持“住院资料包”的想法,其中既包括有关PLWD的资料,也包括他们熟悉的物品。还注意到实施方面的考虑,对启动时间、更新、负责人、格式、内容以及如何将其纳入临床工作流程有不同的看法。结论:我们发现医院工作人员和那些支持PLWD的人认为将PLWD的需求和偏好纳入医院护理是重要的。在需要去医院的情况下,预先准备的“工具包”的概念被认为是有效的和潜在的帮助。需要做更多的工作来设计格式、内容和工作流程等方面,以便在创建、更新和将其纳入医院护理方面产生问责制和可靠性。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信