Learning Tools Using ChatGPT in the Biochemistry Class: Creating Notes and Performance on Exams.

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Ana Roman, Maria Simaitis, Kate Sheely, Yotam M Roth, John T Tansey, John Cogan
{"title":"Learning Tools Using ChatGPT in the Biochemistry Class: Creating Notes and Performance on Exams.","authors":"Ana Roman, Maria Simaitis, Kate Sheely, Yotam M Roth, John T Tansey, John Cogan","doi":"10.1002/bmb.21904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ChatGPT has emerged as a popular choice in education that has transformed the experience for both teachers and students. This study investigates the performance of ChatGPT in aiding learning in the biochemistry classroom in two ways. We sought to determine how effective ChatGPT 3.5 was in generating study materials for an introductory biochemistry course. A lecture was delivered in class and transcribed. The resulting transcript was curated, then submitted to ChatGPT 3.5 to generate a summary, a set of notes, and an outline. Each artifact was verified and given to students to help prepare for a quiz. Students were asked about the use of AI-generated materials compared to other study materials. Results were bimodal for the AI-generated materials, with some students indicating that the materials were useful while others preferred traditional study materials such as the text or class notes. We also compared the performance of ChatGPT on open-note biochemistry exams that students had taken. The exams were completed by ChatGPT in two modes: with and without access to external tools. Performance metrics were used to evaluate ChatGPT performance and student responses. The results showed that ChatGPT was unable to pass the exams. This research provides valuable insights into the potential of ChatGPT in educational settings, highlighting strengths and limitations. The implications of these findings may inform the design of future AI-assisted tools and contribute to the ongoing discussions surrounding the integration of AI in education.</p>","PeriodicalId":8830,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ChatGPT has emerged as a popular choice in education that has transformed the experience for both teachers and students. This study investigates the performance of ChatGPT in aiding learning in the biochemistry classroom in two ways. We sought to determine how effective ChatGPT 3.5 was in generating study materials for an introductory biochemistry course. A lecture was delivered in class and transcribed. The resulting transcript was curated, then submitted to ChatGPT 3.5 to generate a summary, a set of notes, and an outline. Each artifact was verified and given to students to help prepare for a quiz. Students were asked about the use of AI-generated materials compared to other study materials. Results were bimodal for the AI-generated materials, with some students indicating that the materials were useful while others preferred traditional study materials such as the text or class notes. We also compared the performance of ChatGPT on open-note biochemistry exams that students had taken. The exams were completed by ChatGPT in two modes: with and without access to external tools. Performance metrics were used to evaluate ChatGPT performance and student responses. The results showed that ChatGPT was unable to pass the exams. This research provides valuable insights into the potential of ChatGPT in educational settings, highlighting strengths and limitations. The implications of these findings may inform the design of future AI-assisted tools and contribute to the ongoing discussions surrounding the integration of AI in education.

在生物化学课堂上使用ChatGPT学习工具:创建笔记和考试表现。
ChatGPT已经成为教育领域的一种流行选择,它改变了教师和学生的体验。本研究从两个方面考察了ChatGPT在生物化学课堂上辅助学习的效果。我们试图确定ChatGPT 3.5在为生物化学入门课程生成学习材料方面的有效性。一篇演讲在课堂上发表并记录下来。生成的文本经过整理,然后提交到ChatGPT 3.5以生成摘要、一组注释和大纲。每个工件都经过验证并发给学生,以帮助他们准备测验。学生们被问及与其他学习材料相比,人工智能生成材料的使用情况。对于人工智能生成的材料,结果是双峰的,一些学生表示这些材料有用,而另一些学生则更喜欢传统的学习材料,如文本或课堂笔记。我们还比较了ChatGPT在学生参加的开放式生物化学考试中的表现。ChatGPT通过两种模式完成考试:使用和不使用外部工具。性能指标被用来评估ChatGPT的性能和学生的反应。结果显示,ChatGPT无法通过考试。这项研究为ChatGPT在教育环境中的潜力提供了有价值的见解,突出了优势和局限性。这些发现的意义可能为未来人工智能辅助工具的设计提供信息,并有助于围绕人工智能在教育中的整合进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of BAMBED is to enhance teacher preparation and student learning in Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and related sciences such as Biophysics and Cell Biology, by promoting the world-wide dissemination of educational materials. BAMBED seeks and communicates articles on many topics, including: Innovative techniques in teaching and learning. New pedagogical approaches. Research in biochemistry and molecular biology education. Reviews on emerging areas of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology to provide background for the preparation of lectures, seminars, student presentations, dissertations, etc. Historical Reviews describing "Paths to Discovery". Novel and proven laboratory experiments that have both skill-building and discovery-based characteristics. Reviews of relevant textbooks, software, and websites. Descriptions of software for educational use. Descriptions of multimedia materials such as tutorials on various aspects of biochemistry and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信