Predictability of maxillary canine retraction comparing power arm and non-power arm using 24 sets of In-house clear aligner in premolar extraction case: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sawitt Eurutairat, Natnicha Vongtiang, Sakda Wonghinkong, Somchai Manopatanakul, Peerapong Santiwong, Nita Viwattanatipa
{"title":"Predictability of maxillary canine retraction comparing power arm and non-power arm using 24 sets of In-house clear aligner in premolar extraction case: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Sawitt Eurutairat, Natnicha Vongtiang, Sakda Wonghinkong, Somchai Manopatanakul, Peerapong Santiwong, Nita Viwattanatipa","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05891-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The bowing effect observed during premolar extractions presents a challenge in clear aligner therapy. This study aims to investigate the accuracy of maxillary tooth movement in first premolar extraction cases using the in-house clear aligner (IHCA), comparing the palatal power arm (PA) and non-power arm (control / C).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen adults requiring maxillary first premolars extraction using IHCA were recruited. Using a randomized controlled trial with a split-mouth design, each patient received treatment for both PA and C. Data at the 24th IHCA comprising virtual-power arm (VPa), virtual-control (VC), actual-power arm (APa) and actual-control (AC) were measured by superimposition with pretreatment digital model, using 3D GOM Inspect software. Six types of tooth movement were assessed. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the differences between groups. Root mean square error (RMSE) as predictability was computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the maxillary canine, there was no significant difference between the PA and C groups for all types of tooth movement except rotation. Specifically, the PA exhibited a significantly less difference in distal-in rotation compared to the control group (APa-VPa -3.54°/AC-VC -11.57°). Similarly, the RMSE of PA demonstrated better accuracy in rotation than the control (PA 7.85°/control 15.98°). In terms of anchorage, the RMSE of PA indicated greater deviation than the control in the second premolar mesial-in rotation and crown-tipping. Regarding the first molar, the RMSE of PA was mostly similar to that of the control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IHCA can effectively retract maxillary canines in cases involving premolar extraction. However, although palatal power arms improve the accuracy of canine rotation, no notable benefits are seen for other types of tooth movement or for anchorage control.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14020146 of the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial. The date of registration was 16/11/2022. The trial was retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"719"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12079856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05891-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The bowing effect observed during premolar extractions presents a challenge in clear aligner therapy. This study aims to investigate the accuracy of maxillary tooth movement in first premolar extraction cases using the in-house clear aligner (IHCA), comparing the palatal power arm (PA) and non-power arm (control / C).

Methods: Eighteen adults requiring maxillary first premolars extraction using IHCA were recruited. Using a randomized controlled trial with a split-mouth design, each patient received treatment for both PA and C. Data at the 24th IHCA comprising virtual-power arm (VPa), virtual-control (VC), actual-power arm (APa) and actual-control (AC) were measured by superimposition with pretreatment digital model, using 3D GOM Inspect software. Six types of tooth movement were assessed. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the differences between groups. Root mean square error (RMSE) as predictability was computed.

Results: For the maxillary canine, there was no significant difference between the PA and C groups for all types of tooth movement except rotation. Specifically, the PA exhibited a significantly less difference in distal-in rotation compared to the control group (APa-VPa -3.54°/AC-VC -11.57°). Similarly, the RMSE of PA demonstrated better accuracy in rotation than the control (PA 7.85°/control 15.98°). In terms of anchorage, the RMSE of PA indicated greater deviation than the control in the second premolar mesial-in rotation and crown-tipping. Regarding the first molar, the RMSE of PA was mostly similar to that of the control.

Conclusion: IHCA can effectively retract maxillary canines in cases involving premolar extraction. However, although palatal power arms improve the accuracy of canine rotation, no notable benefits are seen for other types of tooth movement or for anchorage control.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14020146 of the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial. The date of registration was 16/11/2022. The trial was retrospectively registered.

24套内置式牙齿矫正器对前磨牙拔牙中强力臂与非强力臂的可预见性:一项随机对照试验。
背景:在前磨牙拔除过程中观察到的弯曲效应对透明矫正器治疗提出了挑战。本研究的目的是探讨在第一前磨牙拔牙时,使用内置清晰对准器(IHCA)对上颌牙齿移动的准确性,比较上颌动力臂(PA)和非动力臂(control / C)。方法:选取18例需要采用IHCA拔除上颌第一前磨牙的成人患者。采用裂口设计的随机对照试验,每位患者同时接受PA和c治疗。第24次IHCA的数据包括虚拟动力臂(VPa)、虚拟控制(VC)、实际动力臂(APa)和实际控制(AC),使用3D GOM Inspect软件与预处理数字模型叠加测量。评估六种类型的牙齿运动。采用配对t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较组间差异。计算可预测性的均方根误差(RMSE)。结果:对于上颌犬齿,除旋转外,PA组与C组在所有类型的牙齿运动上均无显著差异。具体而言,与对照组(PA - vpa -3.54°/AC-VC -11.57°)相比,PA在远端旋转方面的差异明显较小。同样,PA的RMSE在旋转上的精度优于对照组(PA为7.85°/对照组为15.98°)。在支抗方面,第二前磨牙中位旋转和冠倾的RMSE偏差大于对照组。对于第一磨牙,PA的RMSE与对照组基本相似。结论:IHCA能有效地收拔前磨牙。然而,虽然腭动力臂提高了犬齿旋转的准确性,但对于其他类型的牙齿运动或锚定控制没有明显的好处。试验注册:当前对照试验ISRCTN14020146国际标准随机对照试验。注册日期为16/11/2022。该试验回顾性登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信