Therapeutic Efficacy of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Combined With Gelatin Sponge Filling in Treating Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Juan Zhang, Quan Liu
{"title":"Therapeutic Efficacy of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Combined With Gelatin Sponge Filling in Treating Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Juan Zhang, Quan Liu","doi":"10.62713/aic.4020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) effectively treats thoracolumbar fractures (TLF) but is plagued by post-operative bone cement leakage. Placing a gelatin sponge in the spinal canal can enhance bone cement viscosity and reduce its fluidity, potentially lowering leakage risks. This study explores the clinical efficacy of PVP combined with gelatin sponge implantation in treating TLF and assesses its role in reducing bone cement leakage and associated postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 120 TLF patients who underwent PVP treatment at the Anji Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital between January 2022 and September 2024. Based on the use of gelatin sponges during the procedure, patients were divided into a control group, which underwent conventional PVP (n = 67), and an observation group, which received PVP combined with gelatin sponge filling (n = 53). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), anterior edge height and Cobb angle of the injured vertebra, and Beck index were comparatively analyzed between the two groups at three-time points: before the operation, 1 day after surgery, and 3 months postoperatively. Furthermore, the rates of bone cement leakage, adjacent vertebral fractures, adverse reactions, and the Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74) scores were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the preoperative values, the VAS scores and ODI were significantly improved in both groups at 1 day and 3 months after the procedure (p < 0.001). The anterior edge height, Cobb angle, and Beck index were significantly recovered (p < 0.001). However, these indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups before the operation, 1 day and 3 months after the procedure (p > 0.05). Within one year postoperatively, the incidence rates of bone cement leakage and adverse reactions were substantially reduced in the observation group than in the control group (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of adjacent vertebral fractures between the two groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no difference was observed in the scores of each dimension of GQOLI-74 between the two groups before operation (p > 0.05). One year after the operation, the scores of each dimension of GQOLI-74 elevated in both groups (p < 0.001), with higher scores observed in the observation group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to PVP alone, PVP combined with gelatin sponge implantation in treating TLF can effectively reduce the incidence of bone cement leakage and associated postoperative adverse reactions while improving overall quality of life one year after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 5","pages":"634-643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.4020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) effectively treats thoracolumbar fractures (TLF) but is plagued by post-operative bone cement leakage. Placing a gelatin sponge in the spinal canal can enhance bone cement viscosity and reduce its fluidity, potentially lowering leakage risks. This study explores the clinical efficacy of PVP combined with gelatin sponge implantation in treating TLF and assesses its role in reducing bone cement leakage and associated postoperative complications.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 120 TLF patients who underwent PVP treatment at the Anji Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital between January 2022 and September 2024. Based on the use of gelatin sponges during the procedure, patients were divided into a control group, which underwent conventional PVP (n = 67), and an observation group, which received PVP combined with gelatin sponge filling (n = 53). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), anterior edge height and Cobb angle of the injured vertebra, and Beck index were comparatively analyzed between the two groups at three-time points: before the operation, 1 day after surgery, and 3 months postoperatively. Furthermore, the rates of bone cement leakage, adjacent vertebral fractures, adverse reactions, and the Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74) scores were compared between the two groups.

Results: Compared to the preoperative values, the VAS scores and ODI were significantly improved in both groups at 1 day and 3 months after the procedure (p < 0.001). The anterior edge height, Cobb angle, and Beck index were significantly recovered (p < 0.001). However, these indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups before the operation, 1 day and 3 months after the procedure (p > 0.05). Within one year postoperatively, the incidence rates of bone cement leakage and adverse reactions were substantially reduced in the observation group than in the control group (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of adjacent vertebral fractures between the two groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no difference was observed in the scores of each dimension of GQOLI-74 between the two groups before operation (p > 0.05). One year after the operation, the scores of each dimension of GQOLI-74 elevated in both groups (p < 0.001), with higher scores observed in the observation group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Compared to PVP alone, PVP combined with gelatin sponge implantation in treating TLF can effectively reduce the incidence of bone cement leakage and associated postoperative adverse reactions while improving overall quality of life one year after surgery.

经皮椎体成形术联合明胶海绵填充治疗胸腰椎骨折疗效回顾分析。
目的:经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗胸腰椎骨折(TLF)疗效显著,但术后骨水泥外溢严重。在椎管内放置明胶海绵可以提高骨水泥的粘度,降低其流动性,潜在地降低骨水泥渗漏的风险。本研究探讨PVP联合明胶海绵植入治疗TLF的临床疗效,并评估其在减少骨水泥渗漏及术后并发症方面的作用。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月至2024年9月在安吉中医院接受PVP治疗的120例TLF患者。根据手术过程中明胶海绵的使用情况,将患者分为对照组(67例)和观察组(53例),对照组采用常规PVP,观察组采用PVP联合明胶海绵充填。比较分析两组患者术前、术后1天、术后3个月三个时间点的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry失能指数(ODI)、损伤椎体前沿高度、Cobb角、Beck指数。此外,比较两组间骨水泥渗漏率、相邻椎体骨折率、不良反应率和通用生活质量量表-74 (GQOLI-74)评分。结果:与术前比较,两组患者术后1天和3个月的VAS评分和ODI均有显著改善(p < 0.001)。前缘高度、Cobb角、Beck指数均显著恢复(p < 0.001)。两组术前、术后1天、3个月各项指标比较差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。术后1年内,观察组骨水泥渗漏及不良反应发生率明显低于对照组(p < 0.05)。两组相邻椎体骨折发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组术前GQOLI-74各维度得分比较,差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。术后1年,两组患者GQOLI-74各维度得分均升高(p < 0.001),其中观察组得分较高(p < 0.05)。结论:与单用PVP相比,PVP联合明胶海绵植入治疗TLF可有效降低骨水泥渗漏及术后相关不良反应的发生率,提高术后1年患者的整体生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信