The Effect of Esketamine as an Adjuvant for Adductor Canal Block on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Shilei Zhao, Zongqiong Lu, Shaoqiong Zhang, Jianhua Wang, Xinyi Ma, Yugang Diao, Huijuan Cao, Yingjie Sun
{"title":"The Effect of Esketamine as an Adjuvant for Adductor Canal Block on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Shilei Zhao, Zongqiong Lu, Shaoqiong Zhang, Jianhua Wang, Xinyi Ma, Yugang Diao, Huijuan Cao, Yingjie Sun","doi":"10.62713/aic.3775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of esketamine as an adjuvant for adductor canal block (ACB) in alleviating postoperative pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 100 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery at The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command of the Chinese People's Liberation Army from October 2022 to March 2023. Patients were randomly and evenly divided into four groups. Patients in the R group received ACB of 0.375% ropivacaine 20 mL before awakening, while patients in the L, M, and H groups received 0.375% ropivacaine 20 mL mixed with 20 mg, 30 mg, and 40 mg of esketamine respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensory block duration of the M and H groups was significantly longer than that of the R group (p = 0.042 and p = 0.003, respectively). Immediately and 8 hours after surgery, the resting and motor pain scores of the M and H groups were significantly reduced (p < 0.05), while the L group also showed a significant decrease at 8 hours after surgery (p = 0.003 and p = 0.032, respectively). Immediately after surgery, subjects of the H group were more deeply sedated than those of both the R and L groups (p = 0.039 and p = 0.041, respectively). However, the recovery quality of group H one day after surgery was worse compared with the other three groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.030, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the use of ropivacaine alone, esketamine adjuvant can prolong the duration of ACB and reduce early postoperative pain. However, high-dose esketamine affects the quality of postoperative recovery and increases the risk of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200065236).</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 5","pages":"617-625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of esketamine as an adjuvant for adductor canal block (ACB) in alleviating postoperative pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery.

Methods: This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 100 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery at The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command of the Chinese People's Liberation Army from October 2022 to March 2023. Patients were randomly and evenly divided into four groups. Patients in the R group received ACB of 0.375% ropivacaine 20 mL before awakening, while patients in the L, M, and H groups received 0.375% ropivacaine 20 mL mixed with 20 mg, 30 mg, and 40 mg of esketamine respectively.

Results: The sensory block duration of the M and H groups was significantly longer than that of the R group (p = 0.042 and p = 0.003, respectively). Immediately and 8 hours after surgery, the resting and motor pain scores of the M and H groups were significantly reduced (p < 0.05), while the L group also showed a significant decrease at 8 hours after surgery (p = 0.003 and p = 0.032, respectively). Immediately after surgery, subjects of the H group were more deeply sedated than those of both the R and L groups (p = 0.039 and p = 0.041, respectively). However, the recovery quality of group H one day after surgery was worse compared with the other three groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.030, respectively).

Conclusions: Compared to the use of ropivacaine alone, esketamine adjuvant can prolong the duration of ACB and reduce early postoperative pain. However, high-dose esketamine affects the quality of postoperative recovery and increases the risk of adverse effects.

Clinical trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200065236).

艾氯胺酮辅助内收管阻滞对膝关节手术患者术后疼痛的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:评价艾氯胺酮辅助内收管阻滞(ACB)对膝关节镜手术患者术后疼痛的缓解效果。方法:这项单中心前瞻性随机对照试验纳入了中国人民解放军北方战区总医院于2022年10月至2023年3月期间接受关节镜膝关节手术的100例患者。患者随机平均分为四组。R组患者在苏醒前给予0.375%罗哌卡因20 mL ACB, L、M、H组患者分别给予0.375%罗哌卡因20 mL与艾氯胺酮20 mg、30 mg、40 mg混合。结果:M、H组感觉阻滞持续时间明显长于R组(p = 0.042、p = 0.003)。术后即刻及术后8 H M、H组静息及运动痛评分均显著降低(p < 0.05),术后8 H L组也显著降低(p = 0.003、p = 0.032)。术后即刻,H组受试者深度镇静程度高于R组和L组(p = 0.039和p = 0.041)。H组术后1 d的恢复质量较其他3组差(p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.030)。结论:与单独使用罗哌卡因相比,艾氯胺酮佐剂可延长ACB持续时间,减轻术后早期疼痛。然而,大剂量艾氯胺酮影响术后恢复质量,增加不良反应的风险。临床试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2200065236)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信