Open access, "piracy" and Article Processing Charges (APC) in Argentina: an informed policy for the national research funding agency.

IF 1.1 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0001-3765202520241184
María Sol Terlizzi, Mariano Zukerfeld, Fernanda Beigel
{"title":"Open access, \"piracy\" and Article Processing Charges (APC) in Argentina: an informed policy for the national research funding agency.","authors":"María Sol Terlizzi, Mariano Zukerfeld, Fernanda Beigel","doi":"10.1590/0001-3765202520241184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article explores the growing influence of Article Processing Charges (APCs) in academic publishing, especially in Argentina, and the challenges they pose for non-hegemonic countries. It highlights the shift from traditional subscription models to open access models, driven by commercial publishers, which often impose significant financial burdens on researchers and institutions. The study aims to examine the issues arising from these models, particularly the commercial open access system, to describes the actions developed by the National Agency for the promotion of Research, Technological Development and Innovation from Argentina, and to discuss some public policy proposals. One major finding is that APCs can exacerbate global inequalities in scientific publishing, as researchers from middle- and low-income countries struggle to afford these fees. This trend can distort research agendas and limit international collaborations. Besides, public research funding agencies play a crucial role in shaping publishing practices, and thus have the power to either promote or hinder more equitable publishing models. The article concludes that non-commercial open access routes, like the \"diamond\" model, should be promoted, and research assessments should shift away from focusing on journal rankings to encourage more responsible research dissemination. The study calls for reforms in both national and global publishing policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7776,"journal":{"name":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","volume":"97 2","pages":"e20241184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202520241184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article explores the growing influence of Article Processing Charges (APCs) in academic publishing, especially in Argentina, and the challenges they pose for non-hegemonic countries. It highlights the shift from traditional subscription models to open access models, driven by commercial publishers, which often impose significant financial burdens on researchers and institutions. The study aims to examine the issues arising from these models, particularly the commercial open access system, to describes the actions developed by the National Agency for the promotion of Research, Technological Development and Innovation from Argentina, and to discuss some public policy proposals. One major finding is that APCs can exacerbate global inequalities in scientific publishing, as researchers from middle- and low-income countries struggle to afford these fees. This trend can distort research agendas and limit international collaborations. Besides, public research funding agencies play a crucial role in shaping publishing practices, and thus have the power to either promote or hinder more equitable publishing models. The article concludes that non-commercial open access routes, like the "diamond" model, should be promoted, and research assessments should shift away from focusing on journal rankings to encourage more responsible research dissemination. The study calls for reforms in both national and global publishing policies.

阿根廷的开放获取、“盗版”和文章处理费(APC):国家研究资助机构的明智政策。
本文探讨了文章处理费(APCs)在学术出版中日益增长的影响力,特别是在阿根廷,以及它们对非霸权国家构成的挑战。它凸显了由商业出版商推动的从传统订阅模式向开放获取模式的转变,这种模式往往给研究人员和机构带来沉重的财政负担。这项研究的目的是审查这些模式,特别是商业开放获取系统所产生的问题,描述阿根廷国家促进研究、技术发展和创新机构所采取的行动,并讨论一些公共政策建议。一个重要的发现是,apc可能加剧全球科学出版的不平等,因为来自中低收入国家的研究人员难以负担这些费用。这种趋势可能扭曲研究议程并限制国际合作。此外,公共研究资助机构在塑造出版实践方面发挥着至关重要的作用,因此有能力促进或阻碍更公平的出版模式。这篇文章的结论是,像“钻石”模式这样的非商业开放获取途径应该得到推广,研究评估应该从关注期刊排名转向鼓励更负责任的研究传播。该研究呼吁对国家和全球出版政策进行改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
347
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Academy of Sciences (BAS) publishes its journal, Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences (AABC, in its Brazilianportuguese acronym ), every 3 months, being the oldest journal in Brazil with conkinuous distribukion, daking back to 1929. This scienkihic journal aims to publish the advances in scienkihic research from both Brazilian and foreigner scienkists, who work in the main research centers in the whole world, always looking for excellence. Essenkially a mulkidisciplinary journal, the AABC cover, with both reviews and original researches, the diverse areas represented in the Academy, such as Biology, Physics, Biomedical Sciences, Chemistry, Agrarian Sciences, Engineering, Mathemakics, Social, Health and Earth Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信