From plant traits to fire behavior: Scaling issues in flammability studies.

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Dylan W Schwilk, Md Azharul Alam, Nathan Gill, Brad R Murray, Rachael H Nolan, Stefania Ondei, George L W Perry, Alistair M S Smith, David M J S Bowman, Alessandra Fidelis, Pedro Jaureguiberry, Imma Oliveras Menor, Bruno H P Rosado, Helena Roland, Marta Yebra, Stephanie G Yelenik, Timothy J Curran
{"title":"From plant traits to fire behavior: Scaling issues in flammability studies.","authors":"Dylan W Schwilk, Md Azharul Alam, Nathan Gill, Brad R Murray, Rachael H Nolan, Stefania Ondei, George L W Perry, Alistair M S Smith, David M J S Bowman, Alessandra Fidelis, Pedro Jaureguiberry, Imma Oliveras Menor, Bruno H P Rosado, Helena Roland, Marta Yebra, Stephanie G Yelenik, Timothy J Curran","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite fire being one of the oldest and most important ecological disturbance processes on Earth, many aspects of fire-vegetation feedbacks are poorly understood, limiting their accurate representation in predictive models. Translating plant flammability traits to fire behavior and fire effects on ecosystems has proven a challenge with different disciplines approaching the problem at widely different scales. One approach has been a top-down assessment of ecosystem-level effects of vegetation structural characteristics and plant physiology on fuel properties such as fuel moisture. This approach has had some success, but is often forced to collapse species-specific variation into a small number of functional types and, as a practical necessity, usually focuses on highly plastic traits (e.g., moisture content) that can be modeled across an ecosystem without the need to characterize species-specific characteristics. The other approach grew out of trait-centric comparative ecology and focused on how traits might influence individual plant flammability. However, the degree to which such lab-based flammability trials reflect real species-specific differences maintained during wildland fires has been questioned. We review the history of these approaches, discuss where each has succeeded, and identify areas of research aimed at closing the apparent gap in scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":" ","pages":"e70040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.70040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite fire being one of the oldest and most important ecological disturbance processes on Earth, many aspects of fire-vegetation feedbacks are poorly understood, limiting their accurate representation in predictive models. Translating plant flammability traits to fire behavior and fire effects on ecosystems has proven a challenge with different disciplines approaching the problem at widely different scales. One approach has been a top-down assessment of ecosystem-level effects of vegetation structural characteristics and plant physiology on fuel properties such as fuel moisture. This approach has had some success, but is often forced to collapse species-specific variation into a small number of functional types and, as a practical necessity, usually focuses on highly plastic traits (e.g., moisture content) that can be modeled across an ecosystem without the need to characterize species-specific characteristics. The other approach grew out of trait-centric comparative ecology and focused on how traits might influence individual plant flammability. However, the degree to which such lab-based flammability trials reflect real species-specific differences maintained during wildland fires has been questioned. We review the history of these approaches, discuss where each has succeeded, and identify areas of research aimed at closing the apparent gap in scale.

从植物性状到火灾行为:可燃性研究中的尺度问题。
尽管火灾是地球上最古老和最重要的生态干扰过程之一,但人们对火灾-植被反馈的许多方面知之甚少,限制了它们在预测模型中的准确表示。将植物可燃性特征转化为火灾行为和火灾对生态系统的影响已经被证明是一个挑战,不同的学科在不同的尺度上研究这个问题。一种方法是自上而下地评估植被结构特征和植物生理对燃料特性(如燃料湿度)的生态系统水平影响。这种方法已经取得了一些成功,但往往被迫将物种特异性变异分解为少数功能类型,并且作为实际需要,通常侧重于可以在整个生态系统中建模的高度可塑性特征(例如,水分含量),而不需要表征物种特异性特征。另一种方法源于以性状为中心的比较生态学,关注性状如何影响单个植物的可燃性。然而,这种基于实验室的可燃性试验在多大程度上反映了野火中保持的物种特异性差异受到质疑。我们回顾了这些方法的历史,讨论了每种方法的成功之处,并确定了旨在缩小规模上明显差距的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信