Thomas Mesaglio, Hervé Sauquet, William K. Cornwell
{"title":"Citizen science records are fuelling exciting discoveries of new plant species","authors":"Thomas Mesaglio, Hervé Sauquet, William K. Cornwell","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Each year, approximately 2000 to 2500 plant species are described as new to science (Cheek et al., <span>2020</span>). However, there are still, at a minimum, tens of thousands of undescribed plant species (Heywood, <span>2017</span>). Many of these have already been collected, with numerous recently named species described from specimens collected and deposited in herbaria decades—or even centuries—ago. Many more undescribed species still reside as vouchers in herbaria, waiting to be examined and recognized as novel, highlighting the immense importance of these institutions for understanding plant diversity globally.</p><p>There are also many undescribed species remaining to be discovered in the field. Traditionally, an important “discovery pathway” for these taxa has been formal collecting expeditions conducted by professional botanists. In some cases, the discovery and description of taxonomic novelties is a primary expedition goal (e.g., Bush Blitz in Australia; Preece et al., <span>2015</span>). However, for many expeditions, species discovery is just one goal competing with others, including the collection of tissue samples for genomics, ecological monitoring, and the possible rediscovery of potentially extinct species. Furthermore, resources and funding dedicated to discovering new species are limited; finding new opportunities for species discovery is therefore essential.</p><p>One such opportunity for discovery is via the citizen science platform iNaturalist (www.inaturalist.org; see Mesaglio, <span>2024</span>), one of the largest sources of contemporary plant occurrence data globally. As of March 2025, over 92 million verifiable records of plants have been uploaded to iNaturalist from around the globe, covering approximately 172,000 identified species submitted by 2.4 million observers. In addition to the hundreds of scientific papers that use iNaturalist data for ecological and conservation studies, at least 12 new plant species have been discovered, and subsequently formally described, since 2022 through records uploaded to iNaturalist. In some cases, these species had already been collected decades ago, but the specimens had been overlooked or identified as an already described species, while in other cases, the iNaturalist observations were the first known records of those species. Excitingly, these species cover a variety of growth habits, taxonomic groups, vegetation communities, and regions (Figure 1) ranging from a shrub in Rutaceae from the thorn forest of Mexico (<i>Megastigma acarrilloi</i>; León, <span>2024</span>), to a geophyte in Iridaceae from the fynbos of South Africa (<i>Moraea anastasia</i>; Manning et al., <span>2025</span>), to a mycoheterotrophic herb in Thismiaceae from moist riparian forest in Colombia (<i>Thismia paradisiaca</i>; Guzmán-Guzmán and Plata-Torres, <span>2023</span>). All of these cases, however, are united by a critically important common denominator: each species was only recognized as novel because of expert engagement with iNaturalist.</p><p>In all published cases thus far, the significance of each observation was only realized once it was seen by an expert. In the specific context of this paper, we define “expert” as a botanist or taxonomist with the knowledge to recognise potential taxonomic novelties from images (see Mesaglio et al., <span>2025</span> for further discussion on defining an expert). Expert encounters with potential novelties on iNaturalist broadly fall into one of three categories: (1) finding the record “incidentally” during regular identification efforts, (2) encountering the record during a more systematic review of all records in a focal taxon as part of a revision or other manuscript, or (3) being directly tagged in or notified about the record by another user soliciting expert feedback. We make two important recommendations for experts based on these different pathways to unearthing taxonomic novelties.</p><p>First, there is high value in experts routinely reviewing iNaturalist observations in their area of expertise, regardless of whether they are actively working on a revision or new descriptions (Mesaglio et al., <span>2025</span>). Tens of thousands of new plant records are uploaded to iNaturalist every day from around the globe, so regularly browsing records, whether daily, weekly, or monthly, maximizes the chances that significant records are found and recognized in a timely manner. The near-constant influx of new records increases the chance of serendipitous discoveries, especially for taxa in regions with many observers, but only if there are experts actively curating these records (e.g., the geophyte <i>Moraea saxatilis</i> was recognized as a taxonomic novelty through review of an observation identified by the observer as “Iridaceae”; Manning and Goldblatt, <span>2024</span>).</p><p>Second, it is important for experts to regularly interact with the iNaturalist community and build awareness of their field of expertise among the broader userbase of amateur naturalists and other experts. One of iNaturalist's great strengths is the facilitation of real-time interactions between users from around the globe, and once an expert has established their area of expertise, other users will notify them of potentially significant records. However, developing these collaboration networks requires time and effort. Regularly identifying records, including described and common species, and actively interacting with other users helps to build awareness and appreciation of expertise among the community, and cultivates a strong culture of sharing records with experts to solicit their input (e.g., the hemiparasitic herb <i>Castilleja salaisolaveae</i> was recognized as a taxonomic novelty after an expert was tagged in an observation by the observer; Egger et al., <span>2022</span>).</p><p>In addition to experts serendipitously encountering records of new plant species, there is also scope for more proactive facilitation of species discovery. We strongly emphasize the importance of meaningful collaborations between experts and observers of putative novelties. For example, experts can offer iNaturalist contributors coauthorship on papers describing new plant species (or even lead authorship for users who may also be scientists with expertise in the field). These collaborations help provide local scientists and naturalists with invaluable opportunities to contribute to and lead research (Adame, <span>2021</span>). Researchers can identify plant diversity “darkspots” (regions containing many undescribed and unrecorded species, sensu Ondo et al., <span>2024</span>) and reach out to relevant “superusers” and other motivated citizen scientists from these regions. Experts can provide guidance on when to conduct searches, which habitats should be targeted, and which characters are important to photograph. Ideally, citizen scientists can also collect specimens for deposition at herbaria provided the appropriate permissions and licensing have been obtained. Experts can provide guidance for inexperienced users on how to make collections, including what makes a good herbarium specimen and when to think twice for rare species or populations.</p><p>We highlight two key directions towards which experts can direct the efforts of citizen scientists. First, there is high value in promoting exploration for ephemeral species that may only appear for a limited time after specific conditions, or species which only form reproductive parts necessary for identification rarely and for short times. One challenge for professional botanists is limited time and resources, making it difficult to rapidly respond to events like bushfires or unusual rainfall events, especially in remote areas, which may create ideal conditions for ephemeral species or flowering episodes. Collaborating with the widespread network of iNaturalist users offers an effective solution. For example, <i>Ovicula biradiata</i> (Asteraceae), a newly described genus and species discovered via iNaturalist, is an ephemeral and range-restricted species that was found in a remote tract of Big Bend National Park in the United States by a citizen scientist searching for rare plants in remote terrain (Manley et al., <span>2025</span>). Harnessing this enthusiasm and desire to contribute to the natural sciences will be a key future direction for expert botanists.</p><p>Second, a strong emphasis can be placed on taxa where diagnostic characters are better captured by photographs of live plants rather than preserved voucher specimens. In situ photographs of flowering individuals uploaded to iNaturalist facilitated the discovery of <i>Caesia walalbai</i> (Hemerocallidaceae) in eastern Australia, as perianth and staminal filament color are important characters within this genus (Webb et al., <span>2023</span>). Numerous specimens of this taxon had already been collected dating back to the 1950s, but these had previously been determined as a more widespread species, and their novelty overlooked because of the loss of floral color when dried. Similarly, <i>Stenostephanus purpureus</i> (Acanthaceae) was recently recognized as a distinct species and separated out from <i>S. silvaticus</i> thanks to photographs uploaded to iNaturalist. A comparison of images of <i>S. silvaticus</i> sensu latu from Mexico and Costa Rica revealed important differences in corolla limb shape and inflorescence axis and corolla color that are often lost or not apparent on many herbarium specimens. Reexamination of herbarium specimens revealed more differences further supporting the description of <i>S. purpureus</i> as a new species restricted to Costa Rica and Panama. There have also been cases where undescribed species were already known from collections, but the discovery of high-quality images of reproductive material on iNaturalist facilitated further specimen collection and subsequent description (e.g., Alvarado-Cardenas et al., <span>2020</span>).</p><p>Given the almost 600 known plant extinctions since 1753, and that undescribed and recently described plant species are more likely to be threatened with extinction (Humphreys et al., <span>2019</span>), there is a strong imperative to accelerate plant species discovery to avoid the extinction of taxa before they are known to Western science. The emergence of iNaturalist as one of the largest sources of plant occurrence records globally has provided a valuable new opportunity for discovering new plant species. By tapping into this resource, expert botanists have the opportunity to build meaningful collaborations with other researchers, naturalists, and citizen scientists from around the world, and help to build our understanding of Earth's flora.</p><p><b>T.M.:</b> Concepualization, Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft; <b>H.S.:</b> Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing; <b>W.K.C.:</b> Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":"112 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajb2.70048","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.70048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Each year, approximately 2000 to 2500 plant species are described as new to science (Cheek et al., 2020). However, there are still, at a minimum, tens of thousands of undescribed plant species (Heywood, 2017). Many of these have already been collected, with numerous recently named species described from specimens collected and deposited in herbaria decades—or even centuries—ago. Many more undescribed species still reside as vouchers in herbaria, waiting to be examined and recognized as novel, highlighting the immense importance of these institutions for understanding plant diversity globally.
There are also many undescribed species remaining to be discovered in the field. Traditionally, an important “discovery pathway” for these taxa has been formal collecting expeditions conducted by professional botanists. In some cases, the discovery and description of taxonomic novelties is a primary expedition goal (e.g., Bush Blitz in Australia; Preece et al., 2015). However, for many expeditions, species discovery is just one goal competing with others, including the collection of tissue samples for genomics, ecological monitoring, and the possible rediscovery of potentially extinct species. Furthermore, resources and funding dedicated to discovering new species are limited; finding new opportunities for species discovery is therefore essential.
One such opportunity for discovery is via the citizen science platform iNaturalist (www.inaturalist.org; see Mesaglio, 2024), one of the largest sources of contemporary plant occurrence data globally. As of March 2025, over 92 million verifiable records of plants have been uploaded to iNaturalist from around the globe, covering approximately 172,000 identified species submitted by 2.4 million observers. In addition to the hundreds of scientific papers that use iNaturalist data for ecological and conservation studies, at least 12 new plant species have been discovered, and subsequently formally described, since 2022 through records uploaded to iNaturalist. In some cases, these species had already been collected decades ago, but the specimens had been overlooked or identified as an already described species, while in other cases, the iNaturalist observations were the first known records of those species. Excitingly, these species cover a variety of growth habits, taxonomic groups, vegetation communities, and regions (Figure 1) ranging from a shrub in Rutaceae from the thorn forest of Mexico (Megastigma acarrilloi; León, 2024), to a geophyte in Iridaceae from the fynbos of South Africa (Moraea anastasia; Manning et al., 2025), to a mycoheterotrophic herb in Thismiaceae from moist riparian forest in Colombia (Thismia paradisiaca; Guzmán-Guzmán and Plata-Torres, 2023). All of these cases, however, are united by a critically important common denominator: each species was only recognized as novel because of expert engagement with iNaturalist.
In all published cases thus far, the significance of each observation was only realized once it was seen by an expert. In the specific context of this paper, we define “expert” as a botanist or taxonomist with the knowledge to recognise potential taxonomic novelties from images (see Mesaglio et al., 2025 for further discussion on defining an expert). Expert encounters with potential novelties on iNaturalist broadly fall into one of three categories: (1) finding the record “incidentally” during regular identification efforts, (2) encountering the record during a more systematic review of all records in a focal taxon as part of a revision or other manuscript, or (3) being directly tagged in or notified about the record by another user soliciting expert feedback. We make two important recommendations for experts based on these different pathways to unearthing taxonomic novelties.
First, there is high value in experts routinely reviewing iNaturalist observations in their area of expertise, regardless of whether they are actively working on a revision or new descriptions (Mesaglio et al., 2025). Tens of thousands of new plant records are uploaded to iNaturalist every day from around the globe, so regularly browsing records, whether daily, weekly, or monthly, maximizes the chances that significant records are found and recognized in a timely manner. The near-constant influx of new records increases the chance of serendipitous discoveries, especially for taxa in regions with many observers, but only if there are experts actively curating these records (e.g., the geophyte Moraea saxatilis was recognized as a taxonomic novelty through review of an observation identified by the observer as “Iridaceae”; Manning and Goldblatt, 2024).
Second, it is important for experts to regularly interact with the iNaturalist community and build awareness of their field of expertise among the broader userbase of amateur naturalists and other experts. One of iNaturalist's great strengths is the facilitation of real-time interactions between users from around the globe, and once an expert has established their area of expertise, other users will notify them of potentially significant records. However, developing these collaboration networks requires time and effort. Regularly identifying records, including described and common species, and actively interacting with other users helps to build awareness and appreciation of expertise among the community, and cultivates a strong culture of sharing records with experts to solicit their input (e.g., the hemiparasitic herb Castilleja salaisolaveae was recognized as a taxonomic novelty after an expert was tagged in an observation by the observer; Egger et al., 2022).
In addition to experts serendipitously encountering records of new plant species, there is also scope for more proactive facilitation of species discovery. We strongly emphasize the importance of meaningful collaborations between experts and observers of putative novelties. For example, experts can offer iNaturalist contributors coauthorship on papers describing new plant species (or even lead authorship for users who may also be scientists with expertise in the field). These collaborations help provide local scientists and naturalists with invaluable opportunities to contribute to and lead research (Adame, 2021). Researchers can identify plant diversity “darkspots” (regions containing many undescribed and unrecorded species, sensu Ondo et al., 2024) and reach out to relevant “superusers” and other motivated citizen scientists from these regions. Experts can provide guidance on when to conduct searches, which habitats should be targeted, and which characters are important to photograph. Ideally, citizen scientists can also collect specimens for deposition at herbaria provided the appropriate permissions and licensing have been obtained. Experts can provide guidance for inexperienced users on how to make collections, including what makes a good herbarium specimen and when to think twice for rare species or populations.
We highlight two key directions towards which experts can direct the efforts of citizen scientists. First, there is high value in promoting exploration for ephemeral species that may only appear for a limited time after specific conditions, or species which only form reproductive parts necessary for identification rarely and for short times. One challenge for professional botanists is limited time and resources, making it difficult to rapidly respond to events like bushfires or unusual rainfall events, especially in remote areas, which may create ideal conditions for ephemeral species or flowering episodes. Collaborating with the widespread network of iNaturalist users offers an effective solution. For example, Ovicula biradiata (Asteraceae), a newly described genus and species discovered via iNaturalist, is an ephemeral and range-restricted species that was found in a remote tract of Big Bend National Park in the United States by a citizen scientist searching for rare plants in remote terrain (Manley et al., 2025). Harnessing this enthusiasm and desire to contribute to the natural sciences will be a key future direction for expert botanists.
Second, a strong emphasis can be placed on taxa where diagnostic characters are better captured by photographs of live plants rather than preserved voucher specimens. In situ photographs of flowering individuals uploaded to iNaturalist facilitated the discovery of Caesia walalbai (Hemerocallidaceae) in eastern Australia, as perianth and staminal filament color are important characters within this genus (Webb et al., 2023). Numerous specimens of this taxon had already been collected dating back to the 1950s, but these had previously been determined as a more widespread species, and their novelty overlooked because of the loss of floral color when dried. Similarly, Stenostephanus purpureus (Acanthaceae) was recently recognized as a distinct species and separated out from S. silvaticus thanks to photographs uploaded to iNaturalist. A comparison of images of S. silvaticus sensu latu from Mexico and Costa Rica revealed important differences in corolla limb shape and inflorescence axis and corolla color that are often lost or not apparent on many herbarium specimens. Reexamination of herbarium specimens revealed more differences further supporting the description of S. purpureus as a new species restricted to Costa Rica and Panama. There have also been cases where undescribed species were already known from collections, but the discovery of high-quality images of reproductive material on iNaturalist facilitated further specimen collection and subsequent description (e.g., Alvarado-Cardenas et al., 2020).
Given the almost 600 known plant extinctions since 1753, and that undescribed and recently described plant species are more likely to be threatened with extinction (Humphreys et al., 2019), there is a strong imperative to accelerate plant species discovery to avoid the extinction of taxa before they are known to Western science. The emergence of iNaturalist as one of the largest sources of plant occurrence records globally has provided a valuable new opportunity for discovering new plant species. By tapping into this resource, expert botanists have the opportunity to build meaningful collaborations with other researchers, naturalists, and citizen scientists from around the world, and help to build our understanding of Earth's flora.
T.M.: Concepualization, Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft; H.S.: Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing; W.K.C.: Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing.
每年约有2000至2500种植物被描述为科学上的新物种(Cheek et al., 2020)。然而,至少仍有数万种未被描述的植物物种(Heywood, 2017)。其中许多已经被收集,许多最近命名的物种是从几十年前甚至几个世纪前收集和保存在植物标本室的标本中描述的。许多未被描述的物种仍然作为凭证存在于植物标本室,等待被检查并被认为是新的,突出了这些机构对了解全球植物多样性的巨大重要性。在野外还有许多未被描述的物种有待发现。传统上,这些分类群的重要“发现途径”是由专业植物学家进行的正式采集探险。在某些情况下,发现和描述分类上的新事物是考察的主要目标(例如,澳大利亚的布什闪电战;Preece et al., 2015)。然而,对于许多探险来说,物种发现只是一个与其他目标竞争的目标,包括为基因组学收集组织样本,生态监测,以及可能重新发现潜在灭绝物种。此外,用于发现新物种的资源和资金是有限的;因此,为物种发现寻找新的机会至关重要。一个这样的发现机会是通过公民科学平台iNaturalist (www.inaturalist.org;(见Mesaglio, 2024),全球当代植物发生数据的最大来源之一。截至2025年3月,全球已有超过9200万份可核实的植物记录上传到iNaturalist网站,涵盖了240万名观察者提交的约17.2万个已确定的物种。除了数百篇利用iNaturalist数据进行生态和保护研究的科学论文外,自2022年以来,至少有12种新的植物物种被发现,并随后通过上传到iNaturalist的记录被正式描述。在某些情况下,这些物种在几十年前就已经被收集了,但这些标本被忽视了,或者被认为是一个已经被描述过的物种,而在其他情况下,自然学家的观察是这些物种的第一次已知记录。令人兴奋的是,这些物种涵盖了各种生长习性、分类类群、植被群落和地区(图1),从墨西哥荆棘林的芦花科灌木(Megastigma acarrilloi);León, 2024),到一种来自南非菲恩波斯的鸢尾科地植物(Moraea anastasia;Manning et al., 2025),到一种来自哥伦比亚潮湿河岸森林的蕨科真菌异养草本(Thismia paradisiaca;Guzmán-Guzmán and Plata-Torres, 2023)。然而,所有这些案例都有一个至关重要的共同点:每个物种被认为是新颖的,只是因为与iNaturalist的专家接触。到目前为止,在所有已发表的案例中,每次观察的重要性只有在被专家看到后才会意识到。在本文的特定背景下,我们将“专家”定义为具有从图像中识别潜在分类新颖性的知识的植物学家或分类学家(参见Mesaglio等人,2025进一步讨论定义专家)。专家在iNaturalist上遇到潜在的新记录大致分为三类:(1)在常规鉴定工作中“偶然”发现记录;(2)在对焦点分类单元的所有记录进行更系统的审查时遇到记录,作为修订或其他手稿的一部分;或(3)被另一个用户直接标记或通知有关记录,征求专家反馈。基于这些发掘分类学新颖性的不同途径,我们为专家们提出了两个重要建议。首先,专家在他们的专业领域中定期审查自然主义者的观察结果具有很高的价值,无论他们是否正在积极地进行修订或新的描述(Mesaglio et al., 2025)。每天有数以万计来自世界各地的新植物记录被上传到iNaturalist,因此定期浏览记录,无论是每天,每周还是每月,都可以最大限度地增加及时发现和识别重要记录的机会。几乎不断涌入的新记录增加了偶然发现的机会,特别是在有许多观察者的地区的分类群,但只有在有专家积极整理这些记录的情况下(例如,地植物Moraea saxatilis通过观察者鉴定为“鸢尾科”的观察结果而被认为是分类上的新发现;曼宁和戈德布拉特,2024)。其次,专家定期与iNaturalist社区互动,并在业余自然学家和其他专家的更广泛用户群中建立对其专业领域的认识,这一点很重要。 iNaturalist最大的优势之一是促进全球用户之间的实时交互,一旦专家建立了他们的专业领域,其他用户将通知他们潜在的重要记录。然而,开发这些协作网络需要时间和精力。定期识别记录,包括已描述的和常见的物种,并积极与其他用户互动,有助于在社区中建立对专业知识的认识和欣赏,并培养与专家分享记录以征求他们意见的强大文化(例如,在观察者在观察中标记专家后,半寄生植物Castilleja salaisolaveae被认为是分类学上的新异种;Egger et al., 2022)。除了专家们偶然发现新植物物种的记录外,还有更积极主动地促进物种发现的余地。我们强烈强调专家和观察者之间有意义的合作的重要性。例如,专家可以为iNaturalist的作者提供描述新植物物种的论文的合著权(甚至可以为在该领域具有专业知识的科学家的用户提供主要作者)。这些合作为当地科学家和博物学家提供了宝贵的机会,为研究做出贡献并领导研究(Adame, 2021)。研究人员可以识别植物多样性“黑点”(包含许多未描述和未记录物种的区域,sensu Ondo et al., 2024),并与这些地区的相关“超级用户”和其他积极的公民科学家联系。专家可以提供指导,何时进行搜索,哪些栖息地应该作为目标,哪些人物是重要的拍摄。理想情况下,公民科学家也可以在获得适当的许可和许可的情况下收集标本并在植物标本馆存放。专家可以为没有经验的用户提供如何收集的指导,包括什么是好的植物标本馆标本,以及什么时候应该三思而后行。我们强调了专家可以指导公民科学家努力的两个关键方向。首先,促进对那些在特定条件下可能只在有限时间内出现的短暂物种的探索,或那些只在很少和短时间内形成鉴定所必需的生殖部分的物种的探索,具有很高的价值。专业植物学家面临的一个挑战是时间和资源有限,很难对森林大火或异常降雨事件等事件做出快速反应,特别是在偏远地区,这些地区可能为短暂的物种或开花事件创造理想的条件。与广泛的iNaturalist用户网络合作提供了一个有效的解决方案。例如,Ovicula biradiata (Asteraceae)是通过iNaturalist发现的一个新描述的属和种,它是一个短暂的、范围有限的物种,是由一位公民科学家在偏远地区寻找稀有植物时在美国大本德国家公园的一个偏远地区发现的(Manley et al., 2025)。利用这种为自然科学做出贡献的热情和愿望将是专业植物学家未来的关键方向。其次,在分类群中,诊断特征可以通过活体植物的照片而不是保存的凭证标本来更好地捕捉。上传至iNaturalist上的开花个体的原位照片促进了在澳大利亚东部发现的Caesia walalbai(萱草科),因为花被和雌蕊花丝颜色是该属的重要特征(Webb等,2023)。早在20世纪50年代,人们就已经收集了许多这种分类单元的标本,但这些标本之前被认为是一种分布更广的物种,它们的新颖性被忽视了,因为干燥后花的颜色会消失。同样,由于上传到iNaturalist上的照片,最近被认为是一个独特的物种,并从S. silvaticus中分离出来。通过对墨西哥和哥斯达黎加两种植物的花冠瓣形、花序轴和花冠颜色的比较,发现了在许多植物标本馆标本上经常丢失或不明显的花冠瓣形、花序轴和花冠颜色的差异。对植物标本馆标本的重新检查发现了更多的差异,进一步支持了s.p ulpureus作为哥斯达黎加和巴拿马的新种的描述。也有一些情况下,未描述的物种已经从收集中已知,但在iNaturalist上发现的生殖材料的高质量图像促进了进一步的标本收集和随后的描述(例如,Alvarado-Cardenas et al., 2020)。考虑到自1753年以来已知的近600种植物灭绝,以及未描述和最近描述的植物物种更有可能面临灭绝的威胁(Humphreys等人)。 , 2019),迫切需要加快植物物种的发现,以避免分类群在被西方科学所知之前灭绝。iNaturalist作为全球最大的植物发生记录来源之一的出现,为发现新的植物物种提供了宝贵的新机会。通过利用这个资源,专家植物学家有机会与来自世界各地的其他研究人员、自然学家和公民科学家建立有意义的合作,并帮助建立我们对地球植物群的理解。t.m.:概念化、数据管理、调查、可视化、写作-原始稿;H.S.:概念化,写作-审查和编辑;概念化,写作-审查和编辑。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.