Trends and Gaps in Public Perception of Genetic Testing for Dementia Risk: Unsupervised Deep Learning of Twitter Posts From 2010 to 2023.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Natalie Edna Pak, Li Chang Ang, Kaavya Narasimhalu, Tau Ming Liew
{"title":"Trends and Gaps in Public Perception of Genetic Testing for Dementia Risk: Unsupervised Deep Learning of Twitter Posts From 2010 to 2023.","authors":"Natalie Edna Pak, Li Chang Ang, Kaavya Narasimhalu, Tau Ming Liew","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic testing for dementia has drawn public attention in recent years, albeit with concerns on its appropriate use. This study leveraged Twitter data to analyze public perceptions related to genetic testing for dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>English tweets from January 1, 2010 to April 1, 2023, containing relevant terms, were extracted from Twitter API. A Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model was used with Named Entity Recognition (NER) to identify individual and organizational users. BERT-based topic modeling was applied to identify the themes for relevant source tweets. Topic coherence was assessed through manual inspection, complemented by the Silhouette Coefficient. Manual thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke's approach, refined the topics and themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of 3045 original/source tweets identified 9 topics (Silhouette Coefficient=0.19), categorized into 3 main themes: (1) opinions on the appropriateness of genetic testing in dementia diagnosis; (2) discussion on the psychosocial impact; (3) discussion on genetic testing's role in Alzheimer's disease treatment and prevention. Theme 1 comprised 90.6% of source tweets, demonstrating prevailing contentions. Tweets in theme 2 were increasingly contributed by organization users over time and included tweets containing misinformation about genetic testing in children. Tweets in theme 3 were increasingly contributed by individual users, possibly suggesting rising public interest in the treatment and prevention of dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlighted limited public understanding of the nondeterministic nature of genetic testing for dementia, with concerns about unsupervised direct-to-consumer genetic test marketing, emphasizing the need to counter misinformation and raise public awareness.</p>","PeriodicalId":7679,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000667","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Genetic testing for dementia has drawn public attention in recent years, albeit with concerns on its appropriate use. This study leveraged Twitter data to analyze public perceptions related to genetic testing for dementia.

Methods: English tweets from January 1, 2010 to April 1, 2023, containing relevant terms, were extracted from Twitter API. A Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model was used with Named Entity Recognition (NER) to identify individual and organizational users. BERT-based topic modeling was applied to identify the themes for relevant source tweets. Topic coherence was assessed through manual inspection, complemented by the Silhouette Coefficient. Manual thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke's approach, refined the topics and themes.

Results: The analysis of 3045 original/source tweets identified 9 topics (Silhouette Coefficient=0.19), categorized into 3 main themes: (1) opinions on the appropriateness of genetic testing in dementia diagnosis; (2) discussion on the psychosocial impact; (3) discussion on genetic testing's role in Alzheimer's disease treatment and prevention. Theme 1 comprised 90.6% of source tweets, demonstrating prevailing contentions. Tweets in theme 2 were increasingly contributed by organization users over time and included tweets containing misinformation about genetic testing in children. Tweets in theme 3 were increasingly contributed by individual users, possibly suggesting rising public interest in the treatment and prevention of dementia.

Conclusion: The study highlighted limited public understanding of the nondeterministic nature of genetic testing for dementia, with concerns about unsupervised direct-to-consumer genetic test marketing, emphasizing the need to counter misinformation and raise public awareness.

公众对痴呆症风险基因检测认知的趋势和差距:2010年至2023年Twitter帖子的无监督深度学习。
背景:近年来,痴呆症的基因检测引起了公众的关注,尽管对其适当使用存在担忧。这项研究利用推特数据来分析公众对痴呆症基因检测的看法。方法:从Twitter API中提取2010年1月1日至2023年4月1日包含相关词汇的英文推文。将双向编码器变形表示(BERT)模型与命名实体识别(NER)一起用于识别个人和组织用户。基于bert的主题建模用于识别相关源tweet的主题。主题一致性通过人工检查评估,辅以剪影系数。手工主题分析,遵循布劳恩和克拉克的方法,提炼了主题和主题。结果:对3045条原始/源推文的分析确定了9个主题(剪影系数=0.19),分为3个主题:(1)关于基因检测在痴呆诊断中的适当性的意见;(2)心理社会影响探讨;(3)探讨基因检测在阿尔茨海默病治疗和预防中的作用。主题1占源推文的90.6%,展示了流行的观点。随着时间的推移,组织用户在主题2中的推文越来越多,其中包括包含有关儿童基因检测错误信息的推文。主题3的推文越来越多地由个人用户贡献,这可能表明公众对治疗和预防痴呆症的兴趣日益浓厚。结论:该研究强调了公众对痴呆症基因检测的不确定性的有限理解,以及对无监督的直接面向消费者的基因检测营销的担忧,强调了反击错误信息和提高公众意识的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: ​Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of clinicians and researchers, with primary emphasis on Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The journal publishes original articles emphasizing research in humans including epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and experimental studies, studies of diagnosis and biomarkers, as well as research on the health of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The scientific portion of the journal is augmented by reviews of the current literature, concepts, conjectures, and hypotheses in dementia, brief reports, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信