Modern wheat has deeper roots than ancient wheats, is this an adaptation to higher productivity?

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Arnesta Odone, Kristian Thorup-Kristensen
{"title":"Modern wheat has deeper roots than ancient wheats, is this an adaptation to higher productivity?","authors":"Arnesta Odone, Kristian Thorup-Kristensen","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>There is growing interest in production of ancient grains including emmer, einkorn and spelt, particularly in low input systems. Differences in their root systems and how these affect water and nitrogen uptake are not well known, but can offer important insights into the effects of plant breeding on resource use and root physiology, which can inform breeding of future crops.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we used imaging in minirhizotron tubes to evaluate root development in emmer, einkorn, spelt and modern wheat growing under field conditions, taking images to 2.2m soil depth. We evaluated water stress in the different species using carbon isotope discrimination and used a nitrogen tracer to compare N uptake over time.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The results show that modern wheats have deeper and more efficient root systems. Modern wheats showed less water stress in late developmental stages due to their deeper roots which allow access to deep soil water, and can therefore sustain high grain yields. They were also able to translocate N more efficiently to the grain. The results contradict previous hypotheses that modern wheat has shallow rooting systems due to high inputs, showing that where more nutrient resources are available, deeper roots have become important for water uptake to support higher yields.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first field study of roots of ancient and modern wheats, where we clearly see that there are substantial differences between the root systems. These results help to explain how past selection for yield has affected belowground crop physiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: There is growing interest in production of ancient grains including emmer, einkorn and spelt, particularly in low input systems. Differences in their root systems and how these affect water and nitrogen uptake are not well known, but can offer important insights into the effects of plant breeding on resource use and root physiology, which can inform breeding of future crops.

Methods: In this study, we used imaging in minirhizotron tubes to evaluate root development in emmer, einkorn, spelt and modern wheat growing under field conditions, taking images to 2.2m soil depth. We evaluated water stress in the different species using carbon isotope discrimination and used a nitrogen tracer to compare N uptake over time.

Key results: The results show that modern wheats have deeper and more efficient root systems. Modern wheats showed less water stress in late developmental stages due to their deeper roots which allow access to deep soil water, and can therefore sustain high grain yields. They were also able to translocate N more efficiently to the grain. The results contradict previous hypotheses that modern wheat has shallow rooting systems due to high inputs, showing that where more nutrient resources are available, deeper roots have become important for water uptake to support higher yields.

Conclusions: This is the first field study of roots of ancient and modern wheats, where we clearly see that there are substantial differences between the root systems. These results help to explain how past selection for yield has affected belowground crop physiology.

现代小麦的根比古代小麦更深,这是为了适应更高的产量吗?
背景和目的:人们对古代谷物的生产越来越感兴趣,包括二粒小麦、玉米和斯佩尔特小麦,特别是在低投入系统中。它们根系的差异以及这些差异如何影响水分和氮的吸收尚不清楚,但可以为植物育种对资源利用和根系生理的影响提供重要见解,这可以为未来作物的育种提供信息。方法:在本研究中,我们采用微型管成像技术,对田间条件下生长的二粒小麦、小麦、斯佩尔特小麦和现代小麦的根系发育进行了评价,成像深度为2.2m。我们利用碳同位素判别法评估了不同物种的水分胁迫,并使用氮示踪剂比较了不同时间的氮吸收。关键结果:结果表明,现代小麦具有更深和更有效的根系。现代小麦在发育后期表现出较少的水分胁迫,因为它们的根系较深,可以获得深层土壤水分,因此可以维持较高的粮食产量。它们还能更有效地将氮转运到粮食上。结果与之前的假设相矛盾,即现代小麦由于高投入而具有浅根系统,这表明在有更多营养资源可用的地方,较深的根系对于水分吸收以支持更高的产量变得重要。结论:这是对古代和现代小麦根系的第一次实地研究,我们清楚地看到根系之间存在实质性差异。这些结果有助于解释过去的产量选择是如何影响地下作物生理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信