Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Cold-Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Michael S Kaminer, Rui L Avelar, Leslie Baumann, Valerie Callender, Steven H Dayan, Jeremy B Green, Steven K Grekin, Sebastien Guyon
{"title":"Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Cold-Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study.","authors":"Michael S Kaminer, Rui L Avelar, Leslie Baumann, Valerie Callender, Steven H Dayan, Jeremy B Green, Steven K Grekin, Sebastien Guyon","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>EVOLYSSE FORM (EVLF) and EVOLYSSE SMOOTH (EVLS) are new hyaluronic acid fillers created using an innovative cold crosslinking process.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To collect safety and effectiveness data on new cold-crosslinked fillers to support US approval for the correction of moderate to severe dynamic facial wrinkles and folds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, controlled, split-face study, 140 subjects with moderate to severe nasolabial folds received a cold-crosslinked filler in 1 nasolabial fold (EVLF = 70, EVLS = 70) and a traditionally-crosslinked filler, Restylane-L (RESL), in the contralateral fold and were followed through 12 months with an optional retreatment at that timepoint and subsequent 3 months of safety follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoint of mean Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale change from baseline to Month 6 as rated by photographic review panel demonstrated non-inferiority and statistical superiority for the cold-crosslinked fillers. Blinded evaluator Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale assessments showed a mean change from baseline that was statistically significantly better than RESL for EVLF at all visits through 12 months and for EVLS at 6 and 9 months. Most subjects were responders on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale throughout the study according to ratings by blinded evaluators, treating investigators, and subjects. The FACE-Q Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds overall mean score showed significant improvement from baseline (p < 0.0001) at all timepoints through Month 12 for all treatment groups. All treatments were well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new cold-crosslinked fillers were shown to be safe and effective for correction of nasolabial folds, with results lasting for 1 year.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: EVOLYSSE FORM (EVLF) and EVOLYSSE SMOOTH (EVLS) are new hyaluronic acid fillers created using an innovative cold crosslinking process.

Objectives: To collect safety and effectiveness data on new cold-crosslinked fillers to support US approval for the correction of moderate to severe dynamic facial wrinkles and folds.

Methods: In this randomized, controlled, split-face study, 140 subjects with moderate to severe nasolabial folds received a cold-crosslinked filler in 1 nasolabial fold (EVLF = 70, EVLS = 70) and a traditionally-crosslinked filler, Restylane-L (RESL), in the contralateral fold and were followed through 12 months with an optional retreatment at that timepoint and subsequent 3 months of safety follow-up.

Results: The primary endpoint of mean Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale change from baseline to Month 6 as rated by photographic review panel demonstrated non-inferiority and statistical superiority for the cold-crosslinked fillers. Blinded evaluator Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale assessments showed a mean change from baseline that was statistically significantly better than RESL for EVLF at all visits through 12 months and for EVLS at 6 and 9 months. Most subjects were responders on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale throughout the study according to ratings by blinded evaluators, treating investigators, and subjects. The FACE-Q Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds overall mean score showed significant improvement from baseline (p < 0.0001) at all timepoints through Month 12 for all treatment groups. All treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusions: The new cold-crosslinked fillers were shown to be safe and effective for correction of nasolabial folds, with results lasting for 1 year.

冷交联透明质酸填充剂的长期安全性和有效性:多中心、随机、对照、双盲研究。
EVOLYSSE FORM (EVLF)和EVOLYSSE SMOOTH (EVLS)是采用创新的冷交联工艺创建的新型透明质酸填充剂。目的:收集新型冷交联填充剂的安全性和有效性数据,以支持美国批准用于纠正中度至重度动态面部皱纹和褶皱。方法:在这项随机、对照、裂面研究中,140名中度至重度鼻唇沟患者在一侧鼻唇沟(EVLF = 70, EVLS = 70)接受冷交联填充物(EVLF = 70),在对侧鼻唇沟接受传统交联填充物Restylane-L (RESL),随访12个月,在该时间点可选择再治疗,随后进行3个月的安全随访。结果:照片评审小组评定的皱纹严重性评定量表从基线到第6个月的平均变化的主要终点显示冷交联填料的非劣效性和统计学优势。盲法评估者皱纹严重程度评定量表评估显示,EVLF在12个月和EVLS在6个月和9个月的所有访问中从基线开始的平均变化在统计学上显著优于RESL。在整个研究过程中,根据盲法评估者、治疗研究者和受试者的评分,大多数受试者对全球审美改善量表有反应。到第12个月,所有治疗组的FACE-Q鼻唇襞总平均评分均较基线有显著改善(p < 0.0001)。所有治疗均耐受良好。结论:新型冷交联填充剂用于鼻唇沟矫正安全有效,效果持续1年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信