Antidepressants in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.20524/aog.2025.0962
Maria José Temido, Margarida Cristiano, Carolina Gouveia, Bárbara Mesquita, Pedro Figueiredo, Francisco Portela
{"title":"Antidepressants in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Maria José Temido, Margarida Cristiano, Carolina Gouveia, Bárbara Mesquita, Pedro Figueiredo, Francisco Portela","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) treatment relies on a low level of evidence. In this systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials we assessed the efficacy of antidepressants in IBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024502427). PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 2024. Only randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were included. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane tool (RoB 2). A random-effects model was used. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic and publication bias by funnel plots and the Egger test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy identified 1340 studies, of which 20 were included in the systematic review and 16 in the meta-analysis, totaling 1428 patients. The meta-analysis unveiled the efficacy of antidepressants in patients with IBS in overall symptom improvement (odds ratio [OR] 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.16-4.2). Subgroup analysis revealed similar results regarding the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants (OR 3.39, 95%CI 2.24-5.12); of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (OR 2.39, 95%CI 1.14-5.01); in patients refractory to first-line measures (OR 2.96, 95%CI 1.67-5.25); in patients without known comorbid psychological conditions (OR 2.92, 95%CI 1.6-5.31); and in the improvement in abdominal pain (OR 3.27, 95%CI 1.63-6.53), and bloating (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.11-5.22). Publication bias was detected, and potential sources were identified. Sub-analysis without these sources of bias revealed similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antidepressants demonstrate efficacy in IBS. These medications can be beneficial to patients resistant to initial treatments and those lacking psychopathological symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 3","pages":"284-293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) treatment relies on a low level of evidence. In this systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials we assessed the efficacy of antidepressants in IBS.

Methods: This study followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024502427). PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 2024. Only randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were included. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane tool (RoB 2). A random-effects model was used. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the I 2 statistic and publication bias by funnel plots and the Egger test.

Results: The search strategy identified 1340 studies, of which 20 were included in the systematic review and 16 in the meta-analysis, totaling 1428 patients. The meta-analysis unveiled the efficacy of antidepressants in patients with IBS in overall symptom improvement (odds ratio [OR] 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.16-4.2). Subgroup analysis revealed similar results regarding the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants (OR 3.39, 95%CI 2.24-5.12); of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (OR 2.39, 95%CI 1.14-5.01); in patients refractory to first-line measures (OR 2.96, 95%CI 1.67-5.25); in patients without known comorbid psychological conditions (OR 2.92, 95%CI 1.6-5.31); and in the improvement in abdominal pain (OR 3.27, 95%CI 1.63-6.53), and bloating (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.11-5.22). Publication bias was detected, and potential sources were identified. Sub-analysis without these sources of bias revealed similar results.

Conclusions: Antidepressants demonstrate efficacy in IBS. These medications can be beneficial to patients resistant to initial treatments and those lacking psychopathological symptoms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抗抑郁药治疗肠易激综合征:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:肠易激综合征(IBS)的治疗依赖于低水平的证据。在这篇随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析的系统综述中,我们评估了抗抑郁药对肠易激综合征的疗效。方法:本研究遵循PRISMA指南,并在PROSPERO数据库中注册(CRD42024502427)。PubMed, EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆从成立到2024年1月进行了检索。仅纳入随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。使用Cochrane工具评估证据质量(RoB 2)。采用随机效应模型。异质性评价采用i2统计量,发表偏倚采用漏斗图和Egger检验。结果:检索策略确定了1340项研究,其中20项纳入系统评价,16项纳入荟萃分析,共计1428例患者。荟萃分析揭示了抗抑郁药对IBS患者整体症状改善的疗效(优势比[OR] 3.02;95%置信区间[CI] 2.16-4.2)。亚组分析显示三环类抗抑郁药的疗效相似(OR 3.39, 95%CI 2.24-5.12);选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(OR 2.39, 95%CI 1.14-5.01);一线措施难治性患者(OR 2.96, 95%CI 1.67-5.25);无已知心理合并症的患者(OR 2.92, 95%CI 1.6-5.31);改善腹痛(OR 3.27, 95%CI 1.63-6.53)和腹胀(OR 2.4, 95%CI 1.11-5.22)。发现发表偏倚,并确定潜在来源。没有这些偏倚来源的亚分析显示了类似的结果。结论:抗抑郁药物对IBS有疗效。这些药物对最初治疗有抵抗力的患者和缺乏精神病理症状的患者有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信