Long-Term Transfusion Independence with Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the COMMANDS Trial.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Valeria Santini, Amer M Zeidan, Rami S Komrokji, Veronika Pozharskaya, Shelonitda Rose, Karen Keeperman, Yinzhi Lai, Sameer Kalsekar, Barkha Aggarwal, Dimana Miteva, David Valcárcel, Pierre Fenaux, Jake Shortt, Matteo Giovanni Della Porta, Uwe Platzbecker
{"title":"Long-Term Transfusion Independence with Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the COMMANDS Trial.","authors":"Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Valeria Santini, Amer M Zeidan, Rami S Komrokji, Veronika Pozharskaya, Shelonitda Rose, Karen Keeperman, Yinzhi Lai, Sameer Kalsekar, Barkha Aggarwal, Dimana Miteva, David Valcárcel, Pierre Fenaux, Jake Shortt, Matteo Giovanni Della Porta, Uwe Platzbecker","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03208-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The efficacy of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for transfusion-dependent (TD) anemia in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) is limited. Luspatercept achieved significantly greater rates of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI) versus epoetin alfa (an ESA) in the phase 3 COMMANDS trial. This analysis assessed long-term RBC-TI, cumulative response, and safety with luspatercept in COMMANDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years, with ESA-naive, RBC TD LR-MDS were randomized 1:1 to receive luspatercept (1.0 mg/kg, titration to 1.75 mg/kg permitted) or epoetin alfa (450 IU/kg, titration to 1050 IU/kg). Disease assessment was carried out at week 24 (day 169) and every 24 weeks thereafter. Treatment continued until disease progression, lack of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At data cutoff (September 22, 2023; median follow-up: luspatercept 21.4 months, epoetin alfa 20.3 months), a greater proportion of patients treated with luspatercept (n = 182) versus epoetin alfa (n = 181) achieved a longest single RBC-TI period ≥ 1 year (44.5% vs. 27.6%; P = 0.0003) and ≥ 1.5 years (30.2% vs. 13.8%; P < 0.0001). Higher rates of RBC-TI ≥ 1.5 years with luspatercept over epoetin alfa were consistent across all prespecified subgroups, including patients with ring sideroblast-negative status and low baseline serum erythropoietin. Longer cumulative RBC-TI response [sum of all durations of RBC-TI for ≥ 12 weeks; week 1 to end of treatment (95% CI)] was observed with luspatercept [154.7 weeks (118.4-NR)] versus epoetin alfa [91.1 weeks (73.1-123.9)]. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events, including asthenia and hypertension, generally decreased over time in both arms. Progression rates to high-risk MDS and acute myeloid leukemia were similarly low (< 5%) in both treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data demonstrated sustained, durable clinical benefit across subgroups and support luspatercept as the treatment of choice for anemia in patients with LR-MDS who are TD and ESA-naive.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03682536.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03208-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for transfusion-dependent (TD) anemia in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) is limited. Luspatercept achieved significantly greater rates of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI) versus epoetin alfa (an ESA) in the phase 3 COMMANDS trial. This analysis assessed long-term RBC-TI, cumulative response, and safety with luspatercept in COMMANDS.

Methods: Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years, with ESA-naive, RBC TD LR-MDS were randomized 1:1 to receive luspatercept (1.0 mg/kg, titration to 1.75 mg/kg permitted) or epoetin alfa (450 IU/kg, titration to 1050 IU/kg). Disease assessment was carried out at week 24 (day 169) and every 24 weeks thereafter. Treatment continued until disease progression, lack of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.

Results: At data cutoff (September 22, 2023; median follow-up: luspatercept 21.4 months, epoetin alfa 20.3 months), a greater proportion of patients treated with luspatercept (n = 182) versus epoetin alfa (n = 181) achieved a longest single RBC-TI period ≥ 1 year (44.5% vs. 27.6%; P = 0.0003) and ≥ 1.5 years (30.2% vs. 13.8%; P < 0.0001). Higher rates of RBC-TI ≥ 1.5 years with luspatercept over epoetin alfa were consistent across all prespecified subgroups, including patients with ring sideroblast-negative status and low baseline serum erythropoietin. Longer cumulative RBC-TI response [sum of all durations of RBC-TI for ≥ 12 weeks; week 1 to end of treatment (95% CI)] was observed with luspatercept [154.7 weeks (118.4-NR)] versus epoetin alfa [91.1 weeks (73.1-123.9)]. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events, including asthenia and hypertension, generally decreased over time in both arms. Progression rates to high-risk MDS and acute myeloid leukemia were similarly low (< 5%) in both treatment arms.

Conclusions: These data demonstrated sustained, durable clinical benefit across subgroups and support luspatercept as the treatment of choice for anemia in patients with LR-MDS who are TD and ESA-naive.

Trial registration number: NCT03682536.

长期输血不依赖Luspatercept与促红细胞生成素- α在红细胞生成素-刺激剂初始,低风险骨髓增生异常综合征的COMMANDS试验。
前言:红细胞生成刺激剂(ESAs)治疗低风险骨髓增生异常综合征(LR-MDS)患者输血依赖性(TD)贫血的疗效有限。在3期COMMANDS试验中,Luspatercept的红细胞(RBC)输血独立性(TI)率明显高于epoetin alfa(一种ESA)。该分析评估了luspaterept在command中的长期RBC-TI、累积反应和安全性。方法:年龄≥18岁,ESA-naive, RBC TD LR-MDS患者按1:1随机分配,接受luspatercept (1.0 mg/kg,允许滴定至1.75 mg/kg)或eppoetin α (450 IU/kg,滴定至1050 IU/kg)。第24周(第169天)进行疾病评估,此后每24周进行一次疾病评估。治疗持续到疾病进展,缺乏临床获益,不可接受的毒性,或同意退出。结果:截止日期(2023年9月22日);中位随访:luspatercept 21.4个月,epoetin alfa 20.3个月),luspatercept (n = 182)与epoetin alfa (n = 181)相比,更大比例的患者实现了最长的单次红细胞- ti期≥1年(44.5% vs. 27.6%;P = 0.0003)和≥1.5年(30.2% vs. 13.8%;结论:这些数据显示了跨亚组的持续、持久的临床获益,并支持luspatercept作为TD和esa初始的LR-MDS患者贫血的治疗选择。试验注册号:NCT03682536。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信