PD-L1 in lung cytology: the path for standardization.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Acta Cytologica Pub Date : 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1159/000546275
Mohammed S I Mansour, Gennaro Acanfora, Giancarlo Troncone, Hans Brunnström, Elena Vigliar
{"title":"PD-L1 in lung cytology: the path for standardization.","authors":"Mohammed S I Mansour, Gennaro Acanfora, Giancarlo Troncone, Hans Brunnström, Elena Vigliar","doi":"10.1159/000546275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advent of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has revolutionized lung cancer treatment, necessitating accurate PD-L1 immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment. While standardized for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) histological samples, PD-L1 testing on cytology remains challenging. This review aims to address the complexities of PD-L1 IHC in cytology, focusing on validation guidelines, quality assessment, cyto-histological correlation, and interobserver variability.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This review synthesizes current guidelines and research on PD-L1 IHC in cytology; in particular, recent College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines emphasize the necessity for rigorous validation, particularly for non-formalin-fixed specimens. As far as cyto-histological concordance studies is concerned, the review of 48 original articles reveal significant variability in PD-L1 expression, with concordance rates ranging from 54-100% at the 1% cutoff and 82-100% at the 50% cutoff. Finally, interobserver variability, particularly in the 1-49% PD-L1 expression range, further complicates accurate assessment. The review also discusses the challenges associated with quality assessment in cytology, including the lack of standardized control materials and external quality assessment (EQA) programs specifically tailored for cytological samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PD-L1 testing on cytology presents significant challenges, including validation complexities, quality control limitations, and interobserver variability. Standardized guidelines and rigorous validation are essential to ensure accurate and reliable PD-L1 assessment in cytological specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cytologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The advent of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has revolutionized lung cancer treatment, necessitating accurate PD-L1 immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment. While standardized for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) histological samples, PD-L1 testing on cytology remains challenging. This review aims to address the complexities of PD-L1 IHC in cytology, focusing on validation guidelines, quality assessment, cyto-histological correlation, and interobserver variability.

Summary: This review synthesizes current guidelines and research on PD-L1 IHC in cytology; in particular, recent College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines emphasize the necessity for rigorous validation, particularly for non-formalin-fixed specimens. As far as cyto-histological concordance studies is concerned, the review of 48 original articles reveal significant variability in PD-L1 expression, with concordance rates ranging from 54-100% at the 1% cutoff and 82-100% at the 50% cutoff. Finally, interobserver variability, particularly in the 1-49% PD-L1 expression range, further complicates accurate assessment. The review also discusses the challenges associated with quality assessment in cytology, including the lack of standardized control materials and external quality assessment (EQA) programs specifically tailored for cytological samples.

Conclusion: PD-L1 testing on cytology presents significant challenges, including validation complexities, quality control limitations, and interobserver variability. Standardized guidelines and rigorous validation are essential to ensure accurate and reliable PD-L1 assessment in cytological specimens.

肺细胞学中PD-L1:标准化的途径。
背景:PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂的出现彻底改变了肺癌的治疗,需要准确的PD-L1免疫组织化学(IHC)评估。虽然对福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织学样品进行了标准化,但细胞学上的PD-L1检测仍然具有挑战性。本综述旨在解决PD-L1免疫组化在细胞学上的复杂性,重点关注验证指南、质量评估、细胞-组织学相关性和观察者间变异性。摘要:本文综述了目前细胞学中PD-L1免疫组化的指南和研究;特别是,最近的美国病理学家学院(CAP)指南强调了严格验证的必要性,特别是对于非福尔马林固定标本。就细胞-组织学一致性研究而言,对48篇原始文章的回顾显示,PD-L1表达存在显著差异,一致性率在1%的截止点为54-100%,在50%的截止点为82-100%。最后,观察者之间的差异,特别是在1-49%的PD-L1表达范围内,进一步复杂化了准确的评估。本文还讨论了细胞学质量评估的相关挑战,包括缺乏标准化的控制材料和专门针对细胞学样本的外部质量评估(EQA)程序。结论:细胞学上的PD-L1检测存在重大挑战,包括验证的复杂性、质量控制的局限性和观察者之间的可变性。标准化的指南和严格的验证对于确保细胞学标本中准确可靠的PD-L1评估至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Cytologica
Acta Cytologica 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With articles offering an excellent balance between clinical cytology and cytopathology, ''Acta Cytologica'' fosters the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms behind cytomorphology and thus facilitates the translation of frontline research into clinical practice. As the official journal of the International Academy of Cytology and affiliated to over 50 national cytology societies around the world, ''Acta Cytologica'' evaluates new and existing diagnostic applications of scientific advances as well as their clinical correlations. Original papers, review articles, meta-analyses, novel insights from clinical practice, and letters to the editor cover topics from diagnostic cytopathology, gynecologic and non-gynecologic cytopathology to fine needle aspiration, molecular techniques and their diagnostic applications. As the perfect reference for practical use, ''Acta Cytologica'' addresses a multidisciplinary audience practicing clinical cytopathology, cell biology, oncology, interventional radiology, otorhinolaryngology, gastroenterology, urology, pulmonology and preventive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信