Assessment and cross-validation of calibration transferability between dried blood spot sampling devices for accurate quantification of phosphatidylethanol.

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
J Hose, M Juebner, M Thevis, H Andresen-Streichert
{"title":"Assessment and cross-validation of calibration transferability between dried blood spot sampling devices for accurate quantification of phosphatidylethanol.","authors":"J Hose, M Juebner, M Thevis, H Andresen-Streichert","doi":"10.1007/s00216-025-05897-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a direct alcohol biomarker which is used in a variety of clinical and forensic contexts. Due to its limited stability in whole blood, PEth is routinely analysed using dried blood spots (DBS). There are many different commercially available sampling systems for DBS, but data on their comparability is scarce. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of PEth 16:0/18:1 and PEth 16:0/18:2 for three different DBS sampling systems: Whatman™ filter paper (903 Protein Saver Cards), Mitra<sup>®</sup> and Capitainer<sup>®</sup>B Vanadate. The transferability of calibration curves and their applicability across these devices should be assessed. The results showed that DBS of all devices could be prepared and analysed using the same procedure. Validation was successful for the devices. The accuracy of QCs was best if quantified using the matching DBS sampling device calibration curve (bias < 15 %). Higher, but still acceptable, bias values were observed when using a Whatman™ calibration curve to quantify PEth in DBS of the Capitainer<sup>®</sup>B Vanadate system and vice versa. Mitra<sup>®</sup> QCs should only be quantified using device-specific calibration curves, as in all other cases, accuracy exceeded the limit of 15 %. We recommend analysing samples using device-specific calibrations at all times, as determined PEth concentrations might be crucial for patients and should not be subjected to any avoidable uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":462,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-025-05897-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a direct alcohol biomarker which is used in a variety of clinical and forensic contexts. Due to its limited stability in whole blood, PEth is routinely analysed using dried blood spots (DBS). There are many different commercially available sampling systems for DBS, but data on their comparability is scarce. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of PEth 16:0/18:1 and PEth 16:0/18:2 for three different DBS sampling systems: Whatman™ filter paper (903 Protein Saver Cards), Mitra® and Capitainer®B Vanadate. The transferability of calibration curves and their applicability across these devices should be assessed. The results showed that DBS of all devices could be prepared and analysed using the same procedure. Validation was successful for the devices. The accuracy of QCs was best if quantified using the matching DBS sampling device calibration curve (bias < 15 %). Higher, but still acceptable, bias values were observed when using a Whatman™ calibration curve to quantify PEth in DBS of the Capitainer®B Vanadate system and vice versa. Mitra® QCs should only be quantified using device-specific calibration curves, as in all other cases, accuracy exceeded the limit of 15 %. We recommend analysing samples using device-specific calibrations at all times, as determined PEth concentrations might be crucial for patients and should not be subjected to any avoidable uncertainty.

用于磷脂酰乙醇准确定量的干血点取样装置之间校准可转移性的评估和交叉验证。
磷脂酰乙醇(PEth)是一种直接的酒精生物标志物,用于各种临床和法医环境。由于PEth在全血中的稳定性有限,因此通常使用干血点(DBS)进行分析。有许多不同的商用DBS抽样系统,但关于它们的可比性的数据很少。本研究的目的是开发和验证一种LC-MS/MS方法,用于定量三种不同DBS取样系统(Whatman™滤纸(903 Protein Saver Cards)、Mitra®和Capitainer®B Vanadate)的PEth 16:0/18:1和PEth 16:0/18:2。应评估校准曲线的可转移性及其在这些设备上的适用性。结果表明,所有器件的DBS都可以用相同的方法制备和分析。设备的验证是成功的。采用匹配的DBS取样装置校准曲线(偏差< 15%)进行定量时,质控品的准确度最好。当使用Whatman™校准曲线定量captain®B Vanadate体系DBS中的PEth时,观察到较高但仍可接受的偏差值,反之亦然。Mitra®qc只能使用设备特定的校准曲线进行定量,因为在所有其他情况下,准确度超过15%的限制。我们建议在任何时候都使用特定设备校准分析样品,因为确定的PEth浓度可能对患者至关重要,不应受到任何可避免的不确定性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
638
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry’s mission is the rapid publication of excellent and high-impact research articles on fundamental and applied topics of analytical and bioanalytical measurement science. Its scope is broad, and ranges from novel measurement platforms and their characterization to multidisciplinary approaches that effectively address important scientific problems. The Editors encourage submissions presenting innovative analytical research in concept, instrumentation, methods, and/or applications, including: mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, and electroanalysis; advanced separations; analytical strategies in “-omics” and imaging, bioanalysis, and sampling; miniaturized devices, medical diagnostics, sensors; analytical characterization of nano- and biomaterials; chemometrics and advanced data analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信