Low-osmolar contrast tagging in minimally cathartic CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening: an observational study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Anna Eligulashvili, Zina Ricci, Devaraju Kanmaniraja, David Rezko, Kenny Q Ye, Judy Yee
{"title":"Low-osmolar contrast tagging in minimally cathartic CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening: an observational study.","authors":"Anna Eligulashvili, Zina Ricci, Devaraju Kanmaniraja, David Rezko, Kenny Q Ye, Judy Yee","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04971-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adequate bowel preparation and tagging are critical in optimizing CTC performance. Iohexol has a higher safety profile than other available tagging agents. This study aims to determine if iohexol serves as an adequate fluid and stool tagging agent in conjunction with minimally cathartic bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, 50 participants ingested 50 mL of oral iohexol for tagging and 10 oz magnesium citrate for bowel preparation prior to CTC. Written informed consent was obtained. CTC was performed in all participants in at least two of the standard four positions (supine, prone, right decubitus, and left decubitus). Two board-certified abdominal radiologists independently scored the 6 colonic segments of participants who underwent successful CTC. The amount of residual fluid and solid stool, attenuation of tagged fluid, and efficacy of fluid and stool tagging were recorded in each segment. Statistical analyses were performed with R-4.4.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>47 participants (mean age 66.39 ± 8.65 years; 39 female) underwent successful CTC. Of 1252 total colonic segments, 14.8% had no residual fluid and 59.5% had < 25% residual fluid. 73.6% of segments with residual fluid demonstrated good tagging. The mean fluid tagging efficacy ratio for all segments was 0.737 (95% CI: 0.700-0.775) with mean attenuation of 467 HU. Fluid tagging efficacy decreased from the cecum (0.934) to rectum (0.493). 92.8% of segments had no residual solid stool. Of the 7.2% of segments containing solid stool, 4.7% of segments had submerged stool ≤ 5 mm, 0.8% had 1-3 pieces of retained stool between 6 and 9 mm, and 1.8% had > 3 pieces 6-9 mm or single pieces > 1 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-volume (50 mL) iohexol is an effective fluid and fecal tagging agent for CTC with a minimally cathartic bowel preparation. This provides an easy option to label residual material and cleanse the bowel for patients undergoing CTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04971-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Adequate bowel preparation and tagging are critical in optimizing CTC performance. Iohexol has a higher safety profile than other available tagging agents. This study aims to determine if iohexol serves as an adequate fluid and stool tagging agent in conjunction with minimally cathartic bowel preparation.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, 50 participants ingested 50 mL of oral iohexol for tagging and 10 oz magnesium citrate for bowel preparation prior to CTC. Written informed consent was obtained. CTC was performed in all participants in at least two of the standard four positions (supine, prone, right decubitus, and left decubitus). Two board-certified abdominal radiologists independently scored the 6 colonic segments of participants who underwent successful CTC. The amount of residual fluid and solid stool, attenuation of tagged fluid, and efficacy of fluid and stool tagging were recorded in each segment. Statistical analyses were performed with R-4.4.0.

Results: 47 participants (mean age 66.39 ± 8.65 years; 39 female) underwent successful CTC. Of 1252 total colonic segments, 14.8% had no residual fluid and 59.5% had < 25% residual fluid. 73.6% of segments with residual fluid demonstrated good tagging. The mean fluid tagging efficacy ratio for all segments was 0.737 (95% CI: 0.700-0.775) with mean attenuation of 467 HU. Fluid tagging efficacy decreased from the cecum (0.934) to rectum (0.493). 92.8% of segments had no residual solid stool. Of the 7.2% of segments containing solid stool, 4.7% of segments had submerged stool ≤ 5 mm, 0.8% had 1-3 pieces of retained stool between 6 and 9 mm, and 1.8% had > 3 pieces 6-9 mm or single pieces > 1 cm.

Conclusion: Low-volume (50 mL) iohexol is an effective fluid and fecal tagging agent for CTC with a minimally cathartic bowel preparation. This provides an easy option to label residual material and cleanse the bowel for patients undergoing CTC.

低渗透压造影剂标记在结肠直肠癌筛查中的最低宣泄CT结肠镜检查:一项观察性研究。
目的:充分的肠道准备和标记是优化CTC性能的关键。碘己醇比其他可用的标签剂具有更高的安全性。这项研究的目的是确定碘己醇是否作为一种适当的液体和粪便标记剂,与最低限度的泻肠准备相结合。方法:在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,50名参与者在CTC前口服50毫升碘醇用于标记和10盎司柠檬酸镁用于肠道准备。获得书面知情同意。所有参与者均采用标准四种体位(仰卧位、俯卧位、右卧位和左卧位)中的至少两种进行CTC。两名委员会认证的腹部放射科医生独立地对成功接受CTC的参与者的6个结肠段进行评分。记录每个节段的残余液、固便量、标记液的衰减、液、便标记的效果。采用R-4.4.0进行统计学分析。结果:47例受试者(平均年龄66.39±8.65岁;39名女性)行CTC成功。在1252个结肠节段中,14.8%的结肠节段无残留液体,59.5%的结肠节段有3个6- 9mm或单个bbb1cm的残余液体。结论:小体积(50ml)碘己醇是一种有效的液体和粪便标记剂,用于CTC的最小泻肠准备。这为接受CTC的患者标记残留物质和清洁肠道提供了一个简单的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信