Chloe Tran, Stephanie Pirotta, Haimanot Hailu, Pragya Kandel, Helen Skouteris, Briony Hill
{"title":"Structural weight stigma in healthcare toward preconception, pregnant, and postpartum women: A systematic review.","authors":"Chloe Tran, Stephanie Pirotta, Haimanot Hailu, Pragya Kandel, Helen Skouteris, Briony Hill","doi":"10.1111/obr.13933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Structural weight stigma for reproductive-aged women can limit healthcare access and increase physical and mental health concerns, with adverse intergenerational outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence of structural weight stigma in healthcare and determine how that impacts the care for women across the preconception, pregnant, and postpartum periods.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The concepts of stigma, weight, healthcare, and women of reproductive age were combined and searched in five databases (Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL) and 12 gray literature sources. Inclusion criteria consisted of any peer-reviewed study or government policy that described a structural element within healthcare (e.g., guidelines, funding, insurance, equipment, physical environment) relevant to women of reproductive age (18-50 years) between 2001 and 2023. A narrative synthesis using a convergent approach was employed to analyze results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 studies were included in this review; 24 qualitative, 21 quantitative, 10 policies, 3 dissertations, and one mixed-method study. Structural weight stigma in healthcare presented across: 1) institutional policies that are weight-centric and often placed women in larger bodies on \"high-risk\" pathways; 2) the lack of government funding and insurance coverage for weight-related services; 3) uncertainty amongst healthcare professions regarding their roles and responsibilities, 4) stigmatizing physical environments; and 5) lack of appropriately sized equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Structural weight stigma impacting preconception, pregnant and postpartum women living in larger bodies was highly prevalent. Reducing structural weight stigma is important to improve healthcare access and improve the quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13933"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13933","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Structural weight stigma for reproductive-aged women can limit healthcare access and increase physical and mental health concerns, with adverse intergenerational outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence of structural weight stigma in healthcare and determine how that impacts the care for women across the preconception, pregnant, and postpartum periods.
Methodology: The concepts of stigma, weight, healthcare, and women of reproductive age were combined and searched in five databases (Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL) and 12 gray literature sources. Inclusion criteria consisted of any peer-reviewed study or government policy that described a structural element within healthcare (e.g., guidelines, funding, insurance, equipment, physical environment) relevant to women of reproductive age (18-50 years) between 2001 and 2023. A narrative synthesis using a convergent approach was employed to analyze results.
Results: A total of 70 studies were included in this review; 24 qualitative, 21 quantitative, 10 policies, 3 dissertations, and one mixed-method study. Structural weight stigma in healthcare presented across: 1) institutional policies that are weight-centric and often placed women in larger bodies on "high-risk" pathways; 2) the lack of government funding and insurance coverage for weight-related services; 3) uncertainty amongst healthcare professions regarding their roles and responsibilities, 4) stigmatizing physical environments; and 5) lack of appropriately sized equipment.
Conclusions: Structural weight stigma impacting preconception, pregnant and postpartum women living in larger bodies was highly prevalent. Reducing structural weight stigma is important to improve healthcare access and improve the quality of care.
导读:育龄妇女的结构性体重耻辱感会限制获得医疗保健的机会,增加身心健康问题,并带来不良的代际结果。本系统综述的目的是综合医疗保健中结构性体重耻辱感的证据,并确定其如何影响孕前、怀孕和产后妇女的护理。方法:结合病耻感、体重、医疗保健和育龄妇女的概念,检索5个数据库(Ovid Medline、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Scopus、CINAHL)和12个灰色文献来源。纳入标准包括描述2001年至2023年期间与育龄妇女(18-50岁)相关的医疗保健结构要素(如指南、资金、保险、设备、物理环境)的任何同行评议研究或政府政策。采用收敛方法的叙事综合来分析结果。结果:本综述共纳入70项研究;定性研究24项,定量研究21项,政策研究10项,论文3篇,混合方法研究1篇。医疗保健中的结构性体重耻辱感表现为:1)以体重为中心的体制政策,往往将女性置于“高风险”路径上;2)与体重有关的服务缺乏政府资助和保险覆盖;3)医疗保健专业人员对其角色和责任的不确定性;4)对物理环境的污名化;5)缺乏适当尺寸的设备。结论:结构性体重耻辱感影响着孕前、孕期和产后体重较大的妇女。减少结构性体重耻辱感对于改善医疗保健可及性和提高护理质量非常重要。
期刊介绍:
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities.
Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field.
The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.