Microbial Distortion? Impacts of Delayed Preservation on Microbiome Diversity and Composition in a Marine Invertebrate

IF 3.9 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Brenna Hutchings, Susanna López-Legentil, Lauren Stefaniak, Marie Nydam, Patrick M. Erwin
{"title":"Microbial Distortion? Impacts of Delayed Preservation on Microbiome Diversity and Composition in a Marine Invertebrate","authors":"Brenna Hutchings,&nbsp;Susanna López-Legentil,&nbsp;Lauren Stefaniak,&nbsp;Marie Nydam,&nbsp;Patrick M. Erwin","doi":"10.1002/mbo3.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field collections of marine invertebrates are often accompanied by delays in preservation, which may impact microbiome composition. Here, we tested the effects of delayed preservation and relaxation methods on microbiome diversity and composition in the colonial ascidian <i>Trididemnum solidum</i> using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Replicate samples collected from Belizean reefs were either (1) immediately preserved in ethanol (“control”), (2) held in ambient seawater for 3 h before preservation (“SW”), or (3) held in ambient seawater with menthol (a common pre-preservation relaxation technique for ascidian identification) for 3 h before preservation (“SW + M”). All <i>T. solidum</i> microbiomes were different from ambient seawater bacterioplankton and dominated by the same microbial taxa, including the genera <i>Thalassobaculum</i>, <i>Tistrella</i>, and <i>Synechocystis</i>. However, the 3-h delay in sample preservation (SW) significantly reduced microbiome richness compared to controls (<i>p</i> = 0.028), while menthol treatment (SW + M) mitigated this diversity loss (<i>p</i> = 0.208). Microbial composition at the community level did not differ significantly for either delayed preservation method compared to controls (SW <i>p</i> = 0.054, SW + M <i>p</i> = 0.052). Taxon-level shifts were rare but did occur, most notably a bloom of the facultatively anaerobic gammaproteobacterium <i>Catenococcus</i> that was 37x (SW) and 197x (SW + M) more abundant in delayed preservations. After a 3-h preservation delay (SW), only 122 microbial taxa (1.85% of total) exhibited significantly differential abundances with controls, with menthol treatment (SW + M) reducing taxon-level shifts to 65 taxa (0.98%). Our results showed that brief delays in preservation did not significantly alter community-level microbiome composition and dominant taxa, with menthol exposure counteracting minor microbiome shifts associated with preservation delays.</p>","PeriodicalId":18573,"journal":{"name":"MicrobiologyOpen","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mbo3.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MicrobiologyOpen","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mbo3.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Field collections of marine invertebrates are often accompanied by delays in preservation, which may impact microbiome composition. Here, we tested the effects of delayed preservation and relaxation methods on microbiome diversity and composition in the colonial ascidian Trididemnum solidum using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Replicate samples collected from Belizean reefs were either (1) immediately preserved in ethanol (“control”), (2) held in ambient seawater for 3 h before preservation (“SW”), or (3) held in ambient seawater with menthol (a common pre-preservation relaxation technique for ascidian identification) for 3 h before preservation (“SW + M”). All T. solidum microbiomes were different from ambient seawater bacterioplankton and dominated by the same microbial taxa, including the genera Thalassobaculum, Tistrella, and Synechocystis. However, the 3-h delay in sample preservation (SW) significantly reduced microbiome richness compared to controls (p = 0.028), while menthol treatment (SW + M) mitigated this diversity loss (p = 0.208). Microbial composition at the community level did not differ significantly for either delayed preservation method compared to controls (SW p = 0.054, SW + M p = 0.052). Taxon-level shifts were rare but did occur, most notably a bloom of the facultatively anaerobic gammaproteobacterium Catenococcus that was 37x (SW) and 197x (SW + M) more abundant in delayed preservations. After a 3-h preservation delay (SW), only 122 microbial taxa (1.85% of total) exhibited significantly differential abundances with controls, with menthol treatment (SW + M) reducing taxon-level shifts to 65 taxa (0.98%). Our results showed that brief delays in preservation did not significantly alter community-level microbiome composition and dominant taxa, with menthol exposure counteracting minor microbiome shifts associated with preservation delays.

Abstract Image

微生物失真?延迟保存对海洋无脊椎动物微生物群多样性和组成的影响
海洋无脊椎动物的野外采集往往伴随着保存的延迟,这可能会影响微生物组的组成。在这里,我们使用16S rRNA扩增子测序测试了延迟保存和松弛方法对海鞘群落微生物组多样性和组成的影响。从伯利兹珊瑚礁收集的重复样本要么(1)立即在乙醇中保存(“对照”),(2)在保存前在环境海水中保存3小时(“SW”),或者(3)在保存前用薄荷醇(一种常见的用于海鞘鉴定的保存前放松技术)在环境海水中保存3小时(“SW + M”)。所有的固体T.菌群都不同于周围的海水浮游细菌,并以相同的微生物类群为主,包括海索菌属、Tistrella属和Synechocystis属。然而,与对照组相比,样品保存延迟3小时(SW)显著降低了微生物组丰富度(p = 0.028),而薄荷醇处理(SW + M)减轻了这种多样性损失(p = 0.208)。两种延迟保存方法在群落水平上的微生物组成与对照组相比没有显著差异(SW p = 0.054, SW + M p = 0.052)。分类群水平的变化很少,但确实发生过,最明显的是兼性厌氧γ -变形杆菌Catenococcus的华度在延迟保存中增加了37x (SW)和197x (SW + M)。保存3 h后,只有122个微生物类群(1.85%)的丰度与对照组有显著差异,而薄荷醇处理(SW + M)使65个类群(0.98%)的丰度发生显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,短暂的保存延迟并没有显著改变群落水平的微生物组组成和优势分类群,薄荷醇暴露抵消了与保存延迟相关的微小微生物组变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MicrobiologyOpen
MicrobiologyOpen MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: MicrobiologyOpen is a peer reviewed, fully open access, broad-scope, and interdisciplinary journal delivering rapid decisions and fast publication of microbial science, a field which is undergoing a profound and exciting evolution in this post-genomic era. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish quality research in both fundamental and applied microbiology. Our goal is to publish articles that stimulate discussion and debate, as well as add to our knowledge base and further the understanding of microbial interactions and microbial processes. MicrobiologyOpen gives prompt and equal consideration to articles reporting theoretical, experimental, applied, and descriptive work in all aspects of bacteriology, virology, mycology and protistology, including, but not limited to: - agriculture - antimicrobial resistance - astrobiology - biochemistry - biotechnology - cell and molecular biology - clinical microbiology - computational, systems, and synthetic microbiology - environmental science - evolutionary biology, ecology, and systematics - food science and technology - genetics and genomics - geobiology and earth science - host-microbe interactions - infectious diseases - natural products discovery - pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry - physiology - plant pathology - veterinary microbiology We will consider submissions across unicellular and cell-cluster organisms: prokaryotes (bacteria, archaea) and eukaryotes (fungi, protists, microalgae, lichens), as well as viruses and prions infecting or interacting with microorganisms, plants and animals, including genetic, biochemical, biophysical, bioinformatic and structural analyses. The journal features Original Articles (including full Research articles, Method articles, and Short Communications), Commentaries, Reviews, and Editorials. Original papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the article. We also support confirmatory research and aim to work with authors to meet reviewer expectations. MicrobiologyOpen publishes articles submitted directly to the journal and those referred from other Wiley journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信