Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Using the Hinotori Surgical Robot System: A Single Surgeon's Initial Experience of 20 Cases
{"title":"Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Using the Hinotori Surgical Robot System: A Single Surgeon's Initial Experience of 20 Cases","authors":"Hiromitsu Watanabe, Yuto Matsushita, Keita Tamura, Daisuke Motoyama, Atsushi Otsuka, Hideaki Miyake","doi":"10.1002/rcs.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to assess the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal ileal conduit (ICIC) using the hinotori surgical robot system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included 20 consecutive patients with bladder cancer who underwent RARC with ICIC using hinotori from October 2023 to July 2024. Major perioperative outcomes were comprehensively analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median operative time, time using the robotic system, bowel reconstruction and urinary diversion time, and estimated blood loss were 435.0, 330.0, 122.5 min, and 175.0 mL, respectively. No marked intraoperative complications were observed. Perioperative, 30-day, and 90-day complications occurred at rates of 25%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. The learning curve tended to decrease in a case volume-dependent manner.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>RARC using hinotori was successfully completed, and favourable perioperative outcomes were achieved without severe complications. This suggests that RARC using hinotori provides a potentially comparable alternative to conventional surgical systems.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcs.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The objective of this study was to assess the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal ileal conduit (ICIC) using the hinotori surgical robot system.
Methods
This retrospective study included 20 consecutive patients with bladder cancer who underwent RARC with ICIC using hinotori from October 2023 to July 2024. Major perioperative outcomes were comprehensively analysed.
Results
The median operative time, time using the robotic system, bowel reconstruction and urinary diversion time, and estimated blood loss were 435.0, 330.0, 122.5 min, and 175.0 mL, respectively. No marked intraoperative complications were observed. Perioperative, 30-day, and 90-day complications occurred at rates of 25%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. The learning curve tended to decrease in a case volume-dependent manner.
Conclusions
RARC using hinotori was successfully completed, and favourable perioperative outcomes were achieved without severe complications. This suggests that RARC using hinotori provides a potentially comparable alternative to conventional surgical systems.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery provides a cross-disciplinary platform for presenting the latest developments in robotics and computer assisted technologies for medical applications. The journal publishes cutting-edge papers and expert reviews, complemented by commentaries, correspondence and conference highlights that stimulate discussion and exchange of ideas. Areas of interest include robotic surgery aids and systems, operative planning tools, medical imaging and visualisation, simulation and navigation, virtual reality, intuitive command and control systems, haptics and sensor technologies. In addition to research and surgical planning studies, the journal welcomes papers detailing clinical trials and applications of computer-assisted workflows and robotic systems in neurosurgery, urology, paediatric, orthopaedic, craniofacial, cardiovascular, thoraco-abdominal, musculoskeletal and visceral surgery. Articles providing critical analysis of clinical trials, assessment of the benefits and risks of the application of these technologies, commenting on ease of use, or addressing surgical education and training issues are also encouraged. The journal aims to foster a community that encompasses medical practitioners, researchers, and engineers and computer scientists developing robotic systems and computational tools in academic and commercial environments, with the intention of promoting and developing these exciting areas of medical technology.