Kirsten Franzen, Alice Favero, Caleb Milliken, Chris Wade
{"title":"Assessing GHG Emissions Implications of Forest Residue Use for Energy Production","authors":"Kirsten Franzen, Alice Favero, Caleb Milliken, Chris Wade","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As global interest in enhancing energy security, reducing energy costs, and promoting rural economic development grows, the use of forest residues for bioenergy has gained attention. While bioenergy derived from forest residues can help meet power needs and support policy goals, significant uncertainty remains regarding the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with their production and use. This study aims to explore the key drivers of these uncertainties by reviewing estimates of GHG emissions from forest residue use for energy, as presented in peer-reviewed journals, reports, and gray literature. The findings reveal a wide range of GHG emission outcomes, with some studies suggesting net emissions and others indicating net removals. This uncertainty stems from the complexity of time scales, variety of forest management approaches and feedstock quality, assumptions about alternative scenarios, and varying approaches to emissions accounting. Recognizing that each method has its unique attributes, we propose an ideal framework that integrates multiple approaches to provide a more comprehensive assessment of the potential net GHG outcomes of using forest residues for energy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As global interest in enhancing energy security, reducing energy costs, and promoting rural economic development grows, the use of forest residues for bioenergy has gained attention. While bioenergy derived from forest residues can help meet power needs and support policy goals, significant uncertainty remains regarding the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with their production and use. This study aims to explore the key drivers of these uncertainties by reviewing estimates of GHG emissions from forest residue use for energy, as presented in peer-reviewed journals, reports, and gray literature. The findings reveal a wide range of GHG emission outcomes, with some studies suggesting net emissions and others indicating net removals. This uncertainty stems from the complexity of time scales, variety of forest management approaches and feedstock quality, assumptions about alternative scenarios, and varying approaches to emissions accounting. Recognizing that each method has its unique attributes, we propose an ideal framework that integrates multiple approaches to provide a more comprehensive assessment of the potential net GHG outcomes of using forest residues for energy.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.