Postdisaster Reconstruction After the 2021 Floods From the Neighborhood Perspective

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Marisa Fuchs
{"title":"Postdisaster Reconstruction After the 2021 Floods From the Neighborhood Perspective","authors":"Marisa Fuchs","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The floods in Western Europe in July 2021 demonstrated the diverse ways and varying paces at which neighborhoods recover from disasters. Based on two exemplary neighborhoods affected by the floods in the city of Hagen, Germany, this study examines the reconstruction process, highlighting the influence of social vulnerabilities and community resilience on private reconstruction processes. Despite differing contexts, both case studies demonstrated a significant reliance on external support during reconstruction. Individual needs varied based on social vulnerabilities within and between population groups, primarily manifesting as challenges in information dissemination and access to support services like funding and expertise. The findings reveal differences in the ability and capacity of neighborhoods to collectively address these vulnerabilities. While small neighborhood networks effectively facilitated information sharing in both cases, one case study relied more heavily on external assistance from nonprofit organizations for larger and longer-term community-driven initiatives. The study underscores the need for improvements in postdisaster reconstruction governance. Public authorities predominantly view neighborhoods as recipients rather than partners in the reconstruction process, without adequately addressing their social vulnerabilities within their governance approaches. Supporting local social infrastructures is crucial, as they connect formal reconstruction with the neighborhood, aiding resource access and resilience building.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The floods in Western Europe in July 2021 demonstrated the diverse ways and varying paces at which neighborhoods recover from disasters. Based on two exemplary neighborhoods affected by the floods in the city of Hagen, Germany, this study examines the reconstruction process, highlighting the influence of social vulnerabilities and community resilience on private reconstruction processes. Despite differing contexts, both case studies demonstrated a significant reliance on external support during reconstruction. Individual needs varied based on social vulnerabilities within and between population groups, primarily manifesting as challenges in information dissemination and access to support services like funding and expertise. The findings reveal differences in the ability and capacity of neighborhoods to collectively address these vulnerabilities. While small neighborhood networks effectively facilitated information sharing in both cases, one case study relied more heavily on external assistance from nonprofit organizations for larger and longer-term community-driven initiatives. The study underscores the need for improvements in postdisaster reconstruction governance. Public authorities predominantly view neighborhoods as recipients rather than partners in the reconstruction process, without adequately addressing their social vulnerabilities within their governance approaches. Supporting local social infrastructures is crucial, as they connect formal reconstruction with the neighborhood, aiding resource access and resilience building.

从邻里视角看2021年洪水后的灾后重建
2021年7月西欧的洪水展示了社区从灾难中恢复的多种方式和不同的速度。本研究以德国哈根市两个受洪水影响的模范社区为基础,考察了重建过程,强调了社会脆弱性和社区复原力对私人重建过程的影响。尽管背景不同,但这两个案例研究都表明重建过程中严重依赖外部支持。个人需求因人口群体内部和群体之间的社会脆弱性而异,主要表现为信息传播和获得资金和专门知识等支助服务方面的挑战。调查结果揭示了社区共同解决这些脆弱性的能力和能力的差异。虽然在这两种情况下,小型社区网络有效地促进了信息共享,但有一个案例研究更多地依赖于非营利组织的外部援助,以开展更大规模、更长期的社区驱动计划。这项研究强调了改善灾后重建治理的必要性。公共当局主要将社区视为重建过程中的接受者,而不是合作伙伴,没有在其治理方法中充分解决社区的社会脆弱性。支持当地社会基础设施至关重要,因为它们将正式重建与社区联系起来,有助于获取资源和增强复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信