Prediction of Network Public Opinion Evolution Trends in Emergent Hot Events

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Xinyan Zhang, Jing Fang
{"title":"Prediction of Network Public Opinion Evolution Trends in Emergent Hot Events","authors":"Xinyan Zhang,&nbsp;Jing Fang","doi":"10.1002/cpe.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In recent years, there has been a notable increase in food safety incidents, which has raised considerable public concern. Optimizing food safety supervision and enhancing public trust have become urgent issues to be addressed. This study specifically examines the “tanker mixed with edible oil” incident and employs a variety of methodologies, including text analysis and time series modeling, to conduct a comprehensive analysis of public sentiment, The findings provide a scientific foundation for enhancing regulatory oversight. Relevant data were gathered via Python, public opinion trends were forecast via the ARIMA time series model, and an in-depth analysis of the thematic characteristics associated with each phase of public opinion development was conducted by integrating LDA topic modeling techniques. Meanwhile, this study employs social network analysis to construct an interactive network among users and identify key nodes and pathways involved in the dissemination of public opinion. Through simulation analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) The “tanker mixed with cooking oil” incident exhibited a pronounced trend of negative sentiment that intensified over time. (2) The thematic analysis reveals public concern regarding disarray in food transportation and insufficient regulatory oversight, highlighting a shift in the public's focus. (3) Social network analysis emphasizes the crucial roles played by official media and individual key opinion leaders (KOLs) in shaping public opinion, illustrating how these entities influence the direction of public sentiment through their interactive relationships. Through the empirical analysis of the “tanker mixed with edible oil” incident, this paper verifies the effectiveness of the adopted method, providing an important reference for the risk prevention and control of food safety public opinion and policy-making.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55214,"journal":{"name":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","volume":"37 12-14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.70125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a notable increase in food safety incidents, which has raised considerable public concern. Optimizing food safety supervision and enhancing public trust have become urgent issues to be addressed. This study specifically examines the “tanker mixed with edible oil” incident and employs a variety of methodologies, including text analysis and time series modeling, to conduct a comprehensive analysis of public sentiment, The findings provide a scientific foundation for enhancing regulatory oversight. Relevant data were gathered via Python, public opinion trends were forecast via the ARIMA time series model, and an in-depth analysis of the thematic characteristics associated with each phase of public opinion development was conducted by integrating LDA topic modeling techniques. Meanwhile, this study employs social network analysis to construct an interactive network among users and identify key nodes and pathways involved in the dissemination of public opinion. Through simulation analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) The “tanker mixed with cooking oil” incident exhibited a pronounced trend of negative sentiment that intensified over time. (2) The thematic analysis reveals public concern regarding disarray in food transportation and insufficient regulatory oversight, highlighting a shift in the public's focus. (3) Social network analysis emphasizes the crucial roles played by official media and individual key opinion leaders (KOLs) in shaping public opinion, illustrating how these entities influence the direction of public sentiment through their interactive relationships. Through the empirical analysis of the “tanker mixed with edible oil” incident, this paper verifies the effectiveness of the adopted method, providing an important reference for the risk prevention and control of food safety public opinion and policy-making.

突发热点事件中网络舆情演变趋势预测
近年来,食品安全事件显著增加,引起了公众的广泛关注。优化食品安全监管,增强公众信任,成为亟待解决的问题。本研究以“油船混入食用油”事件为具体案例,运用文本分析、时间序列建模等多种方法,对舆情进行综合分析,为加强监管提供科学依据。通过Python收集相关数据,通过ARIMA时间序列模型预测舆情趋势,并结合LDA主题建模技术深入分析舆情发展各阶段相关的主题特征。同时,本研究运用社会网络分析构建了用户之间的互动网络,识别了舆情传播的关键节点和路径。通过模拟分析,得出以下结论:(1)“油轮混油”事件表现出明显的负面情绪趋势,且随着时间的推移,负面情绪愈演愈烈。(2)主题分析揭示了公众对食品运输混乱和监管不足的担忧,凸显了公众关注焦点的转变。(3)社会网络分析强调官方媒体和个人关键意见领袖(kol)在舆论塑造中的关键作用,说明这些实体如何通过互动关系影响公众情绪的走向。通过对“油罐车混入食用油”事件的实证分析,验证了所采用方法的有效性,为食品安全舆论和政策制定的风险防控提供了重要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
664
审稿时长
9.6 months
期刊介绍: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) publishes high-quality, original research papers, and authoritative research review papers, in the overlapping fields of: Parallel and distributed computing; High-performance computing; Computational and data science; Artificial intelligence and machine learning; Big data applications, algorithms, and systems; Network science; Ontologies and semantics; Security and privacy; Cloud/edge/fog computing; Green computing; and Quantum computing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信