Expanding Horizons: Single-Center Insights on Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) in Non-Lung Solid Organ Transplantation

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
V. Rakesh Sethapati, Naureen Narula, Muharrem Yunce
{"title":"Expanding Horizons: Single-Center Insights on Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) in Non-Lung Solid Organ Transplantation","authors":"V. Rakesh Sethapati,&nbsp;Naureen Narula,&nbsp;Muharrem Yunce","doi":"10.1002/jca.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Transplantation remains the best option for patients with advanced-stage organ failure. In some patients, despite aggressive medical management with immunosuppressants, refractory/recurrent rejection occurs. This single-center retrospective study aims to analyze the role of ECP as an add-on therapy to treat acute cellular rejection (ACR) and/or antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in non-lung organ transplantation. We identified five non-lung solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients refractory to standard anti-rejection interventions that received ECP therapy in the last 5 years: one liver transplant, two heart transplants, and two small bowel transplants. Baseline demographics, time to ECP initiation, clinical assessment, and biopsy results were analyzed. They received at least 6 months of ECP for biopsy-proven ACR and/or AMR. Graft function was assessed clinically after 6 months by biopsy and/or clinical functional assessment. Graft function improved in all five patients after 6 months of ECP therapy based on clinical functional evaluation and by biopsy in some patients. No complications or adverse events were reported. This study supports the potential for ECP as an adjunctive therapy in non-lung organ transplant recipients who are refractory to standard therapies and present with ACR and/or AMR. ECP has immunomodulating effect with minimal procedural risk. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm the beneficial effects of ECP in the setting of ACR and AMR post organ transplantation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transplantation remains the best option for patients with advanced-stage organ failure. In some patients, despite aggressive medical management with immunosuppressants, refractory/recurrent rejection occurs. This single-center retrospective study aims to analyze the role of ECP as an add-on therapy to treat acute cellular rejection (ACR) and/or antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in non-lung organ transplantation. We identified five non-lung solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients refractory to standard anti-rejection interventions that received ECP therapy in the last 5 years: one liver transplant, two heart transplants, and two small bowel transplants. Baseline demographics, time to ECP initiation, clinical assessment, and biopsy results were analyzed. They received at least 6 months of ECP for biopsy-proven ACR and/or AMR. Graft function was assessed clinically after 6 months by biopsy and/or clinical functional assessment. Graft function improved in all five patients after 6 months of ECP therapy based on clinical functional evaluation and by biopsy in some patients. No complications or adverse events were reported. This study supports the potential for ECP as an adjunctive therapy in non-lung organ transplant recipients who are refractory to standard therapies and present with ACR and/or AMR. ECP has immunomodulating effect with minimal procedural risk. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm the beneficial effects of ECP in the setting of ACR and AMR post organ transplantation.

拓展视野:非肺实体器官移植中体外光发生(ECP)的单中心见解
移植仍然是晚期器官衰竭患者的最佳选择。在一些患者中,尽管使用免疫抑制剂进行积极的医疗管理,仍会发生难治性/复发性排斥反应。本单中心回顾性研究旨在分析ECP作为非肺器官移植急性细胞排斥反应(ACR)和/或抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)的附加治疗的作用。我们确定了在过去5年中接受ECP治疗的5例非肺实体器官移植(SOT)受者:1例肝移植,2例心脏移植和2例小肠移植。分析了基线人口统计学、ECP启动时间、临床评估和活检结果。他们因活检证实的ACR和/或AMR接受了至少6个月的ECP治疗。6个月后通过活检和/或临床功能评估临床评估移植物功能。经ECP治疗6个月后,基于临床功能评估和部分患者活检,5例患者移植物功能均有改善。无并发症或不良事件报道。本研究支持ECP作为标准治疗难治性、出现ACR和/或AMR的非肺器官移植受者的辅助治疗的潜力。ECP具有免疫调节作用,手术风险小。有必要进行前瞻性研究,以证实ECP在器官移植后ACR和AMR的有益作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信