The importance of the subindices on quantitative assessment of geodiversity: a methodological discussion and application to the Geopark Costões e Lagunas, SE Brazil
Daniel Souza dos Santos, Kátia Leite Mansur, Jhone Caetano de Araújo, Elisa Elena de Souza Santos, Neila Nunes Ferreira
{"title":"The importance of the subindices on quantitative assessment of geodiversity: a methodological discussion and application to the Geopark Costões e Lagunas, SE Brazil","authors":"Daniel Souza dos Santos, Kátia Leite Mansur, Jhone Caetano de Araújo, Elisa Elena de Souza Santos, Neila Nunes Ferreira","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12291-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The last decades witnessed methodological advances concerning the creation of quantitative geodiversity maps, which represent the quantity and spatial distribution of abiotic elements. However, there are still issues regarding the creation of these maps. This work presents the geodiversity index map of the Geopark <i>Costões e Lagunas</i>, located in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. The map was generated through four subindices: lithological, geomorphological, pedological, and hydrological. The quantification method involved overlaying a regular grid (2,5 × 2,5 km grid cells) onto thematic maps representing the subindices, which is the most common method to generate geodiversity index maps. This resulted in five maps: geodiversity index, and the four subindex maps. We argue that the subindices should not be simply used as steps to achieve the final product, since they are relevant on their own. Therefore, attention should be given both to the methodological procedures for their creation and to the generated results. The manuscript discusses the selection of subindices; potential errors for counting a single element more than once; the notion that a geodiversity index map may hide areas that are important due to specific components; and the importance of using subindex maps as relevant results and not only as secondary products. These discussions are intended to contribute to the methodological consolidation concerning the creation of geodiversity index maps, which are acknowledged as important environmental management tools for displaying the richness and spatial distribution of the abiotic environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12291-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The last decades witnessed methodological advances concerning the creation of quantitative geodiversity maps, which represent the quantity and spatial distribution of abiotic elements. However, there are still issues regarding the creation of these maps. This work presents the geodiversity index map of the Geopark Costões e Lagunas, located in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. The map was generated through four subindices: lithological, geomorphological, pedological, and hydrological. The quantification method involved overlaying a regular grid (2,5 × 2,5 km grid cells) onto thematic maps representing the subindices, which is the most common method to generate geodiversity index maps. This resulted in five maps: geodiversity index, and the four subindex maps. We argue that the subindices should not be simply used as steps to achieve the final product, since they are relevant on their own. Therefore, attention should be given both to the methodological procedures for their creation and to the generated results. The manuscript discusses the selection of subindices; potential errors for counting a single element more than once; the notion that a geodiversity index map may hide areas that are important due to specific components; and the importance of using subindex maps as relevant results and not only as secondary products. These discussions are intended to contribute to the methodological consolidation concerning the creation of geodiversity index maps, which are acknowledged as important environmental management tools for displaying the richness and spatial distribution of the abiotic environment.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.