{"title":"Postprocessing Compensation for Rotating Accelerometer Gravity Gradiometer Using Linear Motion Error Model Coefficient Calibration Method","authors":"Bohai Ke;Mingbiao Yu;Yu Liang;Xukai Guo;Xiaobing Yu;Tao Jiang;Li Yu;Chenyuan Hu;Huafeng Liu;Ji Fan;Zebing Zhou","doi":"10.1109/TIM.2025.3565784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motion errors pose a significant challenge to moving-base gravity gradient measurement applications. To eliminate those errors, model-based compensation methods are commonly employed. However, those compensation results are strongly influenced by the motion error model correctness. This article proposes a postprocessing compensation method, which can solve that problem, for the rotating accelerometer gravity gradiometer (RAGG). Two experiments are carefully designed to validate the different components of the linear motion error model. Using a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) platform, sinusoidal excitations are employed for motion error coefficients calibration. The experimental results show that the R-squared value of the fitting (<inline-formula> <tex-math>${R} ^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) exceeded 0.995, confirming the accuracy of the RAGG linear motion error coefficients calibration. Additionally, using the calibrated motion error coefficients, an aircraft motion excitation is also applied on the RAGG for postprocessing compensation. The compensated outputs indicate that the motion errors can be reduced from the micro-g (<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>g) level to the order of nano-g (ng). The power spectral density (PSD) of the results after compensation show an excellent accordance with those of the RAGG self-noise in static measurement. These results provide a guidance for noise reduction and motion error compensation in RAGG systems.","PeriodicalId":13341,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement","volume":"74 ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10981539/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Motion errors pose a significant challenge to moving-base gravity gradient measurement applications. To eliminate those errors, model-based compensation methods are commonly employed. However, those compensation results are strongly influenced by the motion error model correctness. This article proposes a postprocessing compensation method, which can solve that problem, for the rotating accelerometer gravity gradiometer (RAGG). Two experiments are carefully designed to validate the different components of the linear motion error model. Using a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) platform, sinusoidal excitations are employed for motion error coefficients calibration. The experimental results show that the R-squared value of the fitting (${R} ^{2}$ ) exceeded 0.995, confirming the accuracy of the RAGG linear motion error coefficients calibration. Additionally, using the calibrated motion error coefficients, an aircraft motion excitation is also applied on the RAGG for postprocessing compensation. The compensated outputs indicate that the motion errors can be reduced from the micro-g ($\mu $ g) level to the order of nano-g (ng). The power spectral density (PSD) of the results after compensation show an excellent accordance with those of the RAGG self-noise in static measurement. These results provide a guidance for noise reduction and motion error compensation in RAGG systems.
期刊介绍:
Papers are sought that address innovative solutions to the development and use of electrical and electronic instruments and equipment to measure, monitor and/or record physical phenomena for the purpose of advancing measurement science, methods, functionality and applications. The scope of these papers may encompass: (1) theory, methodology, and practice of measurement; (2) design, development and evaluation of instrumentation and measurement systems and components used in generating, acquiring, conditioning and processing signals; (3) analysis, representation, display, and preservation of the information obtained from a set of measurements; and (4) scientific and technical support to establishment and maintenance of technical standards in the field of Instrumentation and Measurement.