Foreign Venture Capital as Channels of Cross-Border Knowledge Flows: Empirical Evidence From U.S. Critical Industries

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Roberto S. Santos;Yi Yang
{"title":"Foreign Venture Capital as Channels of Cross-Border Knowledge Flows: Empirical Evidence From U.S. Critical Industries","authors":"Roberto S. Santos;Yi Yang","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3565475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cross-border knowledge flows may adversely affect nations’ competitive advantage and national security. This presents a dilemma not only for policymakers, but also for managers of high-tech startups looking to raise capital from foreign investors. Applying an organizational ecology lens, we empirically examine whether foreign venture capital (VC) investments in a technologically advanced host country represent a channel through which knowledge may flow back to their home country. We create a unique dataset of 1148 country-year observations of foreign VC investments made in 27 industries deemed to be “critical infrastructure” by the U.S. government. We find evidence that increased foreign VC investment is associated with an inverse U-shaped relationship with knowledge flows. This relationship is moderated by institutional and macroeconomic conditions such as the home country's intellectual property rights regime and the technology gap between the home and host countries. As an important resource for financing the development of advanced technologies, our results suggest that managers should carefully weigh the benefits of accepting foreign VC capital with the potential for cross-border knowledge flows.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"1799-1812"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10980201/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cross-border knowledge flows may adversely affect nations’ competitive advantage and national security. This presents a dilemma not only for policymakers, but also for managers of high-tech startups looking to raise capital from foreign investors. Applying an organizational ecology lens, we empirically examine whether foreign venture capital (VC) investments in a technologically advanced host country represent a channel through which knowledge may flow back to their home country. We create a unique dataset of 1148 country-year observations of foreign VC investments made in 27 industries deemed to be “critical infrastructure” by the U.S. government. We find evidence that increased foreign VC investment is associated with an inverse U-shaped relationship with knowledge flows. This relationship is moderated by institutional and macroeconomic conditions such as the home country's intellectual property rights regime and the technology gap between the home and host countries. As an important resource for financing the development of advanced technologies, our results suggest that managers should carefully weigh the benefits of accepting foreign VC capital with the potential for cross-border knowledge flows.
外国风险投资作为跨境知识流动的渠道:来自美国关键行业的经验证据
跨境知识流动可能对国家的竞争优势和国家安全产生不利影响。这不仅给政策制定者带来了困境,也给那些希望从外国投资者那里筹集资金的高科技初创企业的管理者带来了困境。运用组织生态学的视角,我们实证地考察了外国风险资本(VC)在技术先进的东道国的投资是否代表了知识可能回流到其母国的渠道。我们创建了一个独特的数据集,其中包含1148个国家/地区对27个被美国政府视为“关键基础设施”的行业的外国风险投资的年度观察。我们发现证据表明,外国风险投资的增加与知识流动呈反u型关系。这种关系受到体制和宏观经济条件的制约,例如母国的知识产权制度和母国与东道国之间的技术差距。作为资助先进技术发展的重要资源,我们的研究结果表明,管理者应该仔细权衡接受外国风险资本与跨境知识流动的潜在利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信